World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
65
Citations
14245
World Ranking
2218
National Ranking
149

Jan Cermak publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Cermak sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 246 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jan Cermak D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Cermak sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Jan Cermak is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany and has contributed to research across multiple interdisciplinary fields. Their work spans the domains of Arts and Humanities, Health Professions, and Environmental Science, reflecting a diverse scholarly interest.

Their research subfields include Language and Linguistics, General Health Professions, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. The main topics of their studies cover a wide range of areas such as Syntax, Semantics, and Linguistic Variation; Lexicography and Language Studies; Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity; Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues; Health, Medicine and Society; Natural Language Processing Techniques; as well as Language, Metaphor, and Cognition.

Jan Cermak's recent published papers include:

  • Transpiration of a mixed forest stand: field measurements and simulation using SVAT models (2024, Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive)
  • Subject-related - ly adverbs: The role of stativity in English adverbial formation. A synchronic and diachronic perspective (2023, Studia Neophilologica)
  • Seasonal Photosynthetic Activity in the Crown Compartments of European Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) (2024, Forests)

The research venues in which Jan Cermak frequently publishes include:

  • Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
  • Studia Neophilologica
  • Forests

Jan Cermak has collaborated with several coauthors involved in related fields. Frequent collaborators include Alexander Olchev, Nadezhda Nadezhdina, Fedör Tatarinov, A Tishenko, and Andreas Ibrom. This network indicates an engagement with scholars across environmental sciences and linguistics.

The interdisciplinary nature of Jan Cermak's work is evident in the breadth of topics addressed, bringing together elements of language studies and environmental research alongside health sciences. Their academic contributions provide insight into complex issues such as linguistic variation, cognitive processing of language, and ecological phenomena within forest environments.

Best Publications

  • Challenges in Combining Projections from Multiple Climate Models

    Reto Knutti;Reinhard Furrer;Claudia Tebaldi;Jan Cermak

  • Fog Research: A Review of Past Achievements and Future Perspectives

    I. Gultepe;R. Tardif;S. C. Michaelides;J. Cermak

  • Sap flow measurements with some thermodynamic methods, flow integration within trees and scaling up from sample trees to entire forest stands

    J. Čermák;J. Kučera;N. Nadezhdina

  • Canopy transpiration and water fluxes in the xylem of the trunk of Larix and Picea trees - a comparison of xylem flow, porometer and cuvette measurements

    E. D. Schulze;J. Čermák;M. Matyssek;M. Penka

  • Reliance on stored water increases with tree size in three species in the Pacific Northwest.

    N G Phillips;M G Ryan;M G Ryan;B J Bond;N G McDowell

  • Tree water storage and its diurnal dynamics related to sap flow and changes in stem volume in old-growth Douglas-fir trees

    Jan Čermák;Jiří Kučera;William L. Bauerle;Nathan Phillips

  • Sapflow measurements in forest stands: methods and uncertainties

    Barbara Köstner;André Granier;Jan Cermák

  • Mapping tree root systems with ground-penetrating radar

    Jiri Hruska;Jan Cermák;Svatopluk Sustek

  • Radial patterns of sap flow in woody stems of dominant and understory species: scaling errors associated with positioning of sensors

    Nadezhda Nadezhdina;Jan Cermák;Reinhart Ceulemans

  • Sapwood as the scaling parameter - defining according to xylem water content or radial pattern of sap flow?

    Jan Cermak;Nadezhda Nadezhdina

  • Water flux in a hybrid poplar stand.

    T. M. Hinckley;J. R. Brooks;J. Čermák;R. Ceulemans

  • Root functioning, tree water use and hydraulic redistribution in Quercus suber trees: A modeling approach based on root sap flow

    Teresa S. David;Clara A. Pinto;Nadezhda Nadezhdina;Cathy Kurz-Besson

  • Radial velocity profiles of water flow in trunks of Norway spruce and oak and the response of spruce to severing.

    Jan Čermák;Emil Cienciala;Jiří Kučera;Jan-Erik Hällgren

  • A novel approach to fog/low stratus detection using Meteosat 8 data

    Jan Cermak;Jörg Bendix

  • Trees never rest: the multiple facets of hydraulic redistribution

    Nadezhda Nadezhdina;Teresa S. David;Jorge S. David;Maria Isabel Ferreira

  • Crown conductance and tree and stand transpiration in a second growth **Abies amabilis** forest

    T A Martin;K J Brown;J Cermák;R Ceulemans

  • Instrumental methods for studies of structure and function of root systems of large trees

    Nadezhda Nadezhdina;Jan Cermak

  • Individual variation of sap-flow rate in large pine and spruce trees and stand transpiration: a pilot study at the central NOPEX site

    J. Čermák;E. Cienciala;J. Kučera;A. Lindroth

  • Above- and belowground phytomass and carbon storage in a Belgian Scots pine stand

    Ivan A. Janssens;David A. Sampson;Jan Cermak;Linda Meiresonne

  • Sap flow rate and transpiration dynamics in the full-grown oak (Quercus robus L.) in floodplain forest exposed to seasonal floods as related to potential evapotranspiration and tree dimensions

    J. Čermák;J. Úlehla;J. Kučera;M. Penka

  • Xylem water flow in a crack willow tree (Salix fragilis L.) in relation to diurnal changes of environment.

    Jan Čermák;Jan Jeník;Jiří Kučera;Vladimír Žídek

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörg Bendix
Jörg Bendix Philipp University of Marburg
Reinhart Ceulemans
Reinhart Ceulemans University of Antwerp
Reto Knutti
Reto Knutti ETH Zurich
Ivan A. Janssens
Ivan A. Janssens University of Antwerp
Thomas M. Hinckley
Thomas M. Hinckley University of Washington
Kathy Steppe
Kathy Steppe Ghent University
Norbert Kalthoff
Norbert Kalthoff Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Emil Cienciala
Emil Cienciala Czech Academy of Sciences
Antonio Raschi
Antonio Raschi National Research Council (CNR)
Roberto Tognetti
Roberto Tognetti University of Molise

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals pursue advanced education to enhance their expertise and leadership skills. For example, educators and administrators might look into online EdD no dissertation programs, allowing them to earn a terminal degree without the traditional dissertation requirement, saving time while gaining advanced knowledge.

Students aiming to progress from a master's in education to a doctorate will find the best online EdS to EdD programs helpful. These pathways often support careers that intersect education policy and environmental advocacy.

For those interested in social aspects of environmental work, such as community health or social justice, affordable options like DSW online programs provide a flexible route to advanced social work qualifications, enabling impactful careers in environmental social services or policy.

Additionally, students exploring interdisciplinary approaches might consider an accredited affordable online general studies degree. This degree offers broad learning opportunities, ideal for those seeking to blend environmental science with other fields like policy, business, or communication.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Cermak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles