World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
45
Citations
8300
World Ranking
2820
National Ranking
100

Thierry Ameglio publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thierry Ameglio sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 175 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Thierry Ameglio D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thierry Ameglio sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Horticulture

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Xylem, Transpiration, Horticulture and Hydraulic conductivity. Thierry Améglio regularly ties together related areas like Water content in his Botany studies. His Xylem research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Soil science, Beech, Fagus sylvatica and Shoot.

The various areas that he examines in his Transpiration study include Soil water, Water potential, Evapotranspiration and Agronomy. Thierry Améglio works in the field of Horticulture, namely Juglans. His work deals with themes such as Cultivar and Annual growth cycle of grapevines, which intersect with Hydraulic conductivity.

His most cited work include:

  • Unraveling the Effects of Plant Hydraulics on Stomatal Closure during Water Stress in Walnut (298 citations)
  • Hydraulic architecture of trees: main concepts and results (281 citations)
  • Drought‐induced leaf shedding in walnut: evidence for vulnerability segmentation (216 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Thierry Améglio focuses on Botany, Horticulture, Xylem, Transpiration and Juglans. His research ties Sucrose and Botany together. His studies deal with areas such as Sugar, Cold acclimation, Hevea brasiliensis and Starch as well as Horticulture.

His study focuses on the intersection of Xylem and fields such as Hydraulic conductivity with connections in the field of Cultivar. His Transpiration study deals with Girdling intersecting with Cold hardening and Carbohydrate export. Thierry Améglio combines subjects such as Osmotic concentration and Orchard with his study of Juglans.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (76.42%)
  • Horticulture (55.66%)
  • Xylem (51.89%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Botany (76.42%)
  • Xylem (51.89%)
  • Cavitation (19.81%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Xylem, Cavitation, Horticulture and Ice nucleus. He regularly links together related areas like Competition in his Botany studies. Among his Xylem studies, you can observe a synthesis of other disciplines of science such as Supercooling and Severe dehydration.

His study of Juglans is a part of Horticulture. His studies link Hardiness with Juglans. The study incorporates disciplines such as Range, Temperate climate and Annual growth cycle of grapevines in addition to Phenology.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Can phenological models predict tree phenology accurately in the future? The unrevealed hurdle of endodormancy break. (97 citations)
  • Can phenological models predict tree phenology accurately in the future? The unrevealed hurdle of endodormancy break. (97 citations)
  • Effects of environmental factors and management practices on microclimate, winter physiology, and frost resistance in trees (69 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Biochemistry

His main research concerns Ecology, Frost, Cavitation, Plant phenology and Dual effect. His Frost study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Thinning, Resistance, Hardiness, Microclimate and Pruning. His Cavitation research incorporates elements of Liquid bubble, Botany, Soil science, Front and Ice nucleus.

Botany is often connected to Water Movements in his work. His study in Plant phenology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Global warming and Growing season. Picea abies is closely attributed to Xylem in his research.

Best Publications

  • Hydraulic architecture of trees: main concepts and results

    Pierre Cruiziat;Hervé Cochard;Thierry Améglio

  • Unraveling the Effects of Plant Hydraulics on Stomatal Closure during Water Stress in Walnut

    Hervé Cochard;Lluis Coll;Xavier Le Roux;Thierry Améglio

  • Drought‐induced leaf shedding in walnut: evidence for vulnerability segmentation

    M.T. Tyrée;Hervé Cochard;P. Cruiziat;B. Sinclair

  • Evaluation of a new centrifuge technique for rapid generation of xylem vulnerability curves

    Hervé Cochard;Gaëlle Damour;Christian Bodet;Ibrahim Tharwat

  • RATP: a model for simulating the spatial distribution of radiation absorption, transpiration and photosynthesis within canopies: application to an isolated tree crown

    H. Sinoquet;X. Le Roux;B. Adam;T. Ameglio

  • Significance and limits in the use of predawn leaf water potential for tree irrigation

    Thierry Améglio;Philippe Archer;Moisés Cohen;Charles Valancogne

  • Variation in cold hardiness and carbohydrate concentration from dormancy induction to bud burst among provenances of three European oak species

    Xavier Morin;Thierry Améglio;Rein Ahas;Cathy Kurz-Besson

  • Can phenological models predict tree phenology accurately in the future? The unrevealed hurdle of endodormancy break.

    Isabelle Chuine;Marc Bonhomme;Marc Bonhomme;Jean-Michel Legave;Iñaki García de Cortázar-Atauri

  • Experimental analysis of the role of water and carbon in tree stem diameter variations

    François-Alain Daudet;Thierry Améglio;Hervé Cochard;Olivier Archilla

  • Water stress-induced xylem hydraulic failure is a causal factor of tree mortality in beech and poplar

    Tete Severien Barigah;Olivia Charrier;Olivia Charrier;Olivia Charrier;Marie Douris;Marie Douris;Marc Bonhomme;Marc Bonhomme

  • Effects of environmental factors and management practices on microclimate, winter physiology, and frost resistance in trees

    Guillaume Charrier;Jérôme Ngao;Jérôme Ngao;Marc Saudreau;Marc Saudreau;Thierry Améglio;Thierry Améglio

  • Cryo-scanning electron microscopy observations of vessel content during transpiration in walnut petioles. Facts or artifacts?

    Hervé Cochard;Christian Bodet;Thierry Améglio;Pierre Cruiziat

  • Diurnal cycles of embolism formation and repair in petioles of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas)

    Vivian Zufferey;Hervé Cochard;Thierry Ameglio;Jean-Laurent Spring

  • Winter embolism, mechanisms of xylem hydraulic conductivity recovery and springtime growth patterns in walnut and peach trees

    Thierry Améglio;Christian Bodet;André Lacointe;Hervé Cochard

  • Mechanisms of xylem recovery from winter embolism in Fagus sylvatica.

    Hervé Cochard;Damien Lemoine;Thierry Améglio;André Granier

  • Temperature effects on xylem sap osmolarity in walnut trees: evidence for a vitalistic model of winter embolism repair

    Thierry Améglio;Mélanie Decourteix;Georges Alves;Vincent Valentin

  • Carbohydrate reserves as a competing sink: evidence from tapping rubber trees.

    Unakorn Silpi;André Lacointe;P. Kasempsap;S. Thanysawanyangkura

  • Testing the branch autonomy theory: a 13C/14C double-labelling experiment on differentially shaded branches

    André Lacointe;E. Deleens;Thierry Ameglio;B. Saint-Joanis

  • Carbohydrate uptake from xylem vessels and its distribution among stem tissues and buds in walnut (Juglans regia L.)

    Marc Bonhomme;Médéric Peuch;Thierry Ameglio;Rémy Rageau

  • Winter stem xylem pressure in walnut trees: effects of carbohydrates, cooling and freezing.

    Thierry Améglio;Frank W. Ewers;Hervé Cochard;Michel Martignac

Frequent Co-Authors

Hervé Cochard
Hervé Cochard INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
André Lacointe
André Lacointe INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Stefan Mayr
Stefan Mayr University of Innsbruck
Soulaiman Sakr
Soulaiman Sakr University of Angers
Stéphane Herbette
Stéphane Herbette Integrative Physics and Physiology of Fruit and Forest Trees
Frank W. Ewers
Frank W. Ewers California State Polytechnic University
Hervé Sinoquet
Hervé Sinoquet University of Clermont Auvergne
Isabelle Chuine
Isabelle Chuine Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
André Granier
André Granier INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Kathy Steppe
Kathy Steppe Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thierry Ameglio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles