World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
8507
World Ranking
5053
National Ranking
2773

Richard L. Marsh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Marsh sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard L. Marsh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Marsh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard L. Marsh was affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research primarily focused on medicine, with particular attention to cognitive neuroscience, ecology, biomedical engineering, and cancer research. Their academic contributions spanned various subfields, including ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics.

The researcher contributed to studies addressing physiological and biochemical adaptations, breast cancer treatment, bat biology and ecology, biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms, advanced radiotherapy techniques, muscle activation and electromyography, as well as amphibian and reptile biology.

Marsh's recent publications, covering work up to 2022, included:

  • "A proximal-distal difference in bat wing muscle thermal sensitivity parallels a difference in operating temperatures along the wing" (2021), published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "A biomechanical paradox in fish: swimming and suction feeding produce orthogonal strain gradients in the axial musculature" (2021), published in Scientific Reports
  • "Muscle preactivation and the limits of muscle power output during jumping in the Cuban tree frog Osteopilus septentrionalis" (2022), published in Journal of Experimental Biology
  • "Thermal Stability of Contractile Proteins in Bat Wing Muscles Explains Differences in Temperature Dependence of Whole-Muscle Shortening Velocity" (2022), published in Physiological and Biochemical Zoology
  • "A comparison of thermal sensitivities of wing muscle contractile properties from a temperate and tropical bat species" (2022), published in Journal of Experimental Biology

Their frequent collaborators included A. Moncion, Andrea D. Rummel, Sharon M. Swartz, M. Mietzel, and Maria C. Mejia de Grubb.

Marsh's work appeared most often in the International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and the Journal of Experimental Biology, with additional publications in Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, and Scientific Reports.

Best Publications

  • Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Martin L. Bink

  • Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks

  • How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity

    Richard L. Marsh;Joshua D. Landau;Jason L. Hicks

  • Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Gabriel I. Cook;Jeffrey S. Hansen

  • Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions☆

    Jason L. Hicks;Richard L. Marsh;Gabriel I. Cook

  • Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory.

    Unknown

  • Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized.

    John G. Seamon;Richard L. Marsh;Nathan Brody

  • The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task.

    Richard L. Marsh;Thomas B. Ward;Joshua D. Landau

  • Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation

    Richard L. Marsh;Joshua D. Landau;Jason L. Hicks

  • On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Gabriel I. Cook

  • An investigation of everyday prospective memory.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Joshua D. Landau

  • The activation of unrelated and canceled intentions.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Eric Shane Bryan

  • Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Gabriel I. Cook

  • The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory.

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks;Valerie Watson

  • Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes

    Richard L. Marsh;Jason L. Hicks

  • Cognitive Regularities in Creative Activity

    Martin L. Bink;Richard L. Marsh

  • Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring.

    Jason L. Hicks;Richard L. Marsh

  • The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory.

    Richard L. Marsh;Thomas W. Hancock;Jason L. Hicks

  • Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection

    Gene A. Brewer;Justin B. Knight;Richard L. Marsh;Nash Unsworth

  • Eliciting Cryptomnesia: Unconscious Plagiarism in a Puzzle Task

    Richard L. Marsh;Gordon H. Bower

  • The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories.

    Jason L. Hicks;Richard L. Marsh;Edward J. Russell

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason L. Hicks
Jason L. Hicks Louisiana State University
Gene A. Brewer
Gene A. Brewer Arizona State University
Zachary Estes
Zachary Estes Bocconi University
Brett A. Clementz
Brett A. Clementz University of Georgia
Nash Unsworth
Nash Unsworth University of Oregon
Nader Amir
Nader Amir San Diego State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA offers a variety of flexible online degree options to accommodate different career goals and schedules. For those seeking a fast-track route, a 1-year masters in psychology online can accelerate your entry into specialized roles without a long time commitment.

If your interests lie in behavior analysis, earning aba online degrees can prepare you for careers in clinical, educational, and healthcare settings, helping people improve their daily lives.

For those just starting out or exploring the field, the best 2-year psychology degree online programs offer foundational knowledge and an affordable entry point leading to further studies or entry-level opportunities.

Students seeking a comprehensive understanding of psychological principles can consider a bachelor degree psychology online, which opens doors to a broad range of professional and educational pathways.

Online study provides flexibility for working adults, parents, and international students, while still delivering rigorous coursework and valuable skill development for a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Richard L. Marsh

Recently Published Articles