World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
10310
World Ranking
5507
National Ranking
320

Kamil Uludag publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kamil Uludag sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 145 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kamil Uludag D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kamil Uludag sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kamil Uludag is affiliated with the University Health Network in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on medical imaging and neuroscience, with significant contributions in advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques and neuroimaging applications.

The scientist's work spans two main fields of study: Medicine and Neuroscience. Within these, the subfields of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition are prominent.

Key research topics include:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes

Uludag has published extensively across multiple venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • NeuroImage
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

The researcher has multiple recent papers that illustrate their focus on brain imaging and functional MRI methodologies. Selected recent publications are:

  • Determining laminar neuronal activity from BOLD fMRI using a generative model, 2021, Progress in Neurobiology
  • Sub-millimetre resolution laminar fMRI using Arterial Spin Labelling in humans at 7 T, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Layer-dependent functional connectivity methods, 2020, Progress in Neurobiology
  • Dynamic behavior of the locus coeruleus during arousal-related memory processing in a multi-modal 7T fMRI paradigm, 2020, eLife
  • Unraveling the contributions to the neuromelanin-MRI contrast, 2020, Brain Structure and Function

Collaboration plays an important role in their research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Sriranga Kashyap
  • Lars Kasper
  • Dimo Ivanov
  • Jacob Schulman
  • Alexander Jaffray

Best Publications

  • Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation.

    Richard B. Buxton;Kâmil Uludağ;David J. Dubowitz;Thomas T. Liu

  • Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging

    Martin S. Judenhofer;Hans F. Wehrl;Danny F. Newport;Ciprian Catana

  • Locus coeruleus imaging as a biomarker for noradrenergic dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases

    Matthew J Betts;Matthew J Betts;Evgeniya Kirilina;Evgeniya Kirilina;Maria C G Otaduy;Dimo Ivanov

  • Coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during physiological activation and deactivation measured with fMRI

    Kâmil Uludağ;David J. Dubowitz;Elizabeth J. Yoder;Khaled Restom

  • Towards a standard analysis for functional near-infrared imaging.

    Matthias L Schroeter;Markus M Bücheler;Karsten Müller;Kâmil Uludağ;Kâmil Uludağ

  • General overview on the merits of multimodal neuroimaging data fusion.

    Kâmil Uludağ;Alard Roebroeck

  • Habituation of the Visually Evoked Potential and Its Vascular Response: Implications for Neurovascular Coupling in the Healthy Adult

    Hellmuth Obrig;Heike Israel;Matthias Kohl-Bareis;Kamil Uludag

  • High-resolution in vivo imaging of human locus coeruleus by magnetization transfer MRI at 3T and 7T.

    Nikos Priovoulos;Heidi I.L. Jacobs;Heidi I.L. Jacobs;Dimo Ivanov;Kamil Uludag

  • Investigating the post-stimulus undershoot of the BOLD signal—a simultaneous fMRI and fNIRS study

    Matthias L. Schroeter;Thomas Kupka;Toralf Mildner;Kâmil Uludağ

  • Aerobic Exercise Training Improves Cerebral Blood Flow and Executive Function: A Randomized, Controlled Cross-Over Trial in Sedentary Older Men.

    Jordi P. D. Kleinloog;Ronald P. Mensink;Dimo Ivanov;Jos J. Adam

  • Non-BOLD contrast for laminar fMRI in humans: CBF, CBV, and CMR O2 .

    Laurentius Huber;Kâmil Uludağ;Harald E Möller

  • Cross talk in the Lambert-Beer calculation for near-infrared wavelengths estimated by Monte Carlo simulations.

    K. Uludag;M. Kohl;J. Steinbrink;Hellmuth Obrig

  • Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation: Basic Concepts and Novel Perspectives

    Clement Hamani;Gerson Florence;Helmut Heinsen;Birgit R. Plantinga

  • Physiologically informed dynamic causal modeling of fMRI data

    Martin Havlicek;Alard Roebroeck;Karl J. Friston;Anna Gardumi

  • Caffeine alters the temporal dynamics of the visual BOLD response

    Thomas T. Liu;Yashar Behzadi;Khaled Restom;Kamil Uludag

  • Separability and cross talk: Optimizing dual wavelength combinations for near-infrared spectroscopy of the adult head

    Kâmil Uludağ;Jens Steinbrink;Arno Villringer;Hellmuth Obrig

  • Individualized parcellation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson's disease with 7T MRI.

    Birgit R. Plantinga;Yasin Temel;Yuval Duchin;Kâmil Uludag

  • Layer-dependent functional connectivity methods.

    Laurentius Huber;Emily S Finn;Yuhui Chai;Rainer Goebel

  • Techniques for blood volume fMRI with VASO: From low-resolution mapping towards sub-millimeter layer-dependent applications

    Laurentius Huber;Dimo Ivanov;Daniel A Handwerker;Sean Marrett

  • The impact of ultra-high field MRI on cognitive and computational neuroimaging.

    Federico De Martino;Federico De Martino;Essa Yacoub;Valentin G. Kemper;Michelle Moerel

  • The effect of spatial resolution on decoding accuracy in fMRI multivariate pattern analysis.

    Anna Gardumi;Dimo Ivanov;Lars Hausfeld;Giancarlo Valente

Frequent Co-Authors

Hellmuth Obrig
Hellmuth Obrig Max Planck Society
Alard Roebroeck
Alard Roebroeck Maastricht University
Heidi I.L. Jacobs
Heidi I.L. Jacobs Harvard University
Fabrizio Esposito
Fabrizio Esposito University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Robert Turner
Robert Turner Max Planck Society
Christoph Kayser
Christoph Kayser Bielefeld University
Yasin Temel
Yasin Temel Maastricht University
Nikos K. Logothetis
Nikos K. Logothetis Chinese Academy of Sciences
Arno Villringer
Arno Villringer Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Klaus Scheffler
Klaus Scheffler Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and future career opportunities. Students seeking flexibility may consider enrolling in an accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited program, which can help them graduate sooner and fast-track their entry into the workforce.

A neuroscience background complements many high-demand fields. Degrees in this area are recognized among the top degrees in the world due to their interdisciplinary nature and relevance to both healthcare and tech sectors. Many graduates go on to pursue further studies or transition to some of the most profitable majors—such as medicine, biotechnology, or data science—amplifying their career prospects.

For those concerned about affordability, there are numerous online schools that accept fafsa, making it easier to access financial aid and reduce educational expenses. These pathways offer flexibility, value, and strong earning potential for aspiring neuroscience professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Kamil Uludag

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles