D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 47 Citations 14,640 80 World Ranking 3768 National Ranking 2159

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Recall

His primary areas of investigation include Recall, Cognitive psychology, Metamemory, Metacognition and Developmental psychology. His research on Recall often connects related areas such as Verbal learning. He focuses mostly in the field of Cognitive psychology, narrowing it down to topics relating to Social psychology and, in certain cases, Test.

His Metamemory research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Machine learning and Metacomprehension. The study incorporates disciplines such as Nonparametric statistics, Artificial intelligence, Communication and Test validity in addition to Metacomprehension. His work deals with themes such as Control, Affect, Distributed Practice and Memory performance, which intersect with Metacognition.

His most cited work include:

  • A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions (786 citations)
  • Why investigate metacognition (483 citations)
  • When People's Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect” (442 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Cognitive psychology, Recall, Social psychology, Metamemory and Metacognition. His work carried out in the field of Cognitive psychology brings together such families of science as Semantics and Long-term memory. His studies in Recall integrate themes in fields like Developmental psychology, Overlearning, Test and Affect.

His work in the fields of Feeling overlaps with other areas such as Normative, Function and Homogeneous. His work is dedicated to discovering how Metamemory, Metacomprehension are connected with Nonparametric statistics and Test validity and other disciplines. His work on Metacognitive Monitoring as part of general Metacognition study is frequently linked to Monitoring and control, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Cognitive psychology (54.41%)
  • Recall (50.00%)
  • Social psychology (29.41%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2002-2014)?

  • Cognitive psychology (54.41%)
  • Metacognition (22.06%)
  • Metamemory (27.94%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Thomas O. Nelson mostly deals with Cognitive psychology, Metacognition, Metamemory, Developmental psychology and Recall. His research integrates issues of Social psychology, Self-fulfilling prophecy and Memory performance in his study of Cognitive psychology. His Metamemory study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Calibration, Statistics, Prefrontal cortex and Cognitive neuropsychology.

His studies deal with areas such as Contrast and Affect as well as Developmental psychology. His research in Affect intersects with topics in Memoria, Experimental psychology and TRACE. Thomas O. Nelson conducted interdisciplinary study in his works that combined Recall and Monitoring and control.

Between 2002 and 2014, his most popular works were:

  • Metacognition and Cognitive Neuropsychology : Monitoring and Control Processes (50 citations)
  • How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology. (30 citations)
  • Delayed judgments of learning cause both a decrease in absolute accuracy (calibration) and an increase in relative accuracy (resolution). (24 citations)

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions

Thomas O. Nelson.
Psychological Bulletin (1984)

1222 Citations

Why investigate metacognition

Thomas O. Nelson;Louis Narens.
Metacognition (1994)

1198 Citations

When People's Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect”

Thomas O. Nelson;John Dunlosky.
Psychological Science (1991)

793 Citations

Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect

John Dunlosky;Thomas O. Nelson.
Memory & Cognition (1992)

474 Citations

Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings.

Thomas O. Nelson;Louis Narens.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (1980)

435 Citations

Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect".

Thomas O. Nelson;R. Jacob Leonesio.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition (1988)

359 Citations

Accuracy of Feeling-of-Knowing Judgments for Predicting Perceptual Identification and Relearning

Thomas O. Nelson;Daniel Gerler;Louis Narens.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General (1984)

338 Citations

Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study During Multitrial Learning

Thomas O. Nelson;John Dunlosky;Aurora Graf;Louis Narens.
Psychological Science (1994)

316 Citations

Does the Sensitivity of Judgments of Learning (JOLs) to the Effects of Various Study Activities Depend on When the JOLs Occur

John Dunlosky;Thomas O. Nelson.
Journal of Memory and Language (1994)

296 Citations

Repetition and depth of processing

Thomas O. Nelson.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (1977)

295 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Thomas O. Nelson

John Dunlosky

John Dunlosky

Kent State University

Publications: 86

Janet Metcalfe

Janet Metcalfe

Columbia University

Publications: 53

Asher Koriat

Asher Koriat

University of Haifa

Publications: 46

Christopher Hertzog

Christopher Hertzog

Georgia Institute of Technology

Publications: 40

Nate Kornell

Nate Kornell

Williams College

Publications: 34

Katherine A. Rawson

Katherine A. Rawson

Kent State University

Publications: 31

Henry L. Roediger

Henry L. Roediger

Washington University in St. Louis

Publications: 29

Robert A. Bjork

Robert A. Bjork

University of California, Los Angeles

Publications: 29

Elizabeth J. Marsh

Elizabeth J. Marsh

Duke University

Publications: 23

Alan D. Castel

Alan D. Castel

University of California, Los Angeles

Publications: 22

Claudia M. Roebers

Claudia M. Roebers

University of Bern

Publications: 22

Aaron S. Benjamin

Aaron S. Benjamin

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Publications: 22

Roger A. Dixon

Roger A. Dixon

University of Alberta

Publications: 19

Wolfgang Schneider

Wolfgang Schneider

University of Würzburg

Publications: 19

Mark A. McDaniel

Mark A. McDaniel

Washington University in St. Louis

Publications: 19

Michel Isingrini

Michel Isingrini

François Rabelais University

Publications: 17

Trending Scientists

David G. Messerschmitt

David G. Messerschmitt

University of California, Berkeley

David L. Patton

David L. Patton

Kodak (France)

Sankaran Meenakshi

Sankaran Meenakshi

Gandhigram Rural Institute

M. Saiful Islam

M. Saiful Islam

University of Oxford

Mikael S. Hedenqvist

Mikael S. Hedenqvist

Royal Institute of Technology

Ashutosh Sharma

Ashutosh Sharma

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

Hiten D. Madhani

Hiten D. Madhani

University of California, San Francisco

Peter Scheurich

Peter Scheurich

University of Stuttgart

Pascal Willis

Pascal Willis

Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris

Scot C. R. Rafkin

Scot C. R. Rafkin

Southwest Research Institute

Jochen Roeper

Jochen Roeper

Goethe University Frankfurt

Jeffrey A. Frelinger

Jeffrey A. Frelinger

University of Arizona

Federico A. Zuckermann

Federico A. Zuckermann

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Cynthia S. Goldsmith

Cynthia S. Goldsmith

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Ronan A Lyons

Ronan A Lyons

Swansea University

Gerd Leuchs

Gerd Leuchs

Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light

Something went wrong. Please try again later.