World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 85 1201 739 249 22676
Medicine 84 15266 7701 213 21944

Cheryl Koopman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cheryl Koopman between 1981 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cheryl Koopman published across 43 years, from 1981 to 2023, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2003. 2 of the 256 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2003. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 8 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 22 publications 2003: 24 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 8 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication
1981 2023

256 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cheryl Koopman: publications per year, 1981 to 2023
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 2
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 3
1991 7
1992 3
1993 1
1994 5
1995 9
1996 5
1997 1
1998 8
1999 5
2000 11
2001 15
2002 22
2003 24
2004 6
2005 8
2006 10
2007 17
2008 7
2009 12
2010 11
2011 8
2012 10
2013 13
2014 5
2015 8
2016 2
2017 1
2018 8
2019 1
2020 0
2021 1
2022 1
2023 1
Total 256
Download as CSV

Cheryl Koopman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cheryl Koopman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 249 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 249
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cheryl Koopman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cheryl Koopman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 85
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cheryl Koopman was affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their scholarly work primarily focused on the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with particular attention to public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and endocrine and autonomic systems.

The main topics addressed throughout their research included ethics in clinical research, health policy implementation science, mental health treatment and access, sleep and related disorders, circadian rhythm and melatonin, as well as stress responses and cortisol.

Koopman's recent published papers covered diverse aspects within these fields and topics. These included:

  • Improving Recruitment for Mental Health Research in Muslim American Women, 2021, Community Mental Health Journal
  • Assessment of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms of Endocrine and Immune Function Among Women With Advanced Breast Cancer, 2022, Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences
  • Factors Associated with Better SUD Services in VA PTSD Specialty Outpatient Clinics, 2023, PsycEXTRA Dataset

Frequent collaborators included Rania Awaad, Heba Abolaban, Sara Maklad, Rabeea Ahmad, and Bita Nouriani. Academic venues where Koopman's work was frequently published included the Community Mental Health Journal, Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, and PsycEXTRA Dataset.

Best Publications

  • Stanford presenteeism scale: health status and employee productivity.

    Cheryl Koopman;Kenneth R. Pelletier;James F. Murray;Claire E. Sharda

  • Predictors of posttraumatic stress symptoms among survivors of the Oakland/Berkeley, Calif., firestorm.

    Cheryl Koopman;Catherine Classen;David A. Spiegel

  • Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized clinical intervention trial.

    Catherine Classen;Lisa D. Butler;Cheryl Koopman;Elaine Miller

  • Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer.

    Andrew J. Winzelberg;Catherine Classen;Georg W. Alpers;Heidi Roberts

  • Reducing HIV sexual risk behaviors among runaway adolescents.

    Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus;Cheryl Koopman;Clara Haignere;Mark Davies

  • Psychometric properties of the Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire (SASRQ): A valid and reliable measure of acute stress

    Etzel Cardeña;Cheryl Koopman;Catherine Classen;Lynn C. Waelde

  • Coping styles associated with psychological adjustment to advanced breast cancer

    Catherine Classen;Cheryl Koopman;Karyn Angell;David Spiegel

  • Acute Stress Disorder as a Predictor of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms

    Catherine Classen;Cheryl Koopman;Robert Hales;David Spiegel

  • Social support and salivary cortisol in women with metastatic breast cancer.

    Julie M. Turner-Cobb;Sandra E. Sephton;Cheryl Koopman;Jane Blake-Mortimer

  • Hypnotizability and traumatic experience: A diathesis-stress model of dissociative symptomatology.

    L. D. Butler;R. E. F. Duran;P. Jasiukaitis;C. Koopman

  • Acute stress disorder among parents of infants in the neonatal intensive care nursery.

    Richard J. Shaw;Thomas Deblois;Linda Ikuta;Karni Ginzburg

  • Mindfulness and Rumination: Does Mindfulness Training Lead to Reductions in the Ruminative Thinking Associated With Depression?

    Mary Deyo;Kimberly A. Wilson;Jason Ong;Cheryl Koopman

  • Pain and depression in patients with cancer

    David Spiegel;Susan Sands;Cheryl Koopman

  • The relationship between acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder in the neonatal intensive care unit.

    Richard J. Shaw;Rebecca S. Bernard;Rebecca S. Bernard;Thomas DeBlois;Thomas DeBlois;Linda M. Ikuta;Linda M. Ikuta

  • Social support, life stress, pain and emotional adjustment to advanced breast cancer

    Cheryl Koopman;Kaye Hermanson;Susan Diamond;Karyn Angell

  • Effects of supportive‐expressive group therapy on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer

    David Spiegel;Lisa D. Butler;Janine Giese‐Davis;Cheryl Koopman

  • The effects of a mindfulness‐based stress reduction program on stress, mindfulness self‐efficacy, and positive states of mind

    Vickie Y. Chang;Oxana Palesh;Rebecca Caldwell;Nathan Glasgow

  • When disaster strikes, acute stress disorder may follow.

    Cheryl Koopman;Catherine C Classen;Etzel Cardeña;David Spiegel

  • Sexual abuse history and associated multiple risk behavior in adolescent runaways

    Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus;Karen A. Mahler;Cheryl Koopman;B A Kris Langabeer

  • Traumatic stress, life events, and emotional support in women with metastatic breast cancer: cancer-related traumatic stress symptoms associated with past and current stressors.

    Lisa D. Butler;Cheryl Koopman;Catherine Classen;David Spiegel

Frequent Co-Authors

David Spiegel
David Spiegel Stanford University
Cheryl Gore-Felton
Cheryl Gore-Felton Stanford University
Catherine C. Classen
Catherine C. Classen University of Toronto
Lisa D. Butler
Lisa D. Butler University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus
Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus University of California, Los Angeles
Janine Giese-Davis
Janine Giese-Davis University of Calgary
Helena C. Kraemer
Helena C. Kraemer Stanford University
Carl E. Thoresen
Carl E. Thoresen Stanford University
Joop T. V. M. de Jong
Joop T. V. M. de Jong University of Amsterdam
Hans Steiner
Hans Steiner Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to a variety of career pathways, especially for those interested in becoming a licensed therapist. Each state—and in some cases, individual cities—have different educational and licensure requirements. For example, the Aurora licensed therapist education requirements highlight the need for a regionally accredited graduate degree, alongside specific coursework and supervised clinical experience.

Similarly, the process to meet Austin licensed therapist education requirements involves obtaining a master’s degree, passing state exams, and completing post-graduate supervised hours. In California, those interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Bakersfield must also fulfill state-specific training modules and background checks.

For those on the East Coast, becoming a licensed therapist in Baltimore includes similar graduate degree and supervised practice elements, but may differ in required credits or examination formats. Researching your target state’s requirements before enrolling in any online program is essential, ensuring you choose a pathway that aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Cheryl Koopman

Recently Published Articles