World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2826 2585 1364 1230 138 7789

Jason Bond publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jason Bond between 2002 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jason Bond published across 23 years, from 2002 to 2024, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2014. 2 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2014. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
2002 2024

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jason Bond: publications per year, 2002 to 2024
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 6
2004 3
2005 7
2006 9
2007 7
2008 7
2009 8
2010 14
2011 7
2012 14
2013 13
2014 18
2015 16
2016 3
2017 2
2018 2
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
Total 139
Download as CSV

Jason Bond publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason Bond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 138 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 138
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jason Bond D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason Bond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jason Bond is affiliated with the Alcohol Research Group in the United States. Their research activity spans the field of Medicine with a focus on subfields including Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Physiology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation

Jason Bond has contributed to the following recent academic papers:

  • High Intensity Drinking (HID) Assessed by Maximum Quantity Consumed Is an Important Pattern Measure Adding Predictive Value in Higher and Lower Income Societies for Modeling Alcohol-Related Problems, 2023, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Racial and Neighborhood Disparities in Legal Financial Obligations in Jefferson County, Alabama, 2024, published in the Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jason Bond include:

  • Thomas K. Greenfield
  • Camillia K. Lui
  • Won Kim Cook
  • Katherine J. Karriker-Jaffe
  • Libo Li

The key publication venues where Jason Bond's work appears are:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society

Best Publications

  • Religion and alcohol in the U.S. National Alcohol Survey: how important is religion for abstention and drinking?

    Laurence Michalak;Karen Trocki;Jason Bond

  • Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous

    Lee Ann Kaskutas;Jason Bond;Keith Humphreys

  • The persistent influence of social networks and alcoholics anonymous on abstinence.

    Jason Bond;Lee Ann Kaskutas;Constance Weisner

  • Are Lifetime Abstainers the Best Control Group in Alcohol Epidemiology? On the Stability and Validity of Reported Lifetime Abstention

    Jürgen T. Rehm;Hyacinth Irving;Yinjiao Ye;William C. Kerr

  • Elements that define recovery: the experiential perspective.

    Lee Ann Kaskutas;Thomasina J Borkman;Alexandre Laudet;Lois A Ritter

  • Ethnic disparities in clinical severity and services for alcohol problems: results from the National Alcohol Survey.

    Laura A. Schmidt;Yu Ye;Thomas K. Greenfield;Jason Bond

  • Multicentre study of acute alcohol use and non-fatal injuries: data from the WHO collaborative study on alcohol and injuries.

    Guilherme Borges;C. Cherpitel;Ricardo Orozco;Jason Bond

  • Age-period-cohort modelling of alcohol volume and heavy drinking days in the US National Alcohol Surveys: divergence in younger and older adult trends

    William C. Kerr;Thomas K. Greenfield;Jason Bond;Yinjiao Ye

  • Stress, social support and problem drinking among women in poverty.

    Nina Mulia;Laura Schmidt;Jason Bond;Laurie Jacobs

  • Age, period and cohort influences on beer, wine and spirits consumption trends in the US National Alcohol Surveys

    William C. Kerr;Thomas K. Greenfield;Jason Bond;Yu Ye

  • A cross‐national meta‐analysis of alcohol and injury: data from the Emergency Room Collaborative Alcohol Analysis Project (ERCAAP)

    Cheryl J. Cherpitel;Jason Bond;Yinjiao Ye;Guilherme Borges

  • Alcoholics anonymous careers : Patterns of AA involvement five years after treatment entry

    Lee Ann Kaskutas;Lyndsay Ammon;Kevin Delucchi;Robin Room

  • Alcohol consumption patterns and risk factors among childhood cancer survivors compared to siblings and general population peers.

    E. Anne Lown;Robert Goldsby;Ann C. Mertens;Thomas Greenfield

  • Maximum quantity consumed and alcohol-related problems: assessing the most alcohol drunk with two measures.

    Thomas K. Greenfield;Madhabika B. Nayak;Jason Bond;Yu Ye

  • Neighborhood disadvantage and adult alcohol outcomes: differential risk by race and gender.

    Katherine J. Karriker-Jaffe;Sarah E. Zemore;Nina Mulia;Rhonda Jones-Webb

  • Externalities from Alcohol Consumption in the 2005 US National Alcohol Survey: Implications for Policy

    Thomas K. Greenfield;Yinjiao Ye;William Kerr;Jason Bond

  • Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes.

    Douglas L. Polcin;Rachael A. Korcha;Jason Bond;Gantt Galloway

  • Acute alcohol use and the risk of non-fatal injury in sixteen countries.

    Guilherme Borges;Cheryl J. Cherpitel;Ricardo Orozco;Jason Bond

  • Multi-level analysis of alcohol-related injury among emergency department patients: a cross-national study

    Cheryl J. Cherpitel;Yinjiao Ye;Jason Bond;Jürgen T. Rehm

  • A randomized trial of a mental health consumer-managed alternative to civil commitment for acute psychiatric crisis.

    Thomas K. Greenfield;Beth C. Stoneking;Keith Humphreys;Evan Sundby

  • Multicentre Study of Acute Alcohol Use and Non-Fatal Injuries: Data from the WHO Collaborative Study on Alcohol and Injuries/ Etude Multicentrique De la Relation Entre Abus D'alcool et Traumatismes Non Mortels : Donnees Fournies Par Une Etude Collective Menee Par l'OMS Sur le Theme Alcools et traumatismes/Estudio Multicentrico Sobre Consumo Agudo De Alcohol Y Traumatismos No Mortales: Datos De Un Estudio

    Guilherme Borges;Cheryl Cherpitel;Ricardo Orozco;Jason Bond

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas K. Greenfield
Thomas K. Greenfield Alcohol Research Group
Guilherme Borges
Guilherme Borges Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría
Jürgen Rehm
Jürgen Rehm University of Toronto
Robin Room
Robin Room La Trobe University
Gantt P. Galloway
Gantt P. Galloway California Pacific Medical Center
Lee Ann Kaskutas
Lee Ann Kaskutas University of California, Berkeley
Constance Weisner
Constance Weisner Kaiser Permanente
Vladimir Poznyak
Vladimir Poznyak World Health Organization
Norman Giesbrecht
Norman Giesbrecht Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide range of meaningful career paths. For students seeking accessible and flexible education, numerous cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online offer a direct route to becoming licensed counselors. These programs are designed to keep tuition costs low while maintaining the accreditation necessary for professional practice.

Another rewarding option is to become a marriage and family therapist, which requires specialized training. There are several affordable and reputable marriage and family therapist degree programs available online, providing students with the tools to support couples and families in diverse communities.

Psychology remains a popular field for those interested in understanding human behavior. Many universities now offer a psychology degree online, allowing students to complete their education at their own pace while preparing for careers in counseling, research, or human resources.

For those passionate about social work, several online msw programs are accessible and relatively easy to enter. These degrees equip graduates to create change through advocacy, therapy, and community leadership. With numerous options, students can find a program that fits their goals and budget while making a real difference in society.

Best Scientists Citing Jason Bond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles