World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Donald T. Campbell

Donald T. Campbell

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
103393
World Ranking
2749
National Ranking
1580

Donald T. Campbell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald T. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Donald T. Campbell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald T. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1981 - Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award, American Educational Research Association
  • 1973 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Donald T. Campbell was affiliated with Lehigh University in the United States. Their career included contributions to educational research that were formally recognized through awards and honors.

The notable awards received include the Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award from the American Educational Research Association in 1981 and membership in the National Academy of Sciences in 1973.

Best Publications

  • Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research

    Donald Thomas Campbell;Julian C. Stanley;Nathaniel Lees Gage

  • Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

    Donald T. Campbell;Donald W. Fiske

  • Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference

    William R. Shadish;Thomas D. Cook;Donald Thomas Campbell

  • Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes.

    Donald T. Campbell

  • Reforms as experiments

    Donald T. Campbell

  • Hedonic relativism and planning the good society

    P. Brickman;Donald T. Campbell

  • Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences

    Eugene J. Webb;Donald T. Campbell;Richard D. Schwartz;Lee Sechrest

  • Ethnocentrism: theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior

    Robert Alan LeVine;Donald Thomas Campbell

  • Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities

    Donald T. Campbell

  • Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment

    Donald L. Thistlethwaite;Donald T. Campbell

  • Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings.

    Donald T. Campbell

  • On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition.

    Donald T. Campbell

  • On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition.

    Donald T. Campbell

  • The Informant in Quantitative Research

    Donald T. Campbell

  • Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change.

    Donald T. Campbell

  • The influence of culture on visual perception

    Marshall H. Segall;Donald Thomas Campbell;Melville J. Herskovits

  • Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity.

    Donald T. Campbell

  • Social Attitudes and Other Acquired Behavioral Dispositions.

    Donald T. Campbell

  • Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives

    D. T. Campbell

  • Nonreactive Measures in the Social Sciences

    Donald T. Campbell;Richard D. Schwartz

  • Stereotypes and the perception of group differences.

    Donald T. Campbell

  • Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements.

    Norman Miller;Donald T. Campbell

  • Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence.

    Marilynn B. Brewer;Donald Thomas Campbell

  • Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences.

    Richard J. Hill;Eugene J. Webb;Donald T. Campbell;Richard D. Swartz

  • Cultural Differences in the Perception of Geometric Illusions

    Marshall H. Segall;Donald T. Campbell;Melville J. Herskovits

  • The Influence of Culture on Visual Perception.

    Helen Blyth;Marshall H. Segall;Donald T. Campbell;Melville J. Herskovits

  • Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences

    Paul Gump;Eugene J. Webb;Donald T. Campbell;Richard D. Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Marilynn B. Brewer
Marilynn B. Brewer The Ohio State University
William D. Crano
William D. Crano Claremont Graduate University
Loren J. Chapman
Loren J. Chapman University of Wisconsin–Madison
Julian C. Stanley
Julian C. Stanley Johns Hopkins University
Edwin G. Boring
Edwin G. Boring Harvard University
Norman Miller
Norman Miller University of Southern California
Thomas F. Pettigrew
Thomas F. Pettigrew University of California, Santa Cruz
Norman E. Spear
Norman E. Spear Binghamton University
James V. Wertsch
James V. Wertsch Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a variety of online learning opportunities and career pathways. One growing area is the field of substance abuse counseling, where professionals help individuals overcome addiction and lead healthier lives. The process to enter this rewarding field can vary based on your location and specific career goals.

For instance, if you're interested in how to become a substance abuse counselor in Portland, you'll find that each state has unique educational and licensing requirements. Similarly, becoming a substance abuse counselor in Raleigh requires an understanding of North Carolina's certification process.

In states like Nevada, there are specific Reno substance abuse counselors education requirements that you must meet before starting your career. You can also explore what’s needed for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Richmond if you’re considering a path in Virginia.

Many programs now offer flexible online degrees, making it easier than ever to get started in this important profession. Whichever path you choose, the need for caring, skilled counselors continues to grow nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Donald T. Campbell

Recently Published Articles