World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7990 7458 476 465 123 5757

Melissa K. Hyde publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Melissa K. Hyde between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Melissa K. Hyde published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2012. 19 of the 157 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2012. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 15 publications
2007 2025

157 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Melissa K. Hyde: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 7
2009 9
2010 6
2011 7
2012 17
2013 15
2014 15
2015 9
2016 8
2017 13
2018 10
2019 4
2020 4
2021 8
2022 1
2023 3
2024 4
2025 15
Total 157
Download as CSV

Melissa K. Hyde publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa K. Hyde sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 123
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Melissa K. Hyde D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa K. Hyde sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Melissa K. Hyde is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily Medicine and Social Sciences, with significant emphasis on subfields such as Management of Technology and Innovation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology, and Health.

The research topics explored by Melissa K. Hyde include:

  • Blood donation and transfusion practices
  • Organ donation and transplantation
  • Religion, spirituality, and psychology
  • Halal products and consumer behavior
  • Blood transfusion and management
  • Nonprofit sector and volunteering
  • Tourism, volunteerism, and development

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Transfusion
  • Transfusion Medicine
  • Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Annals of Oncology

Melissa K. Hyde has coauthored extensively with several researchers. Those frequently collaborating with them are:

  • Barbara Masser
  • Rachel Thorpe
  • Cher Bass
  • Foivos Ntelemis
  • André Geraldes

Select recent research papers authored by Melissa K. Hyde include:

  • "Exploring predictors of Australian community members' blood donation intentions and blood donation-related behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), published in Transfusion
  • "Physical activity behaviour change in people living with and beyond cancer following an exercise intervention: a systematic review" (2023), published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
  • "A review of whole-blood donors' willingness, motives, barriers and interventions related to donating another substance of human origin" (2022), published in Transfusion Medicine
  • "Men's sexual help-seeking and care needs after radical prostatectomy or other non-hormonal, active prostate cancer treatments" (2020), published in Supportive Care in Cancer
  • "Designing Organisational Management Frameworks to Empower Episodic Volunteering" (2020), published in VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations

Best Publications

  • Dialling and driving: factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving

    Shari P. Walsh;Katherine M. White;Melissa K. Hyde;Barry C. Watson

  • The Psychology of Blood Donation: Current Research and Future Directions

    Barbara M. Masser;Katherine M. White;Melissa K. Hyde;Deborah J. Terry

  • Predicting blood donation intentions and behavior among Australian blood donors: testing an extended theory of planned behavior model

    Barbara M. Masser;Katherine M. White;Melissa K. Hyde;Deborah J. Terry

  • Predictors of Young People's Charitable Intentions to Donate Money: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective

    Simon R. Knowles;Melissa K. Hyde;Katherine M. White

  • Mobile phone use while driving: An investigation of the beliefs influencing drivers' hands-free and hand-held mobile phone use

    Katherine M. White;Melissa K. Hyde;Shari P. Walsh;Barry C. Watson

  • To Be a Donor or Not to Be? Applying an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Posthumous Organ Donation Intentions

    Melissa K. Hyde;Katherine M. White

  • Episodic volunteering and retention: An integrated theoretical approach

    Melissa Hyde;Melissa Hyde;Jeffrey Dunn;Jeffrey Dunn;Jeffrey Dunn;Caitlin Ann Bax;Suzanne Kathleen Chambers

  • A further exploration of sensation seeking propensity, reward sensitivity, depression, anxiety, and the risky behaviour of young novice drivers in a structural equation model

    Bridie J. Scott-Parker;Barry C. Watson;Mark J. King;Melissa K. Hyde

  • Speeding by young novice drivers: What can personal characteristics and psychosocial theory add to our understanding?

    Bridie J. Scott-Parker;Melissa K. Hyde;Barry C. Watson;Mark J. King

  • Trajectories of quality of life, life satisfaction, and psychological adjustment after prostate cancer

    Suzanne K. Chambers;Shu Kay Ng;Peter Baade;Peter Baade;Joanne F. Aitken

  • The Role of Self-Perceptions in the Prediction of Household Recycling Behavior in Australia:

    Katherine M. White;Melissa K. Hyde

  • Predicting intentions to donate blood among nondonors in Australia: an extended theory of planned behavior

    Natalie G. Robinson;Barbara M. Masser;Katherine M. White;Melissa K. Hyde

  • Erectile dysfunction, masculinity, and psychosocial outcomes: a review of the experiences of men after prostate cancer treatment

    Suzanne K. Chambers;Eric Chung;Gary Wittert;Melissa K. Hyde

  • Attitude-behavior consistency, the principle of compatibility, and organ donation: a classic innovation

    Jason T. Siegel;Mario A. Navarro;Cara N. Tan;Melissa K. Hyde

  • Understanding the factors influencing safe and unsafe motorcycle rider intentions

    Deborah J. Tunnicliff;Barry C. Watson;Katherine M. White;Melissa K. Hyde

  • The impact of changes to the graduated driver licensing program in Queensland, Australia on the experiences of Learner drivers

    Bridie J. Scott-Parker;Lyndel Judith Bates;Barry C. Watson;Mark J. King

  • What predicts Australian university students’ intentions to volunteer their time for community service?

    Melissa K. Hyde;Simon R. Knowles

  • "They're lunatics on the road": Exploring the normative influences of parents, friends, and police on young novices' risky driving decisions

    Bridie J. Scott-Parker;Barry C. Watson;Mark J. King;Melissa K. Hyde

  • Use of online health information to manage children’s health care: a prospective study investigating parental decisions

    Anne M Walsh;Kyra Hamilton;Katherine M White;Melissa K Hyde

  • Systematic review of motives for episodic volunteering

    Jeff Dunn;Jeff Dunn;Jeff Dunn;Suzanne K. Chambers;Melissa K. Hyde;Melissa K. Hyde

  • The influence of sensitivity to reward and punishment, propensity for sensation seeking, depression, and anxiety on the risky behaviour of novice drivers: A path model

    Bridie J. Scott-Parker;Barry C. Watson;Mark J. King;Melissa K. Hyde

Frequent Co-Authors

Katherine M. White
Katherine M. White Queensland University of Technology
Jeff Dunn
Jeff Dunn University of Southern Queensland
Barry C. Watson
Barry C. Watson Queensland University of Technology
Suzanne K. Chambers
Suzanne K. Chambers University of Technology Sydney
Joanne F. Aitken
Joanne F. Aitken Cancer Council Queensland
Stefano Occhipinti
Stefano Occhipinti Griffith University
John L. Oliffe
John L. Oliffe University of British Columbia
Deborah J. Terry
Deborah J. Terry University of Queensland
Ross McD. Young
Ross McD. Young University of the Sunshine Coast
Kyra Hamilton
Kyra Hamilton Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways, particularly in fields like social work, counseling, and behavioral health. Each state has its own educational requirements for becoming a social worker, which are important to understand if you are considering this path.

For example, aspiring professionals must be aware of the social worker degree requirements in Oklahoma, which may differ from those elsewhere. Similarly, you should review the social worker degree requirements in Oregon to understand local regulations and licensure expectations.

In Pennsylvania, understanding the Pennsylvania education requirements for social workers is essential for anyone looking to practice in that state. Likewise, exploring the social worker education requirements in Rhode Island can help you plan your academic journey efficiently.

By researching state-specific requirements and exploring flexible online degree options, you can create a customized educational pathway that best supports your career goals in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Melissa K. Hyde

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles