World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gilles O. Einstein

Gilles O. Einstein

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
20866
World Ranking
3474
National Ranking
1955

Gilles O. Einstein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilles O. Einstein sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gilles O. Einstein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilles O. Einstein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gilles O. Einstein is affiliated with Furman University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on psychology and social sciences, with particular attention to developmental and educational psychology, education, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory

Recent publications by Gilles O. Einstein include the following papers:

  • Training Learning Strategies to Promote Self-Regulation and Transfer: The Knowledge, Belief, Commitment, and Planning Framework, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Training College Students to Use Learning Strategies: A Framework and Pilot Course, 2021, Psychology Learning & Teaching
  • Foundational Basis for the Development of MEDSReM, 2021, Innovation in Aging

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Mark A. McDaniel
  • Emily Een
  • Kathleen C. Insel
  • Daniel Morrow
  • Jeannie K. Lee

Their work is often published in these venues:

  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Psychology Learning & Teaching
  • Innovation in Aging

Best Publications

  • Normal aging and prospective memory.

    Gilles O. Einstein;Mark A. McDaniel

  • Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework

    Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Relational and item-specific information in memory

    R. Reed Hunt;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Prospective Memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field

    Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Prospective memory : theory and applications

    Maria A. Brandimonte;Gilles O. Einstein;Mark A. McDaniel

  • Aging and prospective memory: examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes.

    Gilles O. Einstein;Mark A. McDaniel;Sarah L. Richardson;Melissa J. Guynn

  • Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

    Gilles O. Einstein;Mark A. McDaniel;Ruthann Thomas;Sara Mayfield

  • Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings.

    Gilles O. Einstein;Mark A. McDaniel

  • "Brain-specific" nutrients: a memory cure?

    Mark A. McDaniel;Steven F. Maier;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing.

    Gilles O. Einstein;R. Reed Hunt

  • Prospective Memory Multiple Retrieval Processes

    Gilles O. Einstein;Mark A. McDaniel

  • Age-related deficits in prospective memory: the influence of task complexity.

    Gilles O. Einstein;Lindsay J. Holland;Mark A. McDaniel;Melissa J. Guynn

  • Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

    Mark A. McDaniel;Melissa J. Guynn;Gilles O. Einstein;Jennifer Breneiser

  • Prospective Memory : Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives

    Matthias Kliegel;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Aging and Prospective Memory: The Influence of Increased Task Demands at Encoding and Retrieval

    Gilles O. Einstein;Rebekah E. Smith;Mark A. McDaniel;Pat Shaw

  • Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness.

    Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information.

    Gilles O. Einstein;Joy Morris;Susan Smith

  • Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: A new approach and age-related effects

    Matthias Kliegel;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Complex prospective memory and executive control of working memory: A process model.

    Matthias Kliegel;Mike Martin;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: Differential effects across time - and event-based prospective memory

    Matthias Kliegel;Mike Martin;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. McDaniel
Mark A. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Matthias Kliegel
Matthias Kliegel University of Geneva
Michael K. Scullin
Michael K. Scullin Baylor University
Daniel G. Morrow
Daniel G. Morrow University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mike Martin
Mike Martin University of Zurich
Steven F. Maier
Steven F. Maier University of Colorado Boulder
R. Reed Hunt
R. Reed Hunt University of Mississippi
Julie M. Bugg
Julie M. Bugg Washington University in St. Louis
Peter G. Rendell
Peter G. Rendell University of Queensland
Larry L. Jacoby
Larry L. Jacoby Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree programs and a range of rewarding career pathways. Many students pursue specialized graduate degrees, including those leading to roles as Marriage and Family Therapists (MFTs). Understanding the steps to licensure is crucial, as requirements can vary significantly by state and even by city.

For example, if you are curious about how to become an mft in Tampa, you’ll find there are specific education and supervised experience expectations. Similarly, mft requirements in Toledo include comprehensive coursework and passing rigorous exams. Each location puts its unique stamp on the certification process.

For those interested in the Southwest, Tucson mft certification requirements emphasize supervised clinical practice and ongoing professional development. In another region, exploring how to become a marriage and family therapist in Tulsa will reveal insights into the state’s credentialing structure.

Whether you plan to practice therapy, counsel others, or explore academic research, online psychology degrees offer flexible routes to success. Be sure to investigate local licensing rules to map out your ideal career path.

Best Scientists Citing Gilles O. Einstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles