World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cemal Cem Tasan

Cemal Cem Tasan

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Materials Science 57 7837 7575 1945 1804 236 20036

Cemal Cem Tasan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cemal Cem Tasan between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cemal Cem Tasan published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2014. 16 of the 256 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2014. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 42 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications
2006 2025

256 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cemal Cem Tasan: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 2
2008 2
2009 4
2010 4
2011 2
2012 13
2013 14
2014 42
2015 34
2016 23
2017 23
2018 13
2019 12
2020 15
2021 19
2022 11
2023 6
2024 9
2025 7
Total 256
Download as CSV

Cemal Cem Tasan publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cemal Cem Tasan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 50–69 to 1,163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 891. Most scientists, 891, have 190–209 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 230–249 publications, is where this scientist sits. 50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50–69 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 236 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
50–69 28
70–89 152
90–109 356
110–129 487
130–149 723
150–169 835
170–189 850
190–209 891
210–229 862
230–249 766 236
250–269 726
270–289 665
290–309 593
310–329 537
330–349 477
350–369 440
370–389 356
390–409 321
410–429 256
430–449 246
450–469 216
470–489 212
490–509 174
510–529 194
530–549 162
550–569 131
570–589 111
590–609 103
610–629 99
630–649 77
650–669 92
670–689 56
690–709 53
710–729 53
730–749 38
750–769 52
770–789 43
790–809 38
810–829 34
830–849 25
850–869 18
870–889 20
890–909 24
910–929 27
930–949 20
950–969 17
970–989 10
990–1,009 16
1,010–1,029 13
1,030–1,049 12
1,050–1,069 9
1,070–1,089 8
1,090–1,109 7
1,110–1,129 9
1,130–1,149 2
1,150–1,162 5
1,163+ 100
Download as CSV

Cemal Cem Tasan D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cemal Cem Tasan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 165+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 667. Most scientists, 667, have 52–53 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 211
42–43 450
44–45 612
46–47 612
48–49 598
50–51 657
52–53 667
54–55 621
56–57 597 57
58–59 610
60–61 587
62–63 606
64–65 533
66–67 490
68–69 469
70–71 378
72–73 421
74–75 359
76–77 323
78–79 299
80–81 230
82–83 210
84–85 195
86–87 203
88–89 175
90–91 175
92–93 142
94–95 121
96–97 117
98–99 107
100–101 88
102–103 85
104–105 68
106–107 62
108–109 57
110–111 45
112–113 49
114–115 50
116–117 34
118–119 38
120–121 37
122–123 29
124–125 28
126–127 24
128–129 33
130–131 28
132–133 21
134–135 20
136–137 23
138–139 17
140–141 12
142–143 17
144–145 21
146–147 13
148–149 11
150–151 14
152–153 13
154–155 9
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 4
162–163 4
164 3
165+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cemal Cem Tasan is affiliated with MIT in the United States and specializes in engineering and materials science. Their research primarily focuses on materials chemistry, mechanical engineering, and metals and alloys, with notable contributions in subfields such as mechanics of materials and biomedical engineering.

Their work frequently addresses topics including:

  • Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
  • Microstructure and mechanical properties of steels
  • Microstructure and mechanical properties
  • High entropy alloys studies
  • Nuclear materials and properties
  • Titanium alloys microstructure and properties
  • Metal and thin film mechanics

Cemal Cem Tasan has published extensively in a variety of scientific journals. The most common venues for their work include:

  • Acta Materialia
  • Scripta Materialia
  • International Journal of Plasticity
  • Journal of Materials Processing Technology
  • Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A

Notable recent papers by the researcher include:

  • Sustainability through alloy design: Challenges and opportunities (2020) published in Progress in Materials Science
  • Damage in metal forming (2020) published in CIRP Annals
  • Carbon redistribution in quenched and tempered lath martensite (2020) published in Acta Materialia
  • Slip-twinning interdependent activation across phase boundaries: An in-situ investigation of a Ti-Al-V-Fe (α+β) alloy (2020) published in Acta Materialia
  • In-situ investigation of plasticity in a Ti-Al-V-Fe (α+β) alloy: Slip mechanisms, strain localization, and partitioning (2021) published in International Journal of Plasticity

The researcher collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Shaolou Wei
  • Jinwoo Kim
  • Hyun Seok Oh
  • Jiyun Kang
  • Kyung-Shik Kim

Best Publications

  • Metastable high-entropy dual-phase alloys overcome the strength–ductility trade-off

    Zhiming Li;Konda Gokuldoss Pradeep;Yun Deng;Dierk Raabe

  • Design of a twinning-induced plasticity high entropy alloy

    Yun Deng;Yun Deng;Cemal Cem Tasan;Konda Gokuldoss Pradeep;Konda Gokuldoss Pradeep;Hauke Springer

  • Natural-mixing guided design of refractory high-entropy alloys with as-cast tensile ductility

    Shaolou Wei;Sang Jun Kim;Jiyun Kang;Yong Zhang

  • A TRIP-assisted dual-phase high-entropy alloy: Grain size and phase fraction effects on deformation behavior

    Zhiming Li;Cemal Cem Tasan;Konda Gokuldoss Pradeep;Konda Gokuldoss Pradeep;Dierk Raabe

  • A novel, single phase, non-equiatomic FeMnNiCoCr high-entropy alloy with exceptional phase stability and tensile ductility

    Mengji Yao;Konda Gokuldoss Pradeep;Cemal Cem Tasan;Dierk Raabe

  • An Overview of Dual-Phase Steels: Advances in Microstructure-Oriented Processing and Micromechanically Guided Design

    Cemal Cem Tasan;Martin Diehl;Dingshun Yan;Marion Bechtold

  • Strategies for improving the sustainability of structural metals

    Dierk Raabe;Cemal Cem Tasan;Elsa A. Olivetti

  • Strain localization and damage in dual phase steels investigated by coupled in-situ deformation experiments and crystal plasticity simulations

    Cemal Cem Tasan;Johan P.M. Hoefnagels;Martin Diehl;Dingshun Yan

  • Interstitial atoms enable joint twinning and transformation induced plasticity in strong and ductile high-entropy alloys.

    Zhiming Li;Cemal Cem Tasan;Hauke Springer;Baptiste Gault

  • Hydrogen-assisted decohesion and localized plasticity in dual-phase steel

    Motomichi Koyama;Motomichi Koyama;Cemal Cem Tasan;Eiji Akiyama;Kaneaki Tsuzaki;Kaneaki Tsuzaki

  • Strain-programmable fiber-based artificial muscle.

    Mehmet Kanik;Sirma Orguc;Georgios Varnavides;Georgios Varnavides;Jinwoo Kim

  • Bone-like crack resistance in hierarchical metastable nanolaminate steels

    Motomichi Koyama;Zhao Zhang;Meimei Wang;Meimei Wang;Dirk Ponge

  • Integrated experimental-simulation analysis of stress and strain partitioning in multiphase alloys

    Cemal Cem Tasan;Martin Diehl;Dingshun Yan;Claudio Zambaldi

  • Smaller is less stable: Size effects on twinning vs. transformation of reverted austenite in TRIP-maraging steels

    Meimei Wang;Cemal Cem Tasan;Dirk Ponge;Aleksander Kostka

  • Nanolaminate Transformation-Induced Plasticity-Twinning-Induced Plasticity steel with Dynamic Strain Partitioning and Enhanced damage Resistance

    Meimei Wang;Cemal Cem Tasan;Dirk Ponge;Ann Christin Dippel

  • On the mechanism of {332} twinning in metastable β titanium alloys

    Minjie Lai;Cemal Cem Tasan;Dierk Raabe

  • Multiple mechanisms of lath martensite plasticity

    Lutz Morsdorf;Olivier Jeannin;David Barbier;Masatoshi Mitsuhara

  • 3D structural and atomic-scale analysis of lath martensite: Effect of the transformation sequence

    Lutz Morsdorf;Cemal Cem Tasan;Dirk Ponge;Dierk Raabe

  • Engineering atomic-level complexity in high-entropy and complex concentrated alloys.

    Hyun Seok Oh;Sang Jun Kim;Khorgolkhuu Odbadrakh;Khorgolkhuu Odbadrakh;Wook Ha Ryu

  • High resolution in situ mapping of microstrain and microstructure evolution reveals damage resistance criteria in dual phase steels

    Dingshun Yan;Cemal Cem Tasan;Dierk Raabe

  • Phase stability of non-equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloys

    Duancheng Ma;Mengji Yao;Konda Gokuldoss Pradeep;Konda Gokuldoss Pradeep;Cemal Cem Tasan

Frequent Co-Authors

Dierk Raabe
Dierk Raabe Max Planck Institute for Iron Research
Franz Roters
Franz Roters Max Planck Institute for Iron Research
Dirk Ponge
Dirk Ponge Max Planck Society
Mgd Marc Geers
Mgd Marc Geers Eindhoven University of Technology
Kaneaki Tsuzaki
Kaneaki Tsuzaki National Institute for Materials Science
Zhiming Li
Zhiming Li Central South University
Baptiste Gault
Baptiste Gault Max Planck Institute for Iron Research
Jörg Neugebauer
Jörg Neugebauer Max Planck Institute for Iron Research
Eiji Akiyama
Eiji Akiyama Tohoku University
Stefan Zaefferer
Stefan Zaefferer Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Cemal Cem Tasan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles