World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5122
World Ranking
9868
National Ranking
973

Lia Kvavilashvili publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lia Kvavilashvili sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lia Kvavilashvili D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lia Kvavilashvili sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lia Kvavilashvili is affiliated with the University of Hertfordshire in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their research focuses mainly on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology, with additional work touching on Clinical Psychology and Computer Networks and Communications.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Mind wandering and attention
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Age of Information Optimization

Kvavilashvili has authored numerous research papers published in several notable venues. Frequent publication venues for their work include Memory and Consciousness and Cognition, with additional contributions to Review of General Psychology, Nature Reviews Psychology, and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Kvavilashvili are:

  • On the Nature of Everyday Prospection: A Review and Theoretical Integration of Research on Mind-Wandering, Future Thinking, and Prospective Memory (2020), published in Review of General Psychology
  • Deficits in Spontaneous Cognition as an Early Marker of Alzheimer's Disease (2020), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Current theories of prospective memory and new directions for theory development (2022), published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Prospective memories in the wild: Predicting memory for intentions in natural environments (2022), published in Memory & Cognition
  • Comparing music- and food-evoked autobiographical memories in young and older adults: A diary study (2023), published in British Journal of Psychology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Krystian Barzykowski
  • Jan Rummel
  • Ioanna Markostamou
  • Agnieszka Niedźwieńska
  • Ruth M. Ford

Overall, Kvavilashvili's body of work contributes to advancing understanding within various subfields of psychology related to memory, cognition, mind wandering, and neuropsychological conditions. Their collaboration with multiple researchers and presence in diverse high-impact journals highlights an active and interdisciplinary research profile.

Best Publications

  • Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications.

    Lia Kvavilashvili;Judi Ellis

  • Prospective Memory in 2000: Past, Present, and Future Directions

    Judi Ellis;Lia Kvavilashvili

  • Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory

    Lia Kvavilashvili

  • Out of One's Mind: A Study of Involuntary Semantic Memories.

    Lia Kvavilashvili;George Mandler;George Mandler

  • Involuntary autobiographical memories in and outside the laboratory: how different are they from voluntary autobiographical memories?

    Simone Schlagman;Lia Kvavilashvili

  • Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals Role of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age and motivation

    Lia Kvavilashvili;Laura Fisher

  • Prospective memory in children: The effects of age and task interruption.

    Lia Kvavilashvili;David J. Messer;Pippa Ebdon

  • A content analysis of involuntary autobiographical memories: examining the positivity effect in old age.

    Simone Schlagman;Joerg Schulz;Lia Kvavilashvili

  • Differential effects of age on involuntary and voluntary autobiographical memory

    Simone Schlagman;Matthias Kliegel;Jorg Schulz;Lia Kvavilashvili

  • Remembering intentions: A critical review of existing experimental paradigms

    Lia Kvavilashvili

  • Comparing flashbulb memories of September 11 and the death of Princess Diana: effects of time delays and nationality

    Lia Kvavilashvili;Jennifer Mirani;Simone Schlagman;Diana E. Kornbrot

  • I Suppress, Therefore I Smoke Effects of Thought Suppression on Smoking Behavior

    James A.K. Erskine;George J. Georgiou;Lia Kvavilashvili

  • Differential effects of age on prospective and retrospective memory tasks in young, young-old, and old-old adults

    Lia Kvavilashvili;Diana E Kornbrot;Veronica Mash;Janet Cockburn

  • Ecological validity and twenty years of real-life/laboratory controversy in memory research: A critical (and historical) review

    L. Kvavilashvili;J. Ellis

  • The development of prospective memory in children : Methodological issues, empirical findings, and future directions

    Lia Kvavilashvili;Fiona E. Kyle;David J. Messer

  • Role of triggers and dysphoria in mind-wandering about past, present and future: A laboratory study.

    Benjamin Plimpton;Priya Patel;Lia Kvavilashvili

  • Effects of Age on Involuntary Autobiographical Memories

    Simone Schlagman;Lia Kvavilashvili;Joerg Schulz

  • The predictors of thought suppression in young and old adults: Effects of rumination, anxiety, and other variables.

    James A.K. Erskine;Lia Kvavilashvili;Diana E. Kornbrot

  • Experimental tests of prospective remembering: the influence of cue-event frequency on performance.

    Judi Ellis;Lia Kvavilashvili;Alan Milne

  • On the Nature of Everyday Prospection: A Review and Theoretical Integration of Research on Mind-Wandering, Future Thinking, and Prospective Memory:

    Lia Kvavilashvili;Jan Rummel

  • Involuntary autobiographical memories

    Rosemary J. Bradley;Chris J. A. Moulin;Lia Kvavilashvili

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith R. Laws
Keith R. Laws University of Hertfordshire
David Messer
David Messer The Open University
Lynn B. Myers
Lynn B. Myers Brunel University London
Alan B. Milne
Alan B. Milne University of Aberdeen
George Mandler
George Mandler University of California, San Diego
Matthias Kliegel
Matthias Kliegel University of Geneva
Chris J. A. Moulin
Chris J. A. Moulin Grenoble Alpes University
Mareike Altgassen
Mareike Altgassen Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Martin A. Conway
Martin A. Conway City, University of London
Sam J. Gilbert
Sam J. Gilbert University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in psychology, exploring online degrees in counseling and related fields can open diverse career pathways. Online psychology and counseling programs offer flexibility and accessibility, making it easier for students to balance their studies with work or family commitments.

Affordability is a key factor when choosing an online degree. There are many options across the U.S., with popular cities like Saint Louis and Saint Paul offering some of the cheapest counseling programs in Saint Louis and cheapest counseling degrees in Saint Paul for aspiring psychology professionals.

In addition, West Coast students can benefit from the most affordable counseling degree programs in San Diego and cheapest counseling degrees in Seattle. Many of these programs are available fully online, allowing students nationwide to pursue their goals in mental health, education, or private practice.

When searching for the right degree, consider tuition costs, accreditation, and your long-term career interests—whether it’s clinical counseling, research, or community outreach. Pick a pathway that best fits your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Lia Kvavilashvili

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles