World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
47694
World Ranking
6781
National Ranking
3672

Julian C. Stanley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian C. Stanley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 268 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Julian C. Stanley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian C. Stanley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julian C. Stanley is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences, with particular work in the fields of education, political science and international relations, cultural studies, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's scholarly output includes contributions to multiple topics, reflecting a diverse but interconnected range of interests. These main topics include:

  • Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Education Systems and Policy
  • Higher Education Learning Practices
  • Multicultural Education and Local Wisdom
  • Educational Research and Methods
  • Islamic Studies and Radicalism

Julian C. Stanley has published research in the MODERATE Journal of Religious Education and Social. Their recent paper, titled "Reflection of Deobandi Religious Education for Multicultural Education in Indonesia," was published in 2024 by this journal.

Collaborative work includes frequent co-authorship with Yusak Tanasyah, with whom they have co-published at least one paper. This collaboration aligns with the thematic focus on multicultural education and religious education as seen in their recent publication.

Best Publications

  • Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research

    Donald Thomas Campbell;Julian C. Stanley;Nathaniel Lees Gage

  • Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact?

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Consequences in High School and College of Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability: A Longitudinal Perspective

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • INEQUITY IN EQUITY: How "Equity" Can Lead to Inequity for High-Potential Students

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigación social

    Donald T. Campbell;Julian C. Stanley

  • Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description, and Development (MT:D3)

    Julian C. Stanley;Daniel P. Keating;Lynn H. Fox

  • Academic precocity, aspects of its development

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Extreme Measures for the Exceptionally Gifted in Mathematics and Science

    Daniel P. Keating;Julian C. Stanley

  • The Gifted and the Creative: A Fifty-Year Perspective

    Robert B. Davis;Julian C. Stanley;William C. George;Cecilia H. Solano

  • Five Years of Early Entrants: Predicting Successful Achievement in College

    Linda E. Brody;Susan G. Assouline;Julian C. Stanley

  • SAT-M Scores of Highly Selected Students in Shanghai Tested When Less than 13 Years Old.

    Julian C Stanley

  • Intellectually Talented Boys and Girls: Educational Profiles

    Camilla P. Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Differential Course-taking Hypothesis Revisited

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C Stanley

  • Structure of intelligence in intellectually precocious children and in their parents

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley;Marshall K. Kirk;Alan B. Zonderman

  • Helping students learn only what they don't already know.

    Julian C. Stanley

  • Gender-related differences on the College Board's Advanced Placement and Achievement tests, 1982–1992.

    Heinrich Stumpf;Julian C. Stanley

  • Group Data on High School Grade Point Averages and Scores on Academic Aptitude Tests As Predictors of Institutional Graduation Rates

    Heinrich Stumpf;Julian C. Stanley

  • Response :Mathematical Ability: Is Sex a Factor?

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology@@@Readings in Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences@@@Mathematics in the Behavioral and Social Sciences

    William Schmidt;Gene V. Glass;Julian C. Stanley;Emil F. Heermann

  • Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain:

    William B. Michael;Julian C. Stanley;Dale L. Bolton

  • Review: J.C. Stanley, D.P. Keating, and L.H. Fox's (eds.) Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description and Development

    Kenneth J. Travers;Julian C. Stanley;Daniel P. Keating;Lynn H. Fox

Frequent Co-Authors

Camilla Persson Benbow
Camilla Persson Benbow Vanderbilt University
Daniel P. Keating
Daniel P. Keating University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gene V. Glass
Gene V. Glass Arizona State University
Alan B. Zonderman
Alan B. Zonderman National Institutes of Health
Donald T. Campbell
Donald T. Campbell Lehigh University
Joseph J. Glutting
Joseph J. Glutting University of Delaware
Paul A. McDermott
Paul A. McDermott University of Pennsylvania
Maxine Greene
Maxine Greene Columbia University
Patrick Suppes
Patrick Suppes Stanford University
William H. Schmidt
William H. Schmidt Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees can open the door to a range of fulfilling careers, including school counseling, mental health counseling, and therapy. Many students choose to pursue flexible, accredited online programs that prepare them for state licensure and specialized counseling roles.

The pathway to becoming a professional counselor varies by state, with different educational and certification requirements to navigate. For instance, if you are interested in the fastest way to become a counselor in South Dakota or want to learn about the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Tennessee, exploring state-specific guidance is essential.

Similarly, those looking into the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Texas or the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Utah will find that each state requires unique coursework, clinical experience, and licensing exams. Always verify the specific educational and practicum requirements in the state where you intend to practice to ensure a streamlined and successful career journey.

Best Scientists Citing Julian C. Stanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles