World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
7804
World Ranking
9388
National Ranking
104

Eli Vakil publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eli Vakil sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eli Vakil D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eli Vakil sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eli Vakil is affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental psychology. Their research spans a variety of specialized subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, epidemiology, psychiatry and mental health, and neurology.

Their work frequently addresses topics such as traumatic brain injury research, motor control and adaptation, memory processes and influences, genetic neurodegenerative diseases, memory and neural mechanisms, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Among the recent papers authored by or involving Vakil are the following:

  • "An eye tracking study of digital text reading: a comparison between poor and typical readers" (2020) published in Reading and Writing
  • "Oculomotor anticipation reveals a multitude of learning processes underlying the serial reaction time task" (2021) published in Scientific Reports
  • "The effectiveness of memory remediation strategies after traumatic brain injury: Systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021) published in Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
  • "How sequence learning unfolds: Insights from anticipatory eye movements" (2020) published in Cognition
  • "Selective Procedural Memory Impairment but Preserved Declarative Memory in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3" (2020) published in The Cerebellum

Vakil collaborates frequently with a number of co-authors, notably Simone Schwizer Ashkenazi, with whom they have published seven works. Other frequent collaborators include William Saban (five publications), Bar Lambez (three publications), Natalie Lugasi (three publications), and Anat Marmor (three publications).

Their research is regularly published in venues such as Psychology, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Psychological Research, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, and the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

Best Publications

  • Ageing, fitness and neurocognitive function.

    Arthur F. Kramer;Sowon Hahn;Neal J. Cohen;Marie T. Banich

  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10?20 years later: a comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning

    Dan Hoofien;Assaf Gilboa;Eli Vakil;Peter J. Donovick

  • The effect of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on different aspects of memory: a selective review.

    Eli Vakil

  • Rey auditory-verbal learning test: Structure analysis

    Eli Vakil;Haya Blachstein

  • Effect of Breakfast Timing on the Cognitive Functions of Elementary School Students

    Nachum Vaisman;Hillary Voet;Alla Akivis;Eli Vakil

  • Interpretation of Facial Expressions of Affect in Children with Learning Disabilities with Verbal or Nonverbal Deficits

    Lilly Dimitrovsky;Hedva Spector;Rachel Levy-Shiff;Eli Vakil

  • Rey AVLT: Developmental norms for adults and the sensitivity of different memory measures to age

    Eli Vakil;Haya Blachstein

  • Motor and non-motor sequence learning in patients with basal ganglia lesions: the case of serial reaction time (SRT)

    Eli Vakil;Shimon Kahan;Moshe Huberman;Alicia Osimani

  • Medical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral outcomes in school-age children conceived by In-Vitro Fertilization

    Rachel Levy-Shiff;Eli Vakil;Lilly Dimitrovsky;Miriam Abramovitz

  • Comparison of the predictive power of socio-economic variables, severity of injury and age on long-term outcome of traumatic brain injury: sample-specific variables versus factors as predictors.

    Dan Hoofien;Eli Vakil;Assaf Gilboa;Peter J. Donovick

  • Normative Data for Composite Scores for Children and Adults Derived from the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

    Eli Vakil;Yoram Greenstein;Haya Blachstein

  • Outcome of different treatment mixes in a multidimensional neuropsychological rehabilitation program.

    Jack Rattok;Barbara Ross;Yehuda Ben-Yishay;Ora Ezrachi

  • Predicting long-term outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI)

    Yuri Rassovsky;Yifat Levi;Eugenia Agranov;Michal Sela-Kaufman

  • Which verbal fluency measure is most useful in demonstrating executive deficits after traumatic brain injury

    Gitit Kavé;Eyal Heled;Eli Vakil;Eugenia Agranov

  • Unawareness of cognitive deficits and daily functioning among persons with traumatic brain injuries.

    Dan Hoofien;Asaf Gilboa;Eli Vakil;Ohr Barak

  • Declarative and procedural learning in Parkinson's disease patients having tremor or bradykinesia as the predominant symptom

    Eli Vakil;Sigal Herishanu-Naaman

  • Baseline Performance and Learning Rate of Procedural and Declarative Memory Tasks: Younger Versus Older Adults

    Eli Vakil;Dafna Agmon-Ashkenazi

  • Dissociation between the procedural learning of letter names and motor sequences in developmental dyslexia.

    Yafit Gabay;Rachel Schiff;Eli Vakil

  • Automatic temporal order judgment: the effect of intentionality of retrieval on closed-head-injured patients.

    Eli Vakil;Haya Blachstein;Dan Hoofien

  • Cognitive reserve components as expressed in traumatic brain injury.

    Yifat Levi;Yuri Rassovsky;Eugenia Agranov;Michal Sela-Kaufman

Frequent Co-Authors

David Tanne
David Tanne Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Talma Hendler
Talma Hendler Tel Aviv University
Nachum Soroker
Nachum Soroker Tel Aviv University
Joab Chapman
Joab Chapman Tel Aviv University
Gudrun Sartory
Gudrun Sartory University of Wuppertal
Hannie C. Comijs
Hannie C. Comijs VU University Medical Center
David Tzuriel
David Tzuriel Bar-Ilan University
Erik J. A. Scherder
Erik J. A. Scherder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Elaine K. Perry
Elaine K. Perry Newcastle University
Dorly J. H. Deeg
Dorly J. H. Deeg University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Psychology opens up a wide range of career pathways, especially in the field of counseling and mental health support. One highly impactful area is substance abuse counseling, a profession in high demand across many communities in the USA.

The requirements and certification processes for substance abuse counselors differ from city to city. For example, individuals interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Richmond must meet specific educational and practical training standards. Similarly, you can learn about the necessary steps in how to become a substance abuse counselor in Riverside, which outlines unique state and local criteria.

If you are seeking guidance on Sacramento substance abuse counselor certification requirements, reviewing state-mandated credentials is crucial. Those interested in working in Minnesota should explore the substance abuse counselor requirements in Saint Paul.

Exploring online psychology degrees can make these career paths more accessible, allowing flexibility as you meet local licensing requirements. Whether you aim to work in counseling, social services, or research, understanding regional requirements and pursuing accredited online programs can be your first step toward a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Eli Vakil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles