World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
7691
World Ranking
4739
National Ranking
2247

Lorraine T. Midanik publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorraine T. Midanik sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 82 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Lorraine T. Midanik D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorraine T. Midanik sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lorraine T. Midanik is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their academic career includes research activity within this reputable institution, contributing to the scholarly community through various engagements over time.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are recorded in the available data, indicating a lack of detailed bibliographic information on public record for their work.

Similarly, there are no listed book publications or named fields and subfields of study associated with this researcher in the accessible data. Consequently, precise delineations of their disciplinary focus or thematic concentration remain unspecified.

There are no documented main topics of work or research themes attributed to this individual based on the source information. This absence limits insights into the specific areas of expertise or scholarly interests pursued in their academic activities.

No awards have been recorded, and the scientist is currently living, with no information implying otherwise.

Best Publications

  • The validity of self-reported alcohol consumption and alcohol problems: a literature review.

    Lorraine Midanik

  • Validity of Self‐reported Alcohol Use: a literature review and assessment*

    Lorraine T. Midanik

  • Concurrent and simultaneous drug and alcohol use: Results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey

    Lorraine T. Midanik;Tammy W. Tam;Constance Weisner;Constance Weisner

  • Reports of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems among homosexual, bisexual and heterosexual respondents: results from the 2000 National Alcohol Survey.

    Laurie Drabble;Lorraine T Midanik;Karen Trocki

  • Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption.

    Thomas K. Greenfield;Lorraine T. Midanik;John D. Rogers

  • The Effect of Retirement on Mental Health and Health Behaviors: The Kaiser Permanente Retirement Study

    Lorraine T. Midanik;Krikor Soghikian;Laura J. Ransom;Irene S. Tekawa

  • Risk functions for alcohol-related problems in a 1988 US national sample

    Lorraine T. Midanik;Tammy W. Tam;Thomas K. Greenfield;Raul Caetano

  • A 10-year national trend study of alcohol consumption, 1984-1995: is the period of declining drinking over?

    T K Greenfield;L T Midanik;J D Rogers

  • Alcohol outlets and child physical abuse and neglect: applying routine activities theory to the study of child maltreatment.

    Bridget Freisthler;Lorraine T Midanik;Paul J Gruenewald

  • “Culture of Drinking” and Individual Problems with Alcohol Use

    Jennifer Ahern;Jennifer Ahern;Jennifer Ahern;Sandro Galea;Sandro Galea;Sandro Galea;Alan Hubbard;Lorraine Midanik

  • Drunkenness, feeling the effects and 5+ measures.

    Lorraine T. Midanik

  • Tobacco, marijuana, and sensation seeking: comparisons across gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual groups.

    Karen F. Trocki;Laurie A. Drabble;Lorraine T. Midanik

  • Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey.

    Lorraine T. Midanik;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Use of heavier drinking contexts among heterosexuals, homosexuals and bisexuals: results from a National Household Probability Survey.

    Karen F Trocki;Laurie Drabble;Lorraine Midanik

  • ALCOHOL AND NON-FATAL INJURY IN THE U.S. GENERAL POPULATION: A RISK FUNCTION ANALYSIS

    Cheryl J. Cherpitel;Tammy Tam;Lorraine Midanik;Raul Caetano

  • Perspectives on the validity of self-reported alcohol use.

    Lorraine T. Midanik

  • Maximum quantity consumed and alcohol-related problems: assessing the most alcohol drunk with two measures.

    Thomas K. Greenfield;Madhabika B. Nayak;Jason Bond;Yu Ye

  • Comparing usual quantity/frequency and graduated frequency scales to assess yearly alcohol consumption: results from the 1990 US National Alcohol Survey.

    Lorraine T. Midanik

  • Drinking-related problems in the United States: description and trends, 1984-1990.

    Lorraine T. Midanik;Walter B. Clark

  • Trends in social consequences and dependence symptoms in the United States: the National Alcohol Surveys, 1984-1995.

    Lorraine T. Midanik;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Drunken Comportment: a Social Explanation

    Lorraine T. Midanik

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas K. Greenfield
Thomas K. Greenfield Alcohol Research Group
Robin Room
Robin Room La Trobe University
Laurie A. Drabble
Laurie A. Drabble San Jose State University
Jason Bond
Jason Bond Alcohol Research Group
Jay P. Paul
Jay P. Paul University of California, San Francisco
Ron Stall
Ron Stall University of Pittsburgh
Raul Caetano
Raul Caetano Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation
Sandro Galea
Sandro Galea Washington University in St. Louis
Roberta Ferrence
Roberta Ferrence University of Toronto
Christine Godfrey
Christine Godfrey University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities online opens the door to a wide range of flexible, affordable, and accelerated degree options. Many students are seeking cheap msw programs online to pursue a Master of Social Work degree without significant financial burden. These programs are designed for those looking to make a positive impact in social services while balancing work or family commitments.

For individuals interested in applied behavior analysis, earning bcba certification online is a practical choice. This certification enables professionals to work with clients across educational and clinical settings, addressing behavioral and developmental challenges.

Accelerated pathways are also increasing in popularity. Students looking to quickly advance their credentials can consider 1 year msw programs or streamlined undergraduate options like accelerated psychology programs. These programs help career changers and working professionals gain new skills in less time, supporting faster entry or advancement in fields like counseling, social work, and psychology.

Ultimately, online degrees in these fields offer flexibility, affordability, and a diverse array of career opportunities for those passionate about making a difference.

Best Scientists Citing Lorraine T. Midanik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles