World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
7404
World Ranking
6242
National Ranking
3378

Jason L. Hicks publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason L. Hicks sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jason L. Hicks D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason L. Hicks sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Jason L. Hicks is affiliated with Louisiana State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology with a focus on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Epidemiology, and Computer Networks and Communications.

Their work covers multiple topics centering on cognitive and psychological processes. Notable research areas include Cognitive Functions and Memory, Memory Processes and Influences, Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, as well as Age of Information Optimization.

Jason L. Hicks has contributed to recent papers that explore various aspects of memory and cognition. These include:

  • The influence of semantic context on false memories, 2021, Memory & Cognition
  • Flexible attention allocation dynamically impacts incidental encoding in prospective memory, 2021, Memory & Cognition
  • A thorough examination of cue specificity and task-appropriateness in defining focal and nonfocal prospective memory tasks, 2023, Memory

Frequent collaborators in their research have been:

  • Durna Alakbarova
  • B. Hunter Ball
  • Bethany A. Lyon
  • Juan D. Pinto
  • Megan H. Papesh

Their scholarly contributions are often published in venues including Memory & Cognition and Memory.

Jason L. Hicks was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Martin L. Bink

  • Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks

  • How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity

    Richard L. Marsh;Joshua D. Landau;Jason L. Hicks

  • Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Gabriel I. Cook;Jeffrey S. Hansen

  • Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions☆

    Jason L. Hicks;Richard L. Marsh;Gabriel I. Cook

  • Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory.

    Unknown

  • Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation

    Richard L. Marsh;Joshua D. Landau;Jason L. Hicks

  • On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Gabriel I. Cook

  • Retrieval-Induced Forgetting Occurs in Tests of Item Recognition

    Jason L. Hicks;Jeffrey J. Starns

  • An investigation of everyday prospective memory.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Joshua D. Landau

  • The activation of unrelated and canceled intentions.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Eric Shane Bryan

  • Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Gabriel I. Cook

  • The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Valerie Watson

  • Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks

  • Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring.

    Jason L. Hicks;Richard L. Marsh

  • The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory.

    Richard L. Marsh;Thomas W. Hancock;Jason L. Hicks

  • The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories.

    Jason L. Hicks;Richard L. Marsh;Edward J. Russell

  • The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring.

    Jason L. Hicks;Richard L. Marsh;Lorie Ritschel

  • Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested

    Jason L. Hicks;Richard L. Marsh

  • Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory

    J. Thadeus Meeks;Jason L. Hicks;Richard L. Marsh

  • Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory.

    Jason L. Hicks;Richard L. Marsh

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard L. Marsh
Richard L. Marsh University of Georgia
Gene A. Brewer
Gene A. Brewer Arizona State University
Katie E. Cherry
Katie E. Cherry Louisiana State University
Nader Amir
Nader Amir San Diego State University
Karl Christoph Klauer
Karl Christoph Klauer University of Freiburg
F. Joseph McClernon
F. Joseph McClernon Duke University
Simon Farrell
Simon Farrell University of Western Australia
Gary L. Wells
Gary L. Wells Iowa State University
Laura Mickes
Laura Mickes University of Bristol
Alex S. Cohen
Alex S. Cohen Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a psychology career online offers flexibility, but it’s important to explore whether are online psychology degrees legitimate? Accredited online psychology programs are increasingly respected by employers, especially when earned from reputable institutions. Always check accreditation before enrolling.

Students often wonder about the differences between a what is the difference between ba and bs in psychology. A BA typically emphasizes a broader liberal arts curriculum, while a BS often includes more science and mathematics, which may suit those interested in research or medical fields.

If you’re keen to accelerate your education and quickly move into practice, you may wish to explore the fastest online psyd programs. These intensive programs can help qualified students earn a doctoral degree in psychology in as little as three years.

Specializing in applied areas, such as behavioral analysis, is another pathway. For those passionate about working with individuals with behavioral or developmental challenges, consider reviewing the top aba graduate programs in the USA to find the right fit for your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jason L. Hicks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles