World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 62 11041 10177 300 290 358 10414

Chris G. Carter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chris G. Carter between 1991 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chris G. Carter published across 31 years, from 1991 to 2021, averaging 11.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2010. 21 of the 356 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2010. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 38 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 13 publications
1991 2021

356 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chris G. Carter: publications per year, 1991 to 2021
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 6
1993 4
1994 4
1995 13
1996 3
1997 5
1998 7
1999 11
2000 8
2001 15
2002 11
2003 11
2004 14
2005 13
2006 18
2007 17
2008 17
2009 9
2010 38
2011 19
2012 15
2013 10
2014 8
2015 15
2016 11
2017 14
2018 5
2019 12
2020 8
2021 13
Total 356
Download as CSV

Chris G. Carter publications per year - data summary

  • Chris G. Carter, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from University of Tasmania, has 356 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1991 to 2021.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1991 and the most recent to 2021.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 38 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1991, with 2 publications.
  • The rate of publication averages 11.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.5 per year counting only the 31 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2017-2021) hold 52 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1991-2001: 78 publications (7.1 per year); 2002-2012: 182 publications (16.5 per year); 2013-2021: 96 publications (10.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Chris G. Carter publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris G. Carter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 357–366 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 358 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196 358
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Chris G. Carter publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 47–56 to 1,028+ publications.
  • Chris G. Carter, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from University of Tasmania, records 358 publications - the 86th percentile of the discipline.
  • 86% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Chris G. Carter, and about 14% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 197–206 publications range, and Chris G. Carter ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 127–136 publications, holding 980 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 287–296 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Chris G. Carter D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris G. Carter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130 62
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Chris G. Carter D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 65 ranges running from 40–41 to 167+ D-Index.
  • Chris G. Carter, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from University of Tasmania, records 62 D-Index - the 46th percentile of the discipline.
  • 46% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Chris G. Carter, and about 54% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 64–65 D-Index range, and Chris G. Carter ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 58–59 D-Index, holding 1,253 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 72–73 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Biochemistry
  • Aquaculture

Chris G. Carter focuses on Animal science, Aquaculture, Salmo, Biochemistry and Fish meal. His Animal science research incorporates themes from Jasus edwardsii, Decapoda, Aquatic animal and Fishery. His study in Fishery is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Food availability and Mariculture.

His Aquaculture research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Ecology and Fish oil. His research integrates issues of Morning and Food science in his study of Biochemistry. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Feed conversion ratio, Lupinus angustifolius, Weight gain and Plant protein.

His most cited work include:

  • Fish meal replacement by plant meals in extruded feeds for Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. (326 citations)
  • The effect of feeding hierarchy on individual variability in daily feeding of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) (288 citations)
  • Replacement of fish oil with sunflower oil in feeds for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): effect on growth performance, tissue fatty acid composition and disease resistance. (151 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Aquaculture, Fishery, Animal science, Ecology and Salmo. His Aquaculture study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Food science and Fish meal. His research in Food science intersects with topics in Biochemistry, Fish oil, Polyunsaturated fatty acid and Animal nutrition.

His work in Fishery tackles topics such as Southern bluefin tuna which are related to areas like Thunnus. Chris G. Carter focuses mostly in the field of Animal science, narrowing it down to topics relating to Excretion and, in certain cases, Urea. His Ecology study incorporates themes from Zoology and Protein turnover.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Aquaculture (54.31%)
  • Fishery (46.84%)
  • Animal science (25.29%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Aquaculture (54.31%)
  • Fishery (46.84%)
  • Spiny lobster (8.33%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Aquaculture, Fishery, Spiny lobster, Animal science and Juvenile. His Aquaculture study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Ecology, Food science, Fish meal, Salmo and Fish oil. Chris G. Carter has included themes like Meal, Tropics and Polyunsaturated fatty acid in his Fish meal study.

His Fish oil research incorporates elements of Biochemistry and Dietary lipid. His Fishery research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Agriculture, Climate change, Nutrient and Temperate climate. Many of his studies on Animal science apply to Seawater as well.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Response of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar to temperature and dissolved oxygen extremes established using animal-borne environmental sensors (40 citations)
  • Temperature dependent growth, feeding, nutritional condition and aerobic metabolism of juvenile spiny lobster, Sagmariasus verreauxi. (23 citations)
  • Liver proteome response of pre-harvest Atlantic salmon following exposure to elevated temperature (20 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Biochemistry
  • Internal medicine

Chris G. Carter mainly investigates Aquaculture, Salmo, Animal science, Polyunsaturated fatty acid and Anatomy. His Aquaculture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Ecology, Juvenile, Habitat, Fish meal and Feed conversion ratio. His Salmo research includes elements of Stocking, Deformity, Andrology, Hormone and Gene.

His Animal science research includes themes of Fishery, Fontinalis and Spiny lobster. The study incorporates disciplines such as Trout, Salvelinus and Nutrient in addition to Fishery. Chris G. Carter works mostly in the field of Polyunsaturated fatty acid, limiting it down to topics relating to Fish oil and, in certain cases, Dietary lipid, Biochemistry and Food science.

Best Publications

  • Fish meal replacement by plant meals in extruded feeds for Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.

    C.G Carter;R.C Hauler

  • The effect of feeding hierarchy on individual variability in daily feeding of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum)

    I. D. Mccarthy;C. G. Carter;D. F. Houlihan

  • Replacement of fish oil with sunflower oil in feeds for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): effect on growth performance, tissue fatty acid composition and disease resistance.

    Matthew P. Bransden;Chris G. Carter;Peter D. Nichols

  • n-3 Oil sources for use in aquaculture--alternatives to the unsustainable harvest of wild fish.

    Matthew R. Miller;Peter D. Nichols;Chris G. Carter

  • Effect of phytic acid and phytase on feed intake, growth, digestibility and trypsin activity in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar, L.)

    M. Sajjadi;C.G. Carter

  • Replacement of fish oil with thraustochytrid Schizochytrium sp. L oil in Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar L) diets.

    Matthew R. Miller;Peter D. Nichols;Chris G. Carter

  • Growth, physiological and immunological responses of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to different dietary inclusion levels of dehulled lupin (Lupinus angustifolius)

    M Farhangi;C G Carter

  • Dietary phytase supplementation and the utilisation of phosphorus by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fed a canola-meal-based diet

    M. Sajjadi;C.G. Carter

  • Growth and feed utilization efficiencies of seawater Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., fed a diet containing supplementary enzymes

    C. G. Carter;D. F. Houlihan;B. Buchanan;A. I. Mitchell

  • Correlation of plasma IGF-I concentrations and growth rate in aquacultured finfish: a tool for assessing the potential of new diets.

    Anthony R Dyer;Christopher G Barlow;Matthew P Bransden;Chris G Carter

  • Variation in individual food consumption rates of fish and its implications for the study of fish nutrition and physiology.

    Ian D. McCarthy;Dominic F. Houlihan;Chris G. Carter;Katerina Moutou

  • A comparison of the digestibility of a range of lupin and soybean protein products when fed to either Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) or rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

    Brett D Glencross;Chris G Carter;Neil Duijster;Neil Duijster;David R Evans

  • Individual Variation in Protein Turnover and Growth Efficiency in Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum)

    I. D. Mc Carthy;D. F. Houlihan;C. G. Carter

  • The effect of beta-glucan administration on macrophage respiratory burst activity and Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., challenged with amoebic gill disease--evidence of inherent resistance.

    A R Bridle;C G Carter;R N Morrison;B F Nowak

  • Effect of enzyme supplementation to dehulled lupin-based diets on growth, feed efficiency, nutrient digestibility and carcass composition of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum)

    Mehrdad Farhangi;Chris G Carter

  • Ammonia and urea excretion rates of juvenile Australian short-finned eel (Anguilla australis australis) as influenced by dietary protein level

    K. Engin;C.G. Carter

  • Potential of thraustochytrids to partially replace fish oil in Atlantic salmon feeds.

    C G Carter;M P Bransden;T E Lewis;P D Nichols

  • Optimal dietary protein level for juvenile southern rock lobster, Jasus edwardsii, at two lipid levels

    L.R Ward;C.G Carter;B.J Crear;D.M Smith

  • Food consumption, feeding behaviour, and growth of triploid and diploid Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., parr

    C. G. Carter;I. D. McCarthy;D. F. Houlihan;R. Johnstone

  • Protein Turnover in Animals

    DF Houlihan;CG Carter;ID McCarthy

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter D. Nichols
Peter D. Nichols Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Dominic F. Houlihan
Dominic F. Houlihan University of Aberdeen
Malcolm Jobling
Malcolm Jobling University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Barbara F. Nowak
Barbara F. Nowak University of Tasmania
Richard Wilson
Richard Wilson Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
Stewart Frusher
Stewart Frusher University of Tasmania
Surinder P. Singh
Surinder P. Singh Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Abigail Elizur
Abigail Elizur University of the Sunshine Coast
Alistair J. Hobday
Alistair J. Hobday Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Natalie A. Moltschaniwskyj
Natalie A. Moltschaniwskyj University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Chris G. Carter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles