World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9400 8785 4978 4535 91 7434

Matthew G. Rhodes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew G. Rhodes between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew G. Rhodes published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2011. 12 of the 101 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2011. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications
2000 2025

101 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew G. Rhodes: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 6
2006 2
2007 1
2008 4
2009 3
2010 4
2011 10
2012 5
2013 6
2014 3
2015 9
2016 6
2017 3
2018 6
2019 4
2020 5
2021 4
2022 1
2023 2
2024 6
2025 6
Total 101
Download as CSV

Matthew G. Rhodes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew G. Rhodes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 91
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew G. Rhodes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew G. Rhodes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Matthew G. Rhodes is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States and has contributed research primarily within the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work incorporates several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, sociology and political science, and communication.

The research conducted by Rhodes spans numerous topics. Key areas of focus include memory processes and influences, visual and cognitive learning processes, neural and behavioral psychology studies, innovative teaching and learning methods, disaster management and resilience, public relations and crisis communication, as well as deception detection and forensic psychology.

Rhodes has published in multiple academic venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Memory & Cognition
  • Metacognition and Learning
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications

Frequent collaborators include Sarah J. Myers, Hannah Hausman, Dillon H. Murphy, Alan D. Castel, and Shalini Misra.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Rhodes include:

  • Information overload, stress, and emergency managerial thinking, 2020, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test, 2020, Memory & Cognition
  • The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering, 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • The Ecology of Emergency Management Work in the Digital Age, 2020, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance
  • Detecting a familiar person behind the surgical mask: recognition without identification among masked versus sunglasses-covered faces, 2022, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications

Throughout their career, Rhodes has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Flipped Classrooms: A Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice.

    Sarah J. DeLozier;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • Memory Predictions Are Influenced by Perceptual Information : Evidence for Metacognitive Illusions

    Matthew G. Rhodes;Alan D. Castel

  • The own-age bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic and theoretical review.

    Matthew G. Rhodes;Jeffrey S. Anastasi

  • An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults

    Jeffrey S. Anastasi;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • Age-related differences in performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting test: A meta-analytic review

    Matthew G. Rhodes

  • The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.

    Matthew G. Rhodes;Sarah K. Tauber

  • Instructor and student knowledge of study strategies

    Kayla Morehead;Matthew G. Rhodes;Sarah DeLozier

  • Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: depth of retrieval.

    Larry L. Jacoby;Yujiro Shimizu;Karen A. Daniels;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • The Ease-of-Processing Heuristic and the Stability Bias Dissociating Memory, Memory Beliefs, and Memory Judgments

    Nate Kornell;Matthew G. Rhodes;Alan D. Castel;Sarah K. Tauber

  • Metacognitive Illusions for Auditory Information: Effects on Monitoring and Control

    Matthew G. Rhodes;Alan D. Castel

  • The font-size effect on judgments of learning: Does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people’s beliefs about memory?

    Michael L. Mueller;John Dunlosky;Sarah K. Tauber;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • Evidence for an Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition.

    Jeffrey S. Anastasi;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • Age estimation of faces: a review†

    Matthew G. Rhodes

  • Age Differences in Depth of Retrieval: Memory for Foils.

    Larry L. Jacoby;Yujiro Shimizu;Katerina Velanova;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment

    Colleen M. Kelley;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • False Remembering in the Aged

    Larry L. Jacoby;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • The effects of a levels-of-processing manipulation on false recall.

    Matthew G. Rhodes;Jeffrey S. Anastasi

  • The Influence of fMRI Lie Detection Evidence on Juror Decision‐Making

    David P. McCabe;Alan D. Castel;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • General knowledge norms: Updated and expanded from the Nelson and Narens (1980) norms

    Sarah K. Tauber;John Dunlosky;Katherine A. Rawson;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • Distinguishing between memory illusions and actual memories using phenomenological measurements and explicit warnings.

    Jeffrey S. Anastasi;Matthew G. Rhodes;Matthew C. Burns

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan D. Castel
Alan D. Castel University of California, Los Angeles
David P. McCabe
David P. McCabe Colorado State University
Kate Kenski
Kate Kenski University of Arizona
Larry L. Jacoby
Larry L. Jacoby Washington University in St. Louis
Nate Kornell
Nate Kornell Williams College
John Dunlosky
John Dunlosky Kent State University
Kou Murayama
Kou Murayama University of Reading
Katherine A. Rawson
Katherine A. Rawson Kent State University
Clayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors University of Houston
Valérie Camos
Valérie Camos University of Fribourg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to diverse online degree options and career directions. For those aiming for clinical practice, cheapest clinical psychology graduate programs online make advanced study more accessible and affordable. These programs equip students with essential therapeutic skills while reducing overall educational costs.

For individuals looking to reach the highest academic levels, affordable online doctoral programs in psychology allow working professionals to pursue research and teaching roles without incurring heavy debt. If your interests blend mental health and organizational leadership, consider the cheapest doctorate in behavioral health leadership program, which prepares graduates for management and advocacy roles in health services.

Additionally, for those focused on community work and social services, the cheapest human services degree online offers a practical pathway into careers supporting individuals and families in need. No matter your chosen specialty, these affordable online degrees provide flexible routes to building a rewarding future in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew G. Rhodes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles