World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
12568
World Ranking
8388
National Ranking
4475

David A. Gallo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Gallo sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David A. Gallo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Gallo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Gallo is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience, medicine, and psychology, with particular focus on cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, oncology, and clinical psychology.

Their work explores topics including memory processes and influences, cancer-related molecular pathways, memory and neural mechanisms, psychedelics and drug studies, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors study, and deception detection and forensic psychology.

Recent publications by Gallo include:

  • The acute effects of psychoactive drugs on emotional episodic memory encoding, consolidation, and retrieval: A comprehensive review (2023) in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Unique effects of sedatives, dissociatives, psychedelics, stimulants, and cannabinoids on episodic memory: A review and reanalysis of acute drug effects on recollection, familiarity, and metamemory. (2023) in Psychological Review
  • Foreign language reduces false memories by increasing memory monitoring. (2023) in Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Unique Effects of Sedatives, Dissociatives, Psychedelics, Stimulants, and Cannabinoids on Episodic Memory: A Review and Reanalysis of Acute Drug Effects on Recollection, Familiarity, and Metamemory (2022) in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Adaptive measurement of cognitive function based on multidimensional item response theory (2024) in Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions

Frequent collaborators in Gallo's research include:

  • Jimmy Fourtounis
  • Rino Stocco
  • Anne Roulston
  • Manoj K. Doss
  • Harriet de Wit

Common venues for publication are:

  • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Revista médica (Colegio de Médicos y Cirujanos de Guatemala)
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Psychological Review

Best Publications

  • Overdependence on degraded gist memory in Alzheimer's disease.

    David A. Gallo;Kameron R. Shahid;Meredith A. Olson;Todd M. Solomon

  • Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

    Henry L. Roediger;Jason M. Watson;Kathleen B. McDermott;David A. Gallo

  • False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion

    David A. Gallo

  • Associative Illusions of Memory: False Memory Research in DRM and Related Tasks

    David A. Gallo

  • Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories?

    David A. Gallo;Meredith J. Roberts;John G. Seamon

  • Variability among word lists in eliciting memory illusions: evidence for associative activation and monitoring

    David A. Gallo;Henry L. Roediger

  • Processing approaches to cognition: the impetus from the levels-of-processing framework.

    Henry L. Roediger;David A. Gallo;Lisa Geraci

  • Modality effects in false recall and false recognition.

    David A. Gallo;Kathleen B. McDermott;Jenny M. Percer;Henry L. Roediger

  • Associative false recognition occurs without strategic criterion shifts.

    David A. Gallo;Henry L. Roediger;Kathleen B. McDermott

  • Creating False Memories of Words With or Without Recognition of List Items: Evidence for Nonconscious Processes

    John G. Seamon;Chun R. Luo;David A. Gallo

  • Using Recall to Reduce False Recognition: Diagnostic and Disqualifying Monitoring.

    David A. Gallo

  • Associative recognition in Alzheimer's disease: evidence for impaired recall-to-reject.

    David A. Gallo;Alison L. Sullivan;Kirk R. Daffner;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic

    David A. Gallo;Deborah M. Bell;Jonathan S. Beier;Daniel L. Schacter

  • The effects of associations and aging on illusory recollection.

    David A. Gallo;Henry L. Roediger

  • Reducing false recognition with criterial recollection tests: Distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts

    David A. Gallo;Jonathan A. Weiss;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Deep levels of processing elicit a distinctiveness heuristic: Evidence from the criterial recollection task

    David A. Gallo;Nathaniel G. Meadow;Elizabeth L. Johnson;Katherine T. Foster

  • Age-related positivity effects and autobiographical memory detail: evidence from a past/future source memory task.

    David A. Gallo;Laura E. Korthauer;Ian M. McDonough;Salom Teshale

  • Reduced False Memory after Sleep.

    Kimberly M. Fenn;David A. Gallo;Daniel Margoliash;Henry L. Roediger

  • Elevated false recollection of emotional pictures in young and older adults.

    David A. Gallo;Katherine T. Foster;Elizabeth L. Johnson

  • False memory propensity in people reporting recovered memories of past lives.

    Cynthia A. Meyersburg;Ryan Bogdan;David A. Gallo;Richard J. McNally

Frequent Co-Authors

Henry L. Roediger
Henry L. Roediger Washington University in St. Louis
Harriet de Wit
Harriet de Wit University of Chicago
Daniel L. Schacter
Daniel L. Schacter Harvard University
Leo E. Otterbein
Leo E. Otterbein Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Andrew E. Budson
Andrew E. Budson Boston University
Kathleen B. McDermott
Kathleen B. McDermott Washington University in St. Louis
Stanley Finger
Stanley Finger Washington University in St. Louis
Ryan Bogdan
Ryan Bogdan Washington University in St. Louis
Richard J. McNally
Richard J. McNally Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up flexible and accelerated learning opportunities. Many students choose quick completion options to enter the workforce sooner. For example, if you live in Arizona, you might consider the fastest online psychology degrees in Arizona for a time-efficient path.

Florida residents can also benefit from accelerated online psychology bachelor's degrees in Florida, designed to fit busy lifestyles. Similar options are available in urban centers; students in Houston can research accelerated online psychology bachelor's degrees in Houston for programs that offer both speed and flexibility.

For those in the Rocky Mountain region, exploring the fastest online psychology programs in Colorado can help you achieve your education and career goals sooner.

These accelerated online programs can lead to varied career pathways, from counseling to research or human resources. Choose your online degree carefully to align with your long-term interests and job prospects.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Gallo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles