World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
58
Citations
11729
World Ranking
1347
National Ranking
352

Frank W. Ewers publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Ewers sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 120 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Frank W. Ewers D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Ewers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Shrub

Frank W. Ewers mainly focuses on Botany, Xylem, Water transport, Shrub and Chaparral. His Botany research integrates issues from Compressed air and Horticulture. His work carried out in the field of Compressed air brings together such families of science as Woody plant and Biomedical engineering.

The various areas that he examines in his Woody plant study include Crown and Habitat. His Xylem study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Liana. His studies examine the connections between Chaparral and genetics, as well as such issues in Rhamnaceae, with regards to Ceanothus megacarpus, Root system and Rhamnus.

His most cited work include:

  • The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants (1133 citations)
  • Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance (267 citations)
  • Relationships among xylem transport, biomechanics and storage in stems and roots of nine Rhamnaceae species of the California chaparral. (236 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Botany, Xylem, Horticulture, Chaparral and Water transport. His research related to Shoot, Liana, Shrub, Woody plant and Ceanothus might be considered part of Botany. He works mostly in the field of Woody plant, limiting it down to concerns involving Hydraulic conductance and, occasionally, Biomedical engineering and Compressed air.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Young's modulus, Phloem and Transpiration. Many of his research projects under Horticulture are closely connected to Air embolism and Embolism with Air embolism and Embolism, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His Chaparral research includes elements of Rhamnaceae and Evergreen.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (88.29%)
  • Xylem (68.47%)
  • Horticulture (18.92%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2005-2020)?

  • Botany (88.29%)
  • Xylem (68.47%)
  • Chaparral (18.92%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Frank W. Ewers mainly investigates Botany, Xylem, Chaparral, Shrub and Ecology. His research ties Irrigation and Botany together. Frank W. Ewers performs integrative Xylem and Water transport research in his work.

His Chaparral course of study focuses on Evergreen and Deciduous. He interconnects Arid, Dry season, Woody plant and Agronomy in the investigation of issues within Shrub. While the research belongs to areas of Ecology, he spends his time largely on the problem of Stomatal conductance, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Plant ecology, Juniper, Agave, Deserts and xeric shrublands and Canopy.

Between 2005 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Relationships among xylem transport, biomechanics and storage in stems and roots of nine Rhamnaceae species of the California chaparral. (236 citations)
  • CAVITATION RESISTANCE AMONG 26 CHAPARRAL SPECIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (191 citations)
  • Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean‐type climate region of South Africa (131 citations)

Best Publications

  • The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants

    Melvin T. Tyree;Frank W. Ewers

  • Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance

    Anna L. Jacobsen;Frank W. Ewers;R. Brandon Pratt;William A. Paddock

  • Relationships among xylem transport, biomechanics and storage in stems and roots of nine Rhamnaceae species of the California chaparral.

    R. B. Pratt;A. L. Jacobsen;F. W. Ewers;S. D. Davis

  • Conduit diameter and drought‐induced embolism in Salvia mellifera Greene (Labiatae)

    K. R. Hargrave;K. J. Kolb;F. W. Ewers;S.D. Davis

  • Xylem' Structure and Water Conduction in Conifer Trees, Dicot Trees, and Llanas

    Frank W. Ewers

  • Evolution of xylem physiology

    Pieter Baas;Frank W Ewers;Stephen D Davis;Elisabeth A Wheeler

  • CAVITATION RESISTANCE AMONG 26 CHAPARRAL SPECIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

    Anna L. Jacobsen;R. Brandon Pratt;Frank W. Ewers;Stephen D. Davis

  • Shoot dieback during prolonged drought in Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) chaparral of California: a possible case of hydraulic failure

    Stephen D. Davis;Frank W. Ewers;John S. Sperry;Kimberly A. Portwood

  • The mechanism of water‐stress‐induced embolism in two species of chaparral shrubs

    J. A. Jarbeau;F. W. Ewers;S. D. Davis

  • Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa

    Anna L. Jacobsen;Lize Agenbag;Karen J. Esler;R. Brandon Pratt

  • A survey of vessel dimensions in stems of tropical lianas and other growth forms

    Frank W. Ewers;Jack B. Fisher;Jack B. Fisher;S. T. Chiu

  • Longevity of needle fascicles of Pinus longaeva (Bristlecone pine) and other North American pines.

    Frank W. Ewers;Rudolf Schmid

  • TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING VESSEL LENGTHS AND DIAMETERS IN STEMS OF WOODY PLANTS

    Frank W. Ewers;Frank W. Ewers;Jack B. Fisher;Jack B. Fisher

  • Water relations of a tropical vine-like bamboo (Rhipidocladum racemiflorum): root pressures, vulnerability to cavitation and seasonal changes in embolism

    H. Cochard;F.W. Ewers;M.T. Tyree;M.T. Tyree

  • New evidence for large negative xylem pressures and their measurement by the pressure chamber method

    J. S. Sperry;N. Z. Saliendra;W. T. Pockman;H. Cochard

  • Why vines have narrow stems: Histological trends in Bauhinia (Fabaceae).

    Frank W. Ewers;Jack B. Fisher;Jack B. Fisher

  • Cavitation resistance and seasonal hydraulics differ among three arid Californian plant communities

    Anna L. Jacobsen;R. Brandon Pratt;Stephen D. Davis;Frank W. Ewers

  • The Biology of Vines : Water flux and xylem structure in vines

    Frank W. Ewers;Jack B. Fisher;Klaus Fichtner

  • Xylem dysfunction caused by water stress and freezing in two species of co-occurring chaparral shrubs

    S. J. Langan;F. W. Ewers;S. D. Davis

  • A global analysis of xylem vessel length in woody plants

    Anna L. Jacobsen;R. Brandon Pratt;Michael F. Tobin;Uwe G. Hacke

  • The hydraulic architecture of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis)

    Frank W. Ewers;Martin H. Zimmermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack B. Fisher
Jack B. Fisher Florida International University
Anna L. Jacobsen
Anna L. Jacobsen California State University, Bakersfield
R. Brandon Pratt
R. Brandon Pratt California State University, Bakersfield
Hervé Cochard
Hervé Cochard INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Thierry Ameglio
Thierry Ameglio INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
John S. Sperry
John S. Sperry University of Utah
Melvin T. Tyree
Melvin T. Tyree Zhejiang Normal University
Lawren Sack
Lawren Sack University of California, Los Angeles
William T. Pockman
William T. Pockman University of New Mexico
Uwe G. Hacke
Uwe G. Hacke University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Frank W. Ewers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles