World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6781 6319 3672 3337 268 47694

Julian C. Stanley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julian C. Stanley between 1951 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julian C. Stanley published across 74 years, from 1951 to 2024, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 1983. 1 of the 320 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1951 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 1983. 1951: 3 publications 1952: 1 publication 1953: 4 publications 1954: 4 publications 1955: 8 publications 1956: 6 publications 1957: 14 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 5 publications 1960: 1 publication 1961: 4 publications 1962: 4 publications 1963: 7 publications 1964: 2 publications 1965: 5 publications 1966: 10 publications 1967: 13 publications 1968: 7 publications 1969: 8 publications 1970: 8 publications 1971: 6 publications 1972: 9 publications 1973: 6 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 5 publications 1976: 13 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 9 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 15 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1951 2024

320 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julian C. Stanley: publications per year, 1951 to 2024
Year Publications
1951 3
1952 1
1953 4
1954 4
1955 8
1956 6
1957 14
1958 0
1959 5
1960 1
1961 4
1962 4
1963 7
1964 2
1965 5
1966 10
1967 13
1968 7
1969 8
1970 8
1971 6
1972 9
1973 6
1974 1
1975 5
1976 13
1977 6
1978 9
1979 5
1980 8
1981 4
1982 5
1983 15
1984 2
1985 5
1986 7
1987 7
1988 8
1989 4
1990 5
1991 5
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 4
1997 4
1998 3
1999 0
2000 3
2001 3
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 2
2011 0
2012 0
2013 3
2014 4
2015 6
2016 9
2017 7
2018 7
2019 1
2020 1
2021 0
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 320
Download as CSV

Julian C. Stanley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian C. Stanley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 268 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171 268
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Julian C. Stanley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian C. Stanley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Julian C. Stanley is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences, with particular work in the fields of education, political science and international relations, cultural studies, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's scholarly output includes contributions to multiple topics, reflecting a diverse but interconnected range of interests. These main topics include:

  • Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Education Systems and Policy
  • Higher Education Learning Practices
  • Multicultural Education and Local Wisdom
  • Educational Research and Methods
  • Islamic Studies and Radicalism

Julian C. Stanley has published research in the MODERATE Journal of Religious Education and Social. Their recent paper, titled "Reflection of Deobandi Religious Education for Multicultural Education in Indonesia," was published in 2024 by this journal.

Collaborative work includes frequent co-authorship with Yusak Tanasyah, with whom they have co-published at least one paper. This collaboration aligns with the thematic focus on multicultural education and religious education as seen in their recent publication.

Best Publications

  • Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research

    Donald Thomas Campbell;Julian C. Stanley;Nathaniel Lees Gage

  • Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact?

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Consequences in High School and College of Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability: A Longitudinal Perspective

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • INEQUITY IN EQUITY: How "Equity" Can Lead to Inequity for High-Potential Students

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigación social

    Donald T. Campbell;Julian C. Stanley

  • Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description, and Development (MT:D3)

    Julian C. Stanley;Daniel P. Keating;Lynn H. Fox

  • Academic precocity, aspects of its development

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Extreme Measures for the Exceptionally Gifted in Mathematics and Science

    Daniel P. Keating;Julian C. Stanley

  • The Gifted and the Creative: A Fifty-Year Perspective

    Robert B. Davis;Julian C. Stanley;William C. George;Cecilia H. Solano

  • Five Years of Early Entrants: Predicting Successful Achievement in College

    Linda E. Brody;Susan G. Assouline;Julian C. Stanley

  • SAT-M Scores of Highly Selected Students in Shanghai Tested When Less than 13 Years Old.

    Julian C Stanley

  • Intellectually Talented Boys and Girls: Educational Profiles

    Camilla P. Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Differential Course-taking Hypothesis Revisited

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C Stanley

  • Structure of intelligence in intellectually precocious children and in their parents

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley;Marshall K. Kirk;Alan B. Zonderman

  • Helping students learn only what they don't already know.

    Julian C. Stanley

  • Gender-related differences on the College Board's Advanced Placement and Achievement tests, 1982–1992.

    Heinrich Stumpf;Julian C. Stanley

  • Group Data on High School Grade Point Averages and Scores on Academic Aptitude Tests As Predictors of Institutional Graduation Rates

    Heinrich Stumpf;Julian C. Stanley

  • Response :Mathematical Ability: Is Sex a Factor?

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology@@@Readings in Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences@@@Mathematics in the Behavioral and Social Sciences

    William Schmidt;Gene V. Glass;Julian C. Stanley;Emil F. Heermann

  • Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain:

    William B. Michael;Julian C. Stanley;Dale L. Bolton

  • Review: J.C. Stanley, D.P. Keating, and L.H. Fox's (eds.) Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description and Development

    Kenneth J. Travers;Julian C. Stanley;Daniel P. Keating;Lynn H. Fox

Frequent Co-Authors

Camilla Persson Benbow
Camilla Persson Benbow Vanderbilt University
Daniel P. Keating
Daniel P. Keating University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gene V. Glass
Gene V. Glass Arizona State University
Alan B. Zonderman
Alan B. Zonderman National Institutes of Health
Donald T. Campbell
Donald T. Campbell Lehigh University
Joseph J. Glutting
Joseph J. Glutting University of Delaware
Paul A. McDermott
Paul A. McDermott University of Pennsylvania
Maxine Greene
Maxine Greene Columbia University
Patrick Suppes
Patrick Suppes Stanford University
William H. Schmidt
William H. Schmidt Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees can open the door to a range of fulfilling careers, including school counseling, mental health counseling, and therapy. Many students choose to pursue flexible, accredited online programs that prepare them for state licensure and specialized counseling roles.

The pathway to becoming a professional counselor varies by state, with different educational and certification requirements to navigate. For instance, if you are interested in the fastest way to become a counselor in South Dakota or want to learn about the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Tennessee, exploring state-specific guidance is essential.

Similarly, those looking into the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Texas or the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Utah will find that each state requires unique coursework, clinical experience, and licensing exams. Always verify the specific educational and practicum requirements in the state where you intend to practice to ensure a streamlined and successful career journey.

Best Scientists Citing Julian C. Stanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles