World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
64
Citations
32620
World Ranking
2272
National Ranking
915

Michael T. Coe publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Coe sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Michael T. Coe D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Coe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael T. Coe is affiliated with the Woods Hole Research Center in the United States. Their research contributes extensively to the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on various subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering, and Water Science and Technology.

The main topics covered in Coe's work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Environmental and Biological Studies, and Flood Risk Assessment and Management.

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Coe are:

  • The Unseen Effects of Deforestation: Biophysical Effects on Climate, 2022, published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • The Gathering Firestorm in Southern Amazonia, 2020, published in Science Advances
  • Amazon Wildfires: Scenes from a Foreseeable Disaster, 2020, published in Flora
  • Climatic Limit for Agriculture in Brazil, 2021, published in Nature Climate Change
  • Cerrado Deforestation Threatens Regional Climate and Water Availability for Agriculture and Ecosystems, 2022, published in Global Change Biology

Coe frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Paulo Brando, Márcia N. Macedo, Divino Vicente Silvério, Andrea Castanho, and Ludmila Rattis. The affiliations reflect ongoing research partnerships across various studies.

The scientist has published multiple papers in notable venues, with the most frequent being Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, Nature Climate Change, Environmental Research Letters, Remote Sensing, and Science Advances.

Best Publications

  • Global Consequences of Land Use

    Jonathan A. Foley;Ruth DeFries;Gregory P. Asner;Carol Barford

  • Cracking Brazil's Forest Code

    Britaldo Soares-Filho;Raoni Rajão;Marcia Macedo;Marcia Macedo;Arnaldo Carneiro

  • Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: Water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure

    Christopher J. Kucharik;Jonathan A. Foley;Christine Delire;Veronica A. Fisher

  • Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin

    Jonathan A. Foley;Gregory P. Asner;Marcos Heil Costa;Michael T. Coe

  • Abrupt increases in Amazonian tree mortality due to drought-fire interactions.

    Paulo Monteiro Brando;Paulo Monteiro Brando;Jennifer K. Balch;Daniel C. Nepstad;Douglas C. Morton

  • Impact of vegetation and preferential source areas on global dust aerosol: Results from a model study

    Ina Tegen;Sandy P. Harrison;Karen Kohfeld;I. Colin Prentice

  • Feedbacks between climate and boreal forests during the Holocene epoch

    Jonathan A. Foley;John E. Kutzbach;Michael T. Coe;Samuel Levis

  • The vulnerability of Amazon freshwater ecosystems

    Leandro Castello;David G. McGrath;Laura L. Hess;Michael T. Coe

  • Human and natural impacts on the water resources of the Lake Chad basin

    Michael T. Coe;Jonathan A. Foley

  • Land‐Use Change Affects Water Recycling in Brazil's Last Agricultural Frontier

    Stephanie A. Spera;Gillian L. Galford;Michael T. Coe;Marcia N. Macedo

  • The hydrology of the humid tropics

    Ellen Wohl;Ana Barros;Nathaniel Brunsell;Nick A. Chappell

  • Fire‐induced tree mortality in a neotropical forest: the roles of bark traits, tree size, wood density and fire behavior

    Paulo M. Brando;Paulo M. Brando;Daniel C. Nepstad;Jennifer K. Balch;Jennifer K. Balch;Benjamin Bolker

  • Regime Shifts in the Sahara and Sahel: Interactions between Ecological and Climatic Systems in Northern Africa

    Jonathan A. Foley;Michael T. Coe;Marten Scheffer;Guiling Wang

  • The Unseen Effects of Deforestation: Biophysical Effects on Climate

    Unknown

  • Modeling the hydrological impact of land-use change in West Africa

    K.Y. Li;M.T. Coe;N. Ramankutty;R. De Jong

  • Dependence of hydropower energy generation on forests in the Amazon Basin at local and regional scales.

    Claudia M. Stickler;Michael T. Coe;Marcos H. Costa;Daniel C. Nepstad

  • The potential ecological costs and cobenefits of REDD: a critical review and case study from the Amazon region

    Claudia M. Stickler;Claudia M. Stickler;Daniel C. Nepstad;Michael T. Coe;David G. McGRATH

  • The effects of deforestation and climate variability on the streamflow of the Araguaia River, Brazil

    M. T. Coe;Edgardo Manuel Latrubesse;M. E. Ferreira;M. L. Amsler

  • El Niño–Southern oscillation and the climate, ecosystems and rivers of Amazonia

    Jonathan A. Foley;Aurélie Botta;Michael T. Coe;Marcos Heil Costa

  • Effects of land cover change on evapotranspiration and streamflow of small catchments in the Upper Xingu River Basin, Central Brazil

    Lívia Cristina Pinto Dias;Márcia N. Macedo;Marcos Heil Costa;Michael T. Coe

  • Deforestation and climate feedbacks threaten the ecological integrity of south–southeastern Amazonia

    Michael T. Coe;Toby R. Marthews;Marcos Heil Costa;David R. Galbraith

  • Simulating the surface waters of the Amazon River basin: impacts of new river geomorphic and flow parameterizations

    Michael T. Coe;Marcos H. Costa;Erica A. Howard

  • Calculation of river discharge and prediction of lake height from satellite radar altimetry: Example for the Lake Chad basin

    Michael T. Coe;Charon M. Birkett

Frequent Co-Authors

Paulo M. Brando
Paulo M. Brando University of California, Irvine
Marcos Heil Costa
Marcos Heil Costa Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Britaldo Soares-Filho
Britaldo Soares-Filho Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Jonathan A. Foley
Jonathan A. Foley University of Minnesota
Eric A. Davidson
Eric A. Davidson University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Jennifer K. Balch
Jennifer K. Balch University of Colorado Boulder
Christopher Neill
Christopher Neill Woods Hole Research Center
Ke Zhang
Ke Zhang Hohai University
Navin Ramankutty
Navin Ramankutty University of British Columbia
Ruth S. DeFries
Ruth S. DeFries Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees that can enhance your career prospects. For those new to higher education or seeking a smooth transition, considering one of the easiest bachelor degree to get might be a strategic starting point. These programs balance workload with achievable learning outcomes, providing a foundation for specialized studies.

For individuals interested in earth sciences, pursuing a geologist degree online offers flexible options to study the physical aspects of the earth, vital for environmental problem-solving. This complements Environmental Sciences by deepening understanding of geological processes that impact ecosystems.

Another promising pathway is obtaining a gis degree programs qualification. GIS skills are increasingly important for environmental mapping and data analysis, empowering professionals to make data-driven decisions in conservation and resource management.

For those aiming to lead in public sector or nonprofit environmental initiatives, completing one of the 1 year mpa programs offers accelerated training in public administration and policy-making, essential for driving impactful environmental change.

Best Scientists Citing Michael T. Coe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles