D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 31 Citations 3,822 111 World Ranking 8500 National Ranking 4634
Neuroscience D-index 31 Citations 3,822 109 World Ranking 7052 National Ranking 2971

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Cognition
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Artificial intelligence

His scientific interests lie mostly in Cognitive psychology, Memoria, Cognition, Perception and Encoding. Neil W. Mulligan interconnects Recognition memory, Implicit memory and Explicit memory in the investigation of issues within Cognitive psychology. His study in Memoria is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Social psychology, Categorization and Communication.

His Cognition research includes themes of Stimulus and Visual feedback. His research in Perception focuses on subjects like Fluency, which are connected to Experimental psychology, Memory performance, Metamemory and Speech recognition. His studies in Encoding integrate themes in fields like Generation effect and Generative grammar.

His most cited work include:

  • The Role of Attention During Encoding in Implicit and Explicit Memory (170 citations)
  • Divided attention and indirect memory tests. (141 citations)
  • Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming (104 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Cognitive psychology, Recall, Cognition, Implicit memory and Encoding. He has included themes like Memoria, Explicit memory, Perception and Priming in his Cognitive psychology study. His research integrates issues of Social psychology and Set in his study of Recall.

Neil W. Mulligan has researched Cognition in several fields, including Word recognition, Categorization and Information processing. While the research belongs to areas of Implicit memory, he spends his time largely on the problem of Semantic memory, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Memory errors and Memory rehearsal. His Encoding study deals with Enactment effect intersecting with Phrase.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Cognitive psychology (75.70%)
  • Recall (39.25%)
  • Cognition (37.38%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Cognitive psychology (75.70%)
  • Testing effect (11.21%)
  • Encoding (29.91%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Cognitive psychology, Testing effect, Encoding, Recall and Free recall are his primary areas of study. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Metamemory, Arousal and Perception. His Perception research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Word recognition, Attentional control, Optimal distinctiveness theory and Task analysis.

His research on Testing effect also deals with topics like

  • Natural language processing together with Levels-of-processing effect, Recall test and Mnemonic,
  • Experimental psychology, Set and Generation effect most often made with reference to Research design. His Encoding research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Contrast, Distraction, Episodic memory, Divided attention and Repetition priming. His work deals with themes such as Implicit memory, Lexical decision task, Communication and Verbal material, which intersect with Contrast.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Not all identification tasks are born equal: testing the involvement of production processes in perceptual identification and lexical decision. (5 citations)
  • Distinctiveness and the attentional boost effect. (4 citations)
  • Assessing why the testing effect is moderated by experimental design. (1 citations)

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

The Role of Attention During Encoding in Implicit and Explicit Memory

Neil W. Mulligan.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition (1998)

292 Citations

Divided attention and indirect memory tests.

Neil W. Mulligan;Marilyn Hartman.
Memory & Cognition (1996)

201 Citations

Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework

Neil W. Mulligan;Elliot Hirshman.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition (1997)

185 Citations

Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming

Neil W. Mulligan.
Memory & Cognition (1997)

149 Citations

Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance

Miri Besken;Neil W. Mulligan.
Memory & Cognition (2013)

130 Citations

Memory for actions: Enactment and source memory

Susan L. Hornstein;Neil W. Mulligan.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2004)

124 Citations

The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information.

Neil W. Mulligan.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition (1999)

108 Citations

Self-Generation and Memory

Neil W. Mulligan;Jeffrey P. Lozito.
Psychology of Learning and Motivation (2004)

104 Citations

Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing.

Elliot Hirshman;Neil Mulligan.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition (1991)

101 Citations

Generation and hypermnesia.

Neil W. Mulligan.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition (2001)

101 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Neil W. Mulligan

Mark A. McDaniel

Mark A. McDaniel

Washington University in St. Louis

Publications: 13

David R. Shanks

David R. Shanks

University College London

Publications: 10

Colin MacLeod

Colin MacLeod

University of Western Australia

Publications: 10

John D. E. Gabrieli

John D. E. Gabrieli

MIT

Publications: 10

Suparna Rajaram

Suparna Rajaram

Stony Brook University

Publications: 10

Aaron S. Benjamin

Aaron S. Benjamin

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Publications: 9

Henry L. Roediger

Henry L. Roediger

Washington University in St. Louis

Publications: 9

Steven M. Smith

Steven M. Smith

Texas A&M University

Publications: 8

Edgar Erdfelder

Edgar Erdfelder

University of Mannheim

Publications: 8

John Dunlosky

John Dunlosky

Kent State University

Publications: 7

Joel L. Voss

Joel L. Voss

Northwestern University

Publications: 7

Mark L. Howe

Mark L. Howe

City, University of London

Publications: 7

Alan D. Castel

Alan D. Castel

University of California, Los Angeles

Publications: 7

Marinus N. Verbaten

Marinus N. Verbaten

Utrecht University

Publications: 6

Axel Buchner

Axel Buchner

Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

Publications: 6

Ken A. Paller

Ken A. Paller

Northwestern University

Publications: 6

Trending Scientists

Béatrice Rivière

Béatrice Rivière

Rice University

Jose I. Leon

Jose I. Leon

University of Seville

Khac Duc Do

Khac Duc Do

Curtin University

Wen-Chau Liu

Wen-Chau Liu

National Cheng Kung University

Ehud Keinan

Ehud Keinan

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

Robert M. Stephens

Robert M. Stephens

National Institutes of Health

Tony D. Williams

Tony D. Williams

Simon Fraser University

Nils Ryman

Nils Ryman

Stockholm University

Zhenbiao Yang

Zhenbiao Yang

University of California, Riverside

Jean-Jacques Soghomonian

Jean-Jacques Soghomonian

Boston University

Geneviève Albouy

Geneviève Albouy

KU Leuven

Tatsuya Mima

Tatsuya Mima

Ritsumeikan University

Chiara Castelli

Chiara Castelli

University of Milan

Charles N. Ellis

Charles N. Ellis

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Hossein Hosseinzadeh

Hossein Hosseinzadeh

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Ella Arensman

Ella Arensman

University College Cork

Something went wrong. Please try again later.