World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Franck Brignolas

Franck Brignolas

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 34 5447 5104 228 224 61 3991

Franck Brignolas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Franck Brignolas between 1995 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Franck Brignolas published across 29 years, from 1995 to 2023, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2015. 1 of the 62 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2015. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1995 2023

62 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Franck Brignolas: publications per year, 1995 to 2023
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 3
2006 3
2007 0
2008 3
2009 4
2010 4
2011 6
2012 4
2013 7
2014 0
2015 9
2016 2
2017 0
2018 3
2019 0
2020 0
2021 3
2022 0
2023 1
Total 62
Download as CSV

Franck Brignolas publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franck Brignolas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–65 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 61 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107 61
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Franck Brignolas D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franck Brignolas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288 34
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

Franck Brignolas mainly investigates Botany, Horticulture, Specific leaf area, Stomatal conductance and Xylem. His work in the fields of Woody plant, Salicaceae and Water-use efficiency overlaps with other areas such as Water transport. His research integrates issues of Fagus sylvatica and Resistance in his study of Horticulture.

His Specific leaf area study incorporates themes from Irrigation and Cutting. As a part of the same scientific family, Franck Brignolas mostly works in the field of Stomatal conductance, focusing on Agronomy and, on occasion, Soil water, Chlorophyll, Sugar, Genotype and Genetic diversity. His Xylem research includes themes of Shoot, Beech, Physiological condition and Hybrid poplar.

His most cited work include:

  • Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoides×Populus nigra (327 citations)
  • Water stress-induced xylem hydraulic failure is a causal factor of tree mortality in beech and poplar (121 citations)
  • Water stress-induced xylem hydraulic failure is a causal factor of tree mortality in beech and poplar (121 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Franck Brignolas focuses on Botany, Horticulture, Water-use efficiency, Agronomy and Genotype. Genetic variability is closely connected to Genetic variation in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Botany. The various areas that Franck Brignolas examines in his Horticulture study include Poplar trees, Dry matter, Cellulose and Transpiration.

His study in Water-use efficiency is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Coppicing, Biomass, Hybrid, Specific leaf area and Drought tolerance. His studies in Agronomy integrate themes in fields like Short rotation coppice and Soil water. Franck Brignolas interconnects Photosynthesis and Basal area in the investigation of issues within Genotype.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (84.62%)
  • Horticulture (37.18%)
  • Water-use efficiency (41.03%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2020)?

  • Phenotypic plasticity (6.41%)
  • Agronomy (34.62%)
  • Gene (24.36%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Phenotypic plasticity, Agronomy, Gene, Cell biology and Botany. Franck Brignolas combines subjects such as Epigenetics and Meristem with his study of Phenotypic plasticity. His research in Agronomy intersects with topics in Short rotation coppice, Bioenergy, Soil water and Competition.

Franck Brignolas has researched Cell biology in several fields, including Histidine kinase and Regulation of gene expression. His Botany study frequently links to adjacent areas such as Horticulture. His Horticulture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Hydraulic conductivity, Vapour Pressure Deficit, Phenology and Water-use efficiency.

Between 2014 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Changes in the epigenome and transcriptome of the poplar shoot apical meristem in response to water availability affect preferentially hormone pathways. (29 citations)
  • Vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation in poplars: synthesis and future opportunities. (29 citations)
  • Winter-dormant shoot apical meristem in poplar trees shows environmental epigenetic memory. (28 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Ecology

Franck Brignolas mainly investigates Phenotypic plasticity, Epigenetics, Differentially methylated regions, Meristem and Botany. His Epigenetics study combines topics in areas such as Evolutionary biology, Acclimatization and Abiotic stress. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Epigenome and Cell biology.

The Botany study combines topics in areas such as Hydraulic conductivity and Horticulture. Franck Brignolas is involved in the study of Horticulture that focuses on Xylem in particular. The study incorporates disciplines such as Genetic variation and Genotype in addition to Range.

Best Publications

  • Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoides×Populus nigra

    Romain Monclus;Romain Monclus;Erwin Dreyer;Marc Villar;Francis M. Delmotte

  • Water stress-induced xylem hydraulic failure is a causal factor of tree mortality in beech and poplar

    Tete Severien Barigah;Olivia Charrier;Olivia Charrier;Olivia Charrier;Marie Douris;Marie Douris;Marc Bonhomme;Marc Bonhomme

  • Impact of successive drought and re-watering cycles on growth and specific leaf area of two Populus x canadensis (Moench) clones, 'Dorskamp' and 'Luisa_Avanzo'

    Nicolas Marron;Erwin Dreyer;Eric Boudouresque;Didier Delay

  • Induced Responses in Phenolic Metabolism in Two Norway Spruce Clones after Wounding and Inoculations with Ophiostoma polonicum, a Bark Beetle-Associated Fungus

    Unknown

  • Physiological traits of two Populus x euramericana clones, Luisa Avanzo and Dorskamp, during a water stress and re-watering cycle.

    Nicolas Marron;Didier Delay;Jean-Michel Petit;Erwin Dreyer

  • Productivity, leaf traits and carbon isotope discrimination in 29 Populus deltoides × P. nigra clones

    Romain Monclus;Romain Monclus;Erwin Dreyer;Francis M. Delmotte;Marc Villar

  • Diversity of leaf traits related to productivity in 31 Populus deltoides x Populus nigra clones

    Nicolas Marron;Marc Villar;Erwin Dreyer;Didier Delay

  • Common trade-offs between xylem resistance to cavitation and other physiological traits do not hold among unrelated Populus deltoides x Populus nigra hybrids.

    Régis Fichot;Régis Fichot;Tete Severien Barigah;Sylvain Chamaillard;Sylvain Chamaillard;Didier Le Thiec

  • Insights into Populus XIP aquaporins: evolutionary expansion, protein functionality, and environmental regulation

    David Lopez;Gisèle Bronner;Nicole Brunel;Nicole Brunel;Daniel Auguin;Daniel Auguin

  • Xylem anatomy correlates with gas exchange, water-use efficiency and growth performance under contrasting water regimes: evidence from Populus deltoides × Populus nigra hybrids

    Régis Fichot;Françoise Laurans;Romain Monclus;Romain Monclus;Alain Moreau

  • DNA methylating and demethylating treatments modify phenotype and cell wall differentiation state in sugarbeet cell lines.

    Adisa Causevic;Alain Delaunay;Saïda Ounnar;Michel Righezza

  • Phenolic predictors for Norway spruce resistance to the bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and an associated fungus, Ceratocystis polonica

    Franck Brignolas;François Lieutier;Daniel Sauvard;Erik Christiansen

  • Productivity, water-use efficiency and tolerance to moderate water deficit correlate in 33 poplar genotypes from a Populus deltoides × Populus trichocarpa F1 progeny

    Romain Monclus;Marc Villar;C. Barbaroux;C. Barbaroux;Catherine Bastien

  • Intra- and inter-provenance variability in phloem phenols of Picea abies and relationship to a bark beetle-associated fungus

    François Lieutier;Franck Brignolas;Daniel Sauvard;Annie Yart

  • Hydraulic efficiency and coordination with xylem resistance to cavitation, leaf function, and growth performance among eight unrelated Populus deltoides×Populus nigra hybrids

    Régis Fichot;Régis Fichot;Sylvain Chamaillard;Sylvain Chamaillard;Claire Depardieu;Claire Depardieu;Didier Le Thiec

  • Leaf proteome analysis of eight Populus xeuramericana genotypes: genetic variation in drought response and in water-use efficiency involves photosynthesis-related proteins.

    Ludovic Bonhomme;Ludovic Bonhomme;Romain Monclus;Romain Monclus;Romain Monclus;Delphine Vincent;Sabine Carpin;Sabine Carpin

  • RNAi suppression of DNA methylation affects the drought stress response and genome integrity in transgenic poplar

    Mamadou D Sow;Anne-Laure Le Gac;Régis Fichot;Sophie Lanciano;Sophie Lanciano

  • DNA methylation and histone acetylation: genotypic variations in hybrid poplars, impact of water deficit and relationships with productivity

    Delphine Gourcilleau;Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot;Didier Le Thiec;Clément Lafon-Placette;Clément Lafon-Placette

  • Changes in the epigenome and transcriptome of the poplar shoot apical meristem in response to water availability affect preferentially hormone pathways.

    Clément Lafon-Placette;Anne-Laure Le Gac;Didier Chauveau;Vincent Segura

  • Vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation in poplars: synthesis and future opportunities.

    Régis Fichot;Franck Brignolas;Hervé Cochard;Hervé Cochard;Reinhart Ceulemans

  • Methylome of DNase I sensitive chromatin in Populus trichocarpa shoot apical meristematic cells: a simplified approach revealing characteristics of gene-body DNA methylation in open chromatin state.

    Clément Lafon-Placette;Clément Lafon-Placette;Patricia Faivre-Rampant;Alain Delaunay;Alain Delaunay;Nathaniel Street

  • Winter-dormant shoot apical meristem in poplar trees shows environmental epigenetic memory.

    Anne-Laure Le Gac;Clément Lafon-Placette;Didier Chauveau;Vincent Segura

  • Genetic variation and drought response in two Populus × euramericana genotypes through 2-DE proteomic analysis of leaves from field and glasshouse cultivated plants

    Ludovic Bonhomme;Romain Monclus;Romain Monclus;Romain Monclus;Delphine Vincent;Sabine Carpin;Sabine Carpin

  • Stem xylem resistance to cavitation is related to xylem structure but not to growth and water-use efficiency at the within-population level in Populus nigra L.

    Justine Guet;Justine Guet;Régis Fichot;Camille Lédée;Camille Lédée;Françoise Laurans

Frequent Co-Authors

Hervé Cochard
Hervé Cochard INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Erwin Dreyer
Erwin Dreyer INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Christophe Plomion
Christophe Plomion University of Bordeaux
Francis Martin
Francis Martin University of Lorraine
Jörg Tost
Jörg Tost University of Paris-Saclay
Steven H. Strauss
Steven H. Strauss Oregon State University
Thierry Ameglio
Thierry Ameglio INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Jean-Marc Guehl
Jean-Marc Guehl INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Reinhart Ceulemans
Reinhart Ceulemans University of Antwerp
Stéphane Herbette
Stéphane Herbette Integrative Physics and Physiology of Fruit and Forest Trees

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Franck Brignolas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles