World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
9450
World Ranking
6389
National Ranking
3465

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
9649
World Ranking
6383
National Ranking
2778

Aaron R. Seitz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron R. Seitz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 255 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Aaron R. Seitz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron R. Seitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Aaron R. Seitz is affiliated with the University of California, Riverside in the United States. Their research activity is predominantly situated within the field of Neuroscience, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Speech and Hearing, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Sensory Systems.

The scientist's recent research outputs include studies published between 2020 and 2022, addressing various aspects of auditory assessment, working memory training, and neural responses. Notable recent papers include:

  • Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) for auditory assessment: Validation in a young adult normal-hearing population (2020, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America)
  • The benefits of simultaneous tDCS and working memory training on transfer outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022, Brain Stimulation)
  • Expectation effects in working memory training (2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Near transfer to an unrelated N-back task mediates the effect of N-back working memory training on matrix reasoning (2022, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • N-Back Related ERPs Depend on Stimulus Type, Task Structure, Pre-processing, and Lab Factors (2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience)

Their work has appeared frequently in several academic venues, with the highest number of publications in:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (21 publications)
  • Journal of Vision (19 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (9 publications)
  • Journal of Cognitive Enhancement (4 publications)
  • American Journal of Audiology (4 publications)

Aaron R. Seitz collaborates with multiple co-authors, among whom the most frequent include:

  • Frederick J. Gallun (35 joint publications)
  • E. Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera (25 joint publications)
  • Marcello Maniglia (19 joint publications)
  • Susanne M. Jaeggi (18 joint publications)
  • Samyukta Jayakumar (16 joint publications)

The main topics covered in their research encompass diverse areas of neural and behavioral studies, with a significant emphasis on:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Multisensory perception and integration

Best Publications

  • Benefits of multisensory learning.

    Ladan Shams;Aaron R. Seitz

  • A unified model for perceptual learning

    Aaron Seitz;Takeo Watanabe

  • Is subliminal learning really passive

    Aaron R. Seitz;Takeo Watanabe

  • Rewards Evoke Learning of Unconsciously Processed Visual Stimuli in Adult Humans

    Aaron R. Seitz;Dongho Kim;Takeo Watanabe

  • A common framework for perceptual learning.

    Aaron R Seitz;Hubert R Dinse

  • Sound facilitates visual learning.

    Aaron R. Seitz;Robyn Kim;Ladan Shams

  • Testing assumptions of statistical learning: is it long-term and implicit?

    Robyn Kim;Aaron Seitz;Heather Feenstra;Ladan Shams

  • Learning what to expect (in visual perception)

    Peggy Seriès;Aaron R. Seitz

  • Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

    C. Shawn Green;Daphne Bavelier;Arthur F. Kramer;Arthur F. Kramer;Sophia Vinogradov

  • Multiple Causal Links Between Magnocellular–Dorsal Pathway Deficit and Developmental Dyslexia

    Simone Gori;Aaron R. Seitz;Luca Ronconi;Sandro Franceschini

  • Benefits of Stimulus Congruency for Multisensory Facilitation of Visual Learning

    Robyn S. Kim;Aaron R. Seitz;Ladan Shams

  • Changing beliefs and memories through dream interpretation

    Giuliana A. L. Mazzoni;Elizabeth F. Loftus;Aaron Seitz;Steven J. Lynn

  • The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning.

    Aaron R. Seitz;Takeo Watanabe

  • Improved vision and on-field performance in baseball through perceptual learning.

    Jenni Deveau;Daniel J. Ozer;Aaron R. Seitz

  • Rapidly learned stimulus expectations alter perception of motion.

    Matthew Chalk;Aaron R. Seitz;Peggy Seriès

  • Prolonged training at threshold promotes robust retinotopic specificity in perceptual learning.

    Shao-Chin Hung;Aaron R. Seitz

  • Task-irrelevant learning occurs only when the irrelevant feature is weak

    Yoshiaki Tsushima;Aaron R. Seitz;Aaron R. Seitz;Takeo Watanabe

  • What a difference a parameter makes: A psychophysical comparison of random dot motion algorithms

    Praveen K. Pilly;Aaron R. Seitz

  • Task-specific disruption of perceptual learning.

    Aaron R. Seitz;Noriko Yamagishi;Birgit Werner;Naokazu Goda

  • Laminar Development of Receptive Fields, Maps and Columns in Visual Cortex: The Coordinating Role of the Subplate

    Stephen Grossberg;Aaron Seitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Takeo Watanabe
Takeo Watanabe Brown University
Ladan Shams
Ladan Shams University of California, Los Angeles
Susanne M. Jaeggi
Susanne M. Jaeggi University of California, Irvine
Stephen M. Lawrie
Stephen M. Lawrie University of Edinburgh
Stephen Grossberg
Stephen Grossberg Boston University
Athanassios Protopapas
Athanassios Protopapas University of Oslo
Mitsuo Kawato
Mitsuo Kawato Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International
Pamela D. Butler
Pamela D. Butler Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Matti Laine
Matti Laine Åbo Akademi University
Steven M. Silverstein
Steven M. Silverstein University of Rochester Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, related fields such as psychology, counseling, and social work offer flexible online degree options and diverse career opportunities. Many students find that these fields are closely linked, with overlapping coursework and complementary career outcomes.

For those seeking a faster route to graduation, accelerated social work degree programs and accelerated psychology degree programs let you earn your qualifications quickly while developing skills relevant to neuroscience, behavioral science, and mental health support.

If you’re interested in counseling, consider exploring cacrep accredited online counseling programs. These programs meet strict accreditation standards and can greatly improve your job prospects. For those just beginning, pursuing a counseling bachelor's degree online can provide a strong foundation for advanced study or immediate employment in human services.

By choosing degrees in related disciplines online, students gain the flexibility to balance studies with work or family commitments—while positioning themselves for rewarding careers at the intersection of neuroscience and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Aaron R. Seitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles