World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
63
Citations
12682
World Ranking
2506
National Ranking
1006

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
62
Citations
12296
World Ranking
1107
National Ranking
300

Thomas M. Hinckley publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Hinckley sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 134 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Thomas M. Hinckley D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Hinckley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas M. Hinckley is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within the agricultural and biological sciences as well as environmental science. Specifically, their work addresses subfields such as global and planetary change, plant science, insect science, and nature and landscape conservation.

The scientist's research topics focus on areas related to forest ecology and biodiversity studies, fire effects on ecosystems, forest ecology and management, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, plant responses to water stress, and plant stress responses and tolerance.

Among their recent scholarly contributions is the paper titled Jan Čermák's lifetime contribution to tree water relations, published in 2022 in the journal Tree Physiology. This reflects their involvement in the study of plant water relations, an important aspect of plant physiological ecology.

Thomas M. Hinckley has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • E. Ashley Steel
  • W. H. G. Richards
  • David V. D'Amore
  • Stevan Harrell
  • Amanda H. Schmidt

Their work has appeared most often in the publication venue Tree Physiology, which aligns with their focus on plant science and ecological research.

Best Publications

  • THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF BRANCH AUTONOMY

    D. G. Sprugel;T. M. Hinckley;W. Schaap

  • Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation

    R. F. Stettler;H. D. Bradshaw;P. E. Heilman;T. M. Hinckley

  • Temporal and Spatial Variations in the Water Status of Forest Trees

    T. M. Hinckley;J. P. Lassoie;S. W. Running

  • Reliance on stored water increases with tree size in three species in the Pacific Northwest.

    N G Phillips;M G Ryan;M G Ryan;B J Bond;N G McDowell

  • Tree water storage and its diurnal dynamics related to sap flow and changes in stem volume in old-growth Douglas-fir trees

    Jan Čermák;Jiří Kučera;William L. Bauerle;Nathan Phillips

  • The relationship between tree height and leaf area: sapwood area ratio.

    N. Mcdowell;H. Barnard;B. J. Bond;T. Hinckley

  • Spectral and Structural Measures of Northwest Forest Vegetation at Leaf to Landscape Scales

    Dar A. Roberts;Susan L. Ustin;Segun Ogunjemiyo;Jonathan Greenberg

  • A Comparison of Pressure-Volume Curve Data Analysis Techniques

    P. J. Schulte;T. M. Hinckley

  • Water relations of drought hardy shrubs: osmotic potential and stomatal reactivity

    T. M. Hinckley;F. Duhme;A. R. Hinckley;H. Richter

  • Influence of temperature and water potential on root growth of white oak

    Robert O. Teskey;Thomas M. Hinckley

  • Water flux in a hybrid poplar stand.

    T. M. Hinckley;J. R. Brooks;J. Čermák;R. Ceulemans

  • Periodic root and shoot growth in oak.

    P. B. Reich;R. O. Teskey;P. S. Johnson;T. M. Hinckley

  • The effects of drought on water relations and stem shrinkage of Quercus alba

    Thomas M. Hinckley;David N. Bruckerhoff

  • Influence of pre-dawn water potential and soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance on maximum daily leaf diffusive conductance in two oak species

    P. B. Reich;T. M. Hinckley

  • Boundary layer conductance, leaf temperature and transpiration of Abies amabilis branches.

    Timothy A. Martin;Thomas M. Hinckley;Frederick C. Meinzer;Douglas G. Sprugel

  • Influence of soil water on the physiological and morphological components of plant water balance in Populus trichocarpa, Populus deltoides and their F1 hybrids

    J. H. Braatne;T. M. Hinckley;R. F. Stettler

  • Crown conductance and tree and stand transpiration in a second growth **Abies amabilis** forest

    T A Martin;K J Brown;J Cermák;R Ceulemans

  • CHAPTER 3 – TEMPERATE HARDWOOD FORESTS

    Unknown

  • Leaf Conductance and Photosynthesis in Four Species of the Oak-Hickory Forest Type

    T. M. Hinckley;R. G. Aslin;R. R. Aubuchon;C. L. Metcalf

  • Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short rotation. I. Clonal comparisons of 4-year growth and phenology

    R. Ceulemans;G. Scarascia-Mugnozza;B. M. Wiard;J. H. Braatne

  • Shoot structure, leaf area index and productivity of evergreen conifer stands

    J. W. Leverenz;T. M. Hinckley

  • Structural and functional responses to environmental stresses: water shortage.

    K. H. Kreeb;H. Richter;T. M. Hinckley

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert O. Teskey
Robert O. Teskey University of Georgia
Reinhart Ceulemans
Reinhart Ceulemans University of Antwerp
Frederick C. Meinzer
Frederick C. Meinzer Oregon State University
Nathan Phillips
Nathan Phillips Boston University
Barbara J. Bond
Barbara J. Bond Oregon State University
Timothy A. Martin
Timothy A. Martin University of Florida
Dar A. Roberts
Dar A. Roberts University of California, Santa Barbara
Jan Cermak
Jan Cermak Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Michael G. Ryan
Michael G. Ryan Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Hinckley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles