World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Janine Giese-Davis

Janine Giese-Davis

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
9741
World Ranking
7167
National Ranking
484

Janine Giese-Davis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janine Giese-Davis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janine Giese-Davis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janine Giese-Davis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janine Giese-Davis is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with a particular focus on Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology, and Speech and Hearing.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Cancer Survivorship and Care
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines Implementation
  • Meta-Analysis and Systematic Reviews
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

They have published in various venues, including:

  • Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology
  • BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Notable recent papers authored by Janine Giese-Davis are:

  • "Narrative-Informed, Emotion-Focused Psychotherapy in Synchronous, Online Chat Groups for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: A Proof-of-Concept Study" (2020), Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology
  • "Documenting patients' and providers' preferences when proposing a randomized controlled trial: a qualitative exploration" (2022), BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • "Correction to: Machine Learning for Identifying Emotional Expression in Text: Improving the Accuracy of Established Methods" (2020), Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
  • "Documenting Patients' and Providers' Preferences When Proposing a Randomized Controlled Trial: A Qualitative Exploration" (2021), Research Square (Research Square)
  • "Qualitative Analysis of Negative and Positive Covid-19 Pandemic Experiences for Nova Scotia Educators, Their Families, and Their Mental Health Clinicians" (2024), SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Devesh Oberoi
  • Joanne Stephen
  • Cynthia Kwok
  • Yong Li
  • Cindy Railton

Best Publications

  • Depression and cancer: mechanisms and disease progression.

    David Spiegel;Janine Giese-Davis

  • Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized clinical intervention trial.

    Catherine Classen;Lisa D. Butler;Cheryl Koopman;Elaine Miller

  • Contemplative/emotion training reduces negative emotional behavior and promotes prosocial responses.

    Margaret E Kemeny;Carol Foltz;James F Cavanagh;Margaret Cullen

  • Decrease in Depression Symptoms Is Associated With Longer Survival in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis

    Janine Giese-Davis;Kate Collie;Kate M.S. Rancourt;Eric Neri

  • Breast Cancer as Trauma: Posttraumatic Stress and Posttraumatic Growth

    Matthew J. Cordova;Janine Giese-Davis;Mitch Golant;Carol Kronenwetter

  • Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness.

    Morton A. Lieberman;Mitch Golant;Janine Giese-Davis;Andy Winzlenberg

  • Flattened cortisol rhythms in metastatic breast cancer patients

    Heather C. Abercrombie;Janine Giese-Davis;Sandra Sephton;Elissa S. Epel

  • Effects of supportive‐expressive group therapy on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer

    David Spiegel;Lisa D. Butler;Janine Giese‐Davis;Cheryl Koopman

  • Mindfulness-based cancer recovery and supportive-expressive therapy maintain telomere length relative to controls in distressed breast cancer survivors.

    Linda E. Carlson;Tara L. Beattie;Janine Giese‐Davis;Peter Faris

  • Change in emotion-regulation strategy for women with metastatic breast cancer following supportive-expressive group therapy.

    Janine Giese-Davis;Cheryl Koopman;Lisa D. Butler;Catherine Classen

  • Actigraphy-measured sleep disruption as a predictor of survival among women with advanced breast cancer.

    Oxana Palesh;Arianna Aldridge-Gerry;Jamie M Zeitzer;Cheryl Koopman

  • Traumatic Stress Symptoms Among Women with Recently Diagnosed Primary Breast Cancer

    Cheryl Koopman;Lisa D. Butler;Catherine Classen;Janine Giese-Davis

  • Quality of couples' relationship and adjustment to metastatic breast cancer.

    Janine Giese-Davis;Kaye Hermanson;Cheryl Koopman;David Weibel

  • Depression, cortisol, and suppressed cell-mediated immunity in metastatic breast cancer

    Sandra E. Sephton;Firdaus S. Dhabhar;Alex S. Keuroghlian;Janine Giese-Davis

  • What goes up does not always come down: patterns of distress, physical and psychosocial morbidity in people with cancer over a one year period.

    Linda E. Carlson;Amy Waller;Shannon L. Groff;Janine Giese-Davis;Janine Giese-Davis

  • Design decisions to optimize reliability of daytime cortisol slopes in an older population

    Helena C. Kraemer;Janine Giese-Davis;Maya Yutsis;Ruth O'Hara

  • The effect of peer counseling on quality of life following diagnosis of breast cancer: an observational study.

    Janine Giese-Davis;Caroline Bliss-Isberg;Kristin Carson;Path Star

  • Distress, coping, and social support among rural women recently diagnosed with primary breast cancer.

    Cheryl Koopman;Karyn Angell;Julie M. Turner-Cobb;Mary Anne Kreshka

  • Supportive-expressive group therapy for primary breast cancer patients: a randomized prospective multicenter trial.

    Catherine C. Classen;Helena C. Kraemer;Christine Blasey;Janine Giese-Davis

  • Mood disturbance in community cancer support groups. The role of emotional suppression and fighting spirit.

    Matthew J Cordova;Janine Giese-Davis;Mitch Golant;Carol Kronnenwetter

Frequent Co-Authors

David Spiegel
David Spiegel Stanford University
Linda E. Carlson
Linda E. Carlson University of Calgary
Helena C. Kraemer
Helena C. Kraemer Stanford University
Cheryl Koopman
Cheryl Koopman Stanford University
Sandra E. Sephton
Sandra E. Sephton University of Louisville
Catherine C. Classen
Catherine C. Classen University of Toronto
Lisa D. Butler
Lisa D. Butler University at Buffalo, State University of New York
C. Barr Taylor
C. Barr Taylor Stanford University
Frank H. Wilhelm
Frank H. Wilhelm University of Salzburg
Michael Speca
Michael Speca University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA can open doors to several rewarding careers, especially in social work and counseling. Many students choose online programs for greater flexibility and the ability to balance studies with other responsibilities.

Requirements to enter social work vary from state to state. For example, those interested in practicing in Arizona should be aware of the Arizona social work license requirements. Similarly, understanding the requirements to be a social worker in Arkansas is crucial for anyone considering career opportunities there.

California offers a broad range of pathways for psychology graduates. If you are looking into becoming a social worker in California, you’ll find specific degree, fieldwork, and exam requirements to fulfill. Meanwhile, those targeting Colorado must be aware of the requirements to be a social worker in Colorado.

Whether you pursue a bachelor’s, master’s, or online degree, carefully consider your state’s guidelines and career goals before enrolling—and remember, each pathway offers unique opportunities to make a real difference in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Janine Giese-Davis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles