World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
5254
World Ranking
10181
National Ranking
1000

Lynn B. Myers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn B. Myers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 85 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lynn B. Myers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn B. Myers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lynn B. Myers was affiliated with Brunel University London in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions focused primarily on the fields of Medicine and Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with particular attention to various subfields such as Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, and Oncology.

Their scholarly output addressed a range of topics including chronic disease management strategies, diabetes treatment and management, cancer survivorship and care, and economic and financial impacts related to cancer. Additionally, their work explored health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life measures, and hemoglobinopathies and related disorders.

The following papers highlight key aspects of their research:

  • "Pragmatic Trial of Hospitalization Rate in Chronic Kidney Disease," 2024, published in the New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Applying Lean Six Sigma to Improve Depression Screening and Follow-Up in Oncology Clinics," 2021, published in the Journal for Healthcare Quality
  • "Development of the Thalassaemia Adult Life Index (ThALI)," 2020, published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Lynn B. Myers collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Miguel Vazquez, Gretchen D. Oliver, Ruben Amarasingham, Venkatraghavan Sundaram, and Kevin Chan. These collaborations spanned their diverse research interests.

Their publications appeared in a variety of academic venues, primarily:

  • New England Journal of Medicine
  • Journal for Healthcare Quality
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Throughout their career, the focus remained on producing research that bridged clinical medicine with health quality and economic considerations. Their contributions encompassed clinical trials, quality improvement methodologies, and the development of patient-centered outcome measures within medical research contexts.

Best Publications

  • Illness perceptions and self efficacy beliefs in adolescents and young adults with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

    Konstadina Griva;Lynn B. Myers;Stanton Newman

  • 'It's difficult being a dentist': stress and health in the general dental practitioner

    H L Myers;L B Myers

  • Adherence to Treatment in Medical Conditions

    Lynn Myers;Kenny Midence

  • Emotional information processing in repressors: The vigilance–avoidance theory

    Nazanin Derakshan;Michael W. Eysenck;Lynn B. Myers

  • Initial psychological responses to Influenza A, H1N1 ("Swine flu").

    Robin Goodwin;Shamsul Haque;Felix Neto;Lynn B Myers

  • Determinants of adults' intention to vaccinate against pandemic swine flu

    Lynn B Myers;Robin Goodwin

  • Repressive coping and the directed forgetting of emotional material.

    Lynn B. Myers;Chris R. Brewin;Mick J. Power

  • How do patients who participate in cancer support groups differ from those who do not

    Gunn E. Grande;L. B. Myers;S. R. Sutton

  • Recall of early experience and the repressive coping style.

    Lynn B. Myers;Chris R. Brewin

  • The importance of the repressive coping style: findings from 30 years of research

    Lynn B. Myers

  • Initial psychological responses to swine flu.

    Robin Goodwin;Stanley O. Gaines;Lynn Myers;Felix Neto

  • Illusions of well-being and the repressive coping style

    Lynn B. Myers;Chris R. Brewin

  • Social cognitive predictors of sun protection intention and behavior.

    Lynn B. Myers;Mark S. Horswill

  • To forget or not to forget: What do repressors forget and when do they forget?

    Lynn B. Myers;Nazanin Derakshan

  • Concepts and issues in adherence.

    Lynn B. Myers;Kenny Midence

  • Identifying repressors: A methodological issue for health psychology

    Lynn B. Myers

  • The colour naming of socially threatening words.

    Lynn B. Myers;Frank P. McKenna

  • Illusory self-assessments--can they be reduced?

    Frank P. McKenna;Lynn B. Myers

  • Psychological correlates of adherence to medication in asthma

    B. Byer;Lynn B. Myers

  • The role of illness beliefs, treatment beliefs, and perceived severity of symptoms in explaining distress in cancer patients during chemotherapy treatment.

    Ingela C V Thuné-Boyle;Lynn B Myers;Stanton P Newman

Frequent Co-Authors

Stanton Newman
Stanton Newman City, University of London
Nazanin Derakshan
Nazanin Derakshan Birkbeck, University of London
Chris R. Brewin
Chris R. Brewin University College London
Robin Goodwin
Robin Goodwin University of Warwick
Michael W. Eysenck
Michael W. Eysenck Royal Holloway University of London
Lia Kvavilashvili
Lia Kvavilashvili University of Hertfordshire
Félix Neto
Félix Neto University of Porto
Mark S. Horswill
Mark S. Horswill University of Queensland
Mick Power
Mick Power National University of Singapore
Stephen Sutton
Stephen Sutton University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees offers significant flexibility for students with busy schedules or work commitments. Numerous accredited programs across the USA deliver high-quality curriculum and faculty support, making it easier than ever to start your psychology education from anywhere.

Many states are home to top-ranked online options. For example, students can view the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in Illinois and compare unique program features and admission requirements. Similarly, there are insights into the best online bachelor's in psychology degree programs ranking in New York as well as detailed lists of online psychology bachelor's programs in Pennsylvania.

Aspiring psychologists on the West Coast can benefit from resources like the best online psychology program rankings in California, which highlights top institutions and informs students about diverse study options.

Graduates of these programs can pursue roles in counseling, social work, business, or continue toward advanced psychology degrees—all through online and hybrid learning pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Lynn B. Myers

Recently Published Articles