World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
35
Citations
7462
World Ranking
6643
National Ranking
3221

Linda Zagzebski publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Zagzebski sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 152 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Linda Zagzebski D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Zagzebski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Linda Zagzebski is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma in the United States. Their academic focus spans primarily the fields of Arts and Humanities as well as Social Sciences, contributing a total of 37 publications in Philosophy and 14 in complementary social science disciplines.

Their research covers several subfields, including Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, and Education. Prominent topics within their work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics; Theology and Philosophy of Evil; Medieval Philosophy and Theology; Philosophical Ethics and Theory; Political Philosophy and Ethics; Classical Philosophy and Thought; and Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought.

Selected recent papers authored by Linda Zagzebski include:

  • Virtue Ethics (2023), published in Think
  • Divine subjectivity and intersubjectivity (2023), published in Religious Studies
  • Intersubjective reasons and the transmission of religious knowledge (2022), published in Synthese
  • Issue Information (2021), published in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
  • Issue Information (2020), published in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

Frequent publication venues for Zagzebski's work include Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Think, Roczniki Filozoficzne, Religious Studies, and Synthese.

They have collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Felicia Nimue, Ackerman Robert, Adams Louise, Antony Robert, and Audi Block.

Linda Zagzebski has several book publications with notable presses. They have published two editions of The Two Greatest Ideas in 2021 with Princeton University Press, and Epistemic Values in 2020 with Oxford University Press.

In 2011, they were recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

Best Publications

  • Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge

    Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

  • Exemplarist Moral Theory

    Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

  • The Inescapability of Gettier Problems

    Linda Zagzebski

  • Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief

    Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

  • The Search for the Source of Epistemic Good

    Linda Zagzebski

  • Intellectual virtue : perspectives from ethics and epistemology

    Michael R. DePaul;Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

  • Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility

    Abrol Fairweather;Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

  • EXEMPLARIST VIRTUE THEORY

    Linda Zagzebski

  • Divine Motivation theory: Frontmatter

    Unknown

  • Emotion and Moral Judgment

    Linda Zagzebski

  • The moral gap : Kantian ethics, human limits, and God's assistance

    Linda Zagzebski;John E. Hare

  • The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge

    Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

  • Divine Motivation Theory

    Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

  • Recovering Understanding

    Unknown

  • Moral Exemplars in Theory and Practice.

    Linda Zagzebski

  • What is Knowledge

    Linda Zagzebski

  • The Uniqueness of Persons

    Linda Zagzebski

  • Intellectual Motivation and the Good of Truth

    Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

  • Does libertarian freedom require alternate possibilities

    Linda Zagzebski

  • Omnisubjectivity: Why It Is a Divine Attribute

    Linda Zagzebski

  • The Virtues of God and the Foundations of Ethics

    Linda Zagzebski

  • I—Admiration and the Admirable

    Linda Zagzebski

  • Rational faith : Catholic responses to Reformed epistemology

    Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

  • The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge.

    Timothy O'Connor;Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

Frequent Co-Authors

Alvin I. Goldman
Alvin I. Goldman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John Greco
John Greco Georgetown University
Ernest Sosa
Ernest Sosa Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
William P. Alston
William P. Alston Syracuse University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advances in online education have opened new doors for students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities. Today, many universities in the USA offer flexible options to earn degrees in high-demand fields, allowing students to balance their studies with work and life commitments.

If you’re seeking a fast-track to your career, consider one of the accelerated social work degree programs available online. For those drawn to the study of human behavior, accelerated psychology programs online offer a quicker route to entering this rewarding field.

Counseling is another popular career pathway. Aspiring counselors should look for cacrep-accredited programs online to ensure their credentials meet industry standards and licensing requirements. Additionally, those interested in supporting families can explore a marriage and family therapy degree online to pursue roles guiding individuals and families through challenging times.

These online pathways not only make education more accessible but also align with current workforce needs, helping graduates make a meaningful impact in their communities.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Zagzebski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles