World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
79
Citations
19541
World Ranking
1532
National Ranking
16

Matthias Kliegel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Kliegel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 437 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthias Kliegel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Kliegel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias Kliegel is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland. Their research focuses on psychology and medicine, with significant contributions in experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and cognitive neuroscience. Their work extends into health and clinical psychology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach.

Their research covers several main topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Age of Information Optimization
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception

Kliegel has been published extensively in various scientific journals. The frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • European Journal of Ageing
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Psychology and Aging
  • BMC Geriatrics

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Kliegel include:

  • "Train the brain with music (TBM): brain plasticity and cognitive benefits induced by musical training in elderly people in Germany and Switzerland, a study protocol for an RCT comparing musical instrumental practice to sensitization to music" (2020, BMC Geriatrics)
  • "Bidirectional Association between Physical Activity and Dopamine Across Adulthood-A Systematic Review" (2021, Brain Sciences)
  • "Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults and Older Adults from Amazonas, Brazil" (2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • "Predicting Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Machine Learning Approach" (2020, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease)
  • "Prospective Memory Development Across the Lifespan" (2020, European Psychologist)

Throughout their career, Kliegel has collaborated frequently with several researchers. Notable coauthors include:

  • Andreas Ihle
  • Sascha Zuber
  • Alexandra Hering
  • Nicola Ballhausen
  • Élvio Rúbio Gouveia

Best Publications

  • Prospective Memory : Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives

    Matthias Kliegel;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: A new approach and age-related effects

    Matthias Kliegel;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Complex prospective memory and executive control of working memory: A process model.

    Matthias Kliegel;Mike Martin;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: Differential effects across time - and event-based prospective memory

    Matthias Kliegel;Mike Martin;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Working memory training and transfer in older adults: Effects of age, baseline performance, and training gains

    Katharina Zinke;Melanie Zeintl;Nathan S. Rose;Julia Putzmann

  • The involvement of executive functions in prospective memory performance of adults

    Mike Martin;Matthias Kliegel;Mark A. McDaniel

  • Cold simple intravenous infusions preceding special endovascular cooling for faster induction of mild hypothermia after cardiac arrest--a feasibility study.

    Andreas Kliegel;Heidrun Losert;Fritz Sterz;Matthias Kliegel

  • Adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: a meta-analysis on the role of focal versus nonfocal cues.

    Matthias Kliegel;Theodor Jäger;Louise H. Phillips

  • Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks.

    Matthias Kliegel;Mike Martin;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

    C. Shawn Green;Daphne Bavelier;Arthur F. Kramer;Arthur F. Kramer;Sophia Vinogradov

  • Prospective memory research: Why is it relevant?

    Matthias Kliegel;Mike Martin

  • Cold infusions alone are effective for induction of therapeutic hypothermia but do not keep patients cool after cardiac arrest.

    Andreas Kliegel;Andreas Janata;Cosima Wandaller;Thomas Uray

  • The role of shifting, updating, and inhibition in prospective memory performance in young and older adults.

    Katharina M. Schnitzspahn;Christoph Stahl;Melanie Zeintl;Christoph P. Kaller

  • A process-model based approach to prospective memory impairment in Parkinson's disease.

    Matthias Kliegel;Mareike Altgassen;Alexandra Hering;Nathan S. Rose

  • Age and individual differences in prospective memory during a "Virtual Week": the roles of working memory, vigilance, task regularity, and cue focality.

    Nathan S. Rose;Peter G. Rendell;Mark A. McDaniel;Ingo Aberle

  • Changes in self-regulatory cognitions as predictors of changes in smoking and nutrition behaviour

    Urte Scholz;Gabriel Nagy;Wiebke Göhner;Aleksandra Luszczynska

  • Prospective memory in schizophrenia: Primary or secondary impairment?

    Julie D. Henry;Peter G. Rendell;Matthias Kliegel;Mareike Altgassen

  • Development of Affective Theory of Mind Across Adolescence: Disentangling the Role of Executive Functions

    Nora C Vetter;Mareike Altgassen;Louise Phillips;Caitlin E V Mahy

  • Planning and realization of complex intentions in traumatic brain injury and normal aging.

    Matthias Kliegel;Anne Eschen;Angelika I.T. Thöne-Otto

  • Differential effects of age on involuntary and voluntary autobiographical memory

    Simone Schlagman;Matthias Kliegel;Jorg Schulz;Lia Kvavilashvili

Frequent Co-Authors

Mareike Altgassen
Mareike Altgassen Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Mike Martin
Mike Martin University of Zurich
Peter G. Rendell
Peter G. Rendell University of Queensland
Stéphane Cullati
Stéphane Cullati University of Fribourg
Louise H. Phillips
Louise H. Phillips University of Aberdeen
Julie D. Henry
Julie D. Henry University of Queensland
Boris Cheval
Boris Cheval École Normale Supérieure de Rennes
Daniel Zimprich
Daniel Zimprich University of Ulm
Mark A. McDaniel
Mark A. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Hermann Brenner
Hermann Brenner German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a degree in Psychology in the USA, it's important to be aware of the various career paths and online degree options available. Many students explore specialized fields, such as behavior analysis, which require specific credentials. An increasingly popular pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Requirements for this role may vary by location and typically include earning a relevant graduate degree, completing supervised fieldwork, and passing a certification exam.

For example, aspiring professionals can review Virginia Beach bcba education requirements to understand what steps are needed in that region. Similarly, you can explore Washington DC bcba requirements or see what's necessary in other locations like Wichita bcba requirements or how to become a bcba in Winston Salem.

Online degrees in psychology and behavior analysis offer flexibility and accessibility, making them a practical choice for working professionals. Understanding each state's certification process is crucial to align your studies with future career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Kliegel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles