World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7954 7422 163 161 145 6332

Giuliana Mazzoni publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Giuliana Mazzoni between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Giuliana Mazzoni published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2014. 25 of the 194 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2014. 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 12 publications
1987 2025

194 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Giuliana Mazzoni: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 3
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 4
1997 2
1998 4
1999 5
2000 2
2001 2
2002 5
2003 3
2004 4
2005 2
2006 5
2007 9
2008 7
2009 7
2010 7
2011 6
2012 7
2013 4
2014 14
2015 4
2016 3
2017 6
2018 5
2019 5
2020 5
2021 9
2022 14
2023 8
2024 13
2025 12
Total 194
Download as CSV

Giuliana Mazzoni publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuliana Mazzoni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 145 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 145
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Giuliana Mazzoni D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuliana Mazzoni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Giuliana Mazzoni is affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research spans primarily the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a substantial focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and related subfields.

Their work covers various areas within psychology, especially the study of memory and cognitive processes. Mazzoni has contributed extensively to the understanding of memory mechanisms as well as social and developmental psychology topics.

Key topics of research include:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Their frequent coauthors reflect collaborations with researchers active in overlapping areas of study, including:

  • Mara Stockner
  • Michela Marchetti
  • Daniele Gatti
  • Gianmarco Convertino
  • Jessica Talbot

A selection of recent papers illustrates the range and focus of their research contributions:

  • "Smartphone addiction across the lifetime during Italian lockdown for COVID-19", 2021, Journal of Addictive Diseases
  • "Cerebellum and semantic memory: A TMS study using the DRM paradigm", 2020, Cortex
  • "Decomposing the semantic processes underpinning veridical and false memories.", 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "Learning pain from others: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia induced by observational learning", 2023, Pain
  • "Do intuitive ideas of the qualities that should characterize involuntary and voluntary memories affect their classification?", 2021, Psychological Research

Publications by Mazzoni have appeared frequently in specific venues known for psychological and neuroscientific research:

  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • British Journal of Psychology
  • Psychological Research
  • Journal of Pain

Their contribution to different areas of cognitive neuroscience is evidenced by work that intersects memory studies with neural and social psychological perspectives. This multidisciplinary approach extends to experimental methods examining both voluntary and involuntary memory processes and the neural mechanisms underlying these phenomena.

Best Publications

  • Changing beliefs about implausible autobiographical events: A little plausibility goes a long way.

    Giuliana A. L. Mazzoni;Elizabeth F. Loftus;Irving Kirsch

  • Imagination Can Create False Autobiographical Memories

    Giuliana Mazzoni;Amina Memon

  • Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity

    William J. McGeown;Giuliana Mazzoni;Annalena Venneri;Annalena Venneri;Irving Kirsch

  • Plausibility and belief in autobiographical memory

    Alan Scoboria;Giuliana Mazzoni;Irving Kirsch;Mark Relyea

  • Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective?

    Giuliana Mazzoni;Cesare Cornoldi

  • JUDGMENTS OF LEARNING ARE AFFECTED BY THE KIND OF ENCODING IN WAYS THAT CANNOT BE ATTRIBUTED TO THE LEVEL OF RECALL

    Giuliana Mazzoni;Thomas O. Nelson

  • Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation?

    Giuliana Mazzoni;Cesare Cornoldi;Giampiera Marchitelli

  • Changing beliefs and memories through dream interpretation

    Giuliana A. L. Mazzoni;Elizabeth F. Loftus;Aaron Seitz;Steven J. Lynn

  • Applied Metacognition: Autobiographical memories and beliefs: a preliminary metacognitive model

    Giuliana Mazzoni;Irving Kirsh

  • New directions in hypnosis research: strategies for advancing the cognitive and clinical neuroscience of hypnosis

    Mark P Jensen;Graham A Jamieson;Antoine Lutz;Giuliana Mazzoni

  • The Role of Belief in Occurrence Within Autobiographical Memory

    Alan Scoboria;Dennis L. Jackson;Jennifer Talarico;Maciej Hanczakowski

  • Metacognition and Cognitive Neuropsychology : Monitoring and Control Processes

    Giuliana Mazzoni;Thomas O. Nelson

  • False claims about false memory research.

    Kimberley A. Wade;Stefanie J. Sharman;Maryanne Garry;Amina Memon

  • Word recall correlates with sleep cycles in elderly subjects.

    G. Mazzoni;S. Gori;G. Formicola;C. Gneri

  • Creating non-believed memories for recent autobiographical events.

    Andrew Clark;Robert A. Nash;Gabrielle Fincham;Giuliana Mazzoni

  • Illness by Suggestion: Expectancy, Modeling, and Gender in the Production of Psychosomatic Symptoms.

    William Lorber;Giuliana Mazzoni;Irving Kirsch

  • Immediate and persisting effects of misleading questions and hypnosis on memory reports.

    Alan Scoboria;Giuliana Mazzoni;Irving Kirsch;Leonard S. Milling

  • Suggested visual hallucination without hypnosis enhances activity in visual areas of the brain.

    William J. McGeown;Annalena Venneri;Irving Kirsch;Luca Nocetti

  • Hypnotic suggestibility, cognitive inhibition, and dissociation.

    Zoltán Dienes;Elizabeth Brown;Sam Hutton;Irving Kirsch

  • Visual object imagery and autobiographical memory: Object Imagers are better at remembering their personal past

    Manila Vannucci;Claudia Pelagatti;Carlo Chiorri;Giuliana Mazzoni

  • On the Existence and Implications of Nonbelieved Memories

    Henry Otgaar;Alan Scoboria;Giuliana Mazzoni

Frequent Co-Authors

Irving Kirsch
Irving Kirsch Harvard University
Elizabeth F. Loftus
Elizabeth F. Loftus University of California, Irvine
Annalena Venneri
Annalena Venneri Brunel University London
Thomas O. Nelson
Thomas O. Nelson University of Maryland, College Park
Claudia M.B. Carvalho
Claudia M.B. Carvalho Pacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute
Amina Memon
Amina Memon Royal Holloway University of London
Zoltan Dienes
Zoltan Dienes University of Sussex
Cesare Cornoldi
Cesare Cornoldi University of Padua
Timothy J. Perfect
Timothy J. Perfect Plymouth University
Isabel Leal
Isabel Leal ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up flexible options for diverse learners. Many universities now offer accredited programs that allow students to pursue their studies remotely, catering to both new students and working professionals. These programs can range from bachelor's to doctorate levels, each with unique advantages tailored to your interests and career goals.

For those starting their academic journey, you may want to check the easiest online psychology bachelor's degrees in Houston. These programs provide foundational knowledge and can often be completed at your own pace. Graduate students looking to advance their expertise may consider the easiest online psychology master's in California or explore the Pennsylvania easiest psychology master's degree online for flexible, convenient study options.

Ambitious professionals aiming for leadership roles or specialized practice can research the easiest online doctorate in psychology degree programs in America. These degrees can unlock advanced career pathways, from clinical practice to academic research. With numerous accredited online offerings, there are versatile opportunities to shape your future in psychology, regardless of where you live.

Best Scientists Citing Giuliana Mazzoni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles