World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
18025
World Ranking
7077
National Ranking
3822

Edwin G. Boring publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin G. Boring sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 208 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Edwin G. Boring D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin G. Boring sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1932 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Edwin G. Boring was affiliated with Harvard University in the United States during their academic career. The available information does not include recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues associated with their work.

Throughout their career, Edwin G. Boring was recognized as a member of the National Academy of Sciences, an honor granted in 1932.

There is no detailed data on the main fields of study, subfields, or principal research topics that defined Boring's scientific contributions. Similarly, there is no record of book publications or other forms of scholarly output in the provided data.

Boring is recorded as deceased, and all accounts of their work refer to past contributions within academic and scientific contexts. The overall details establish a basic framework of their academic presence without extensive elaboration on specific research domains or publications.

Best Publications

  • A History of Experimental Psychology.

    Edwin Garrigues Boring

  • Elements of psychophysics

    Gustav Theodor Fechner;Helmut E. Adler;Davis H. Howes;Edwin Garrigues Boring

  • Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology

    Harlow W. Ades;Lewis White Beck;Edwin G. Boring

  • A history of experimental psychology, 2nd ed.

    Edwin G. Boring

  • Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant

    Alfred H. Holway;Edwin G. Boring

  • History of Experimental Psychology.

    C. E. Benson;Edwin C. Boring

  • A History of Medical Psychology

    Edwin G. Boring;Gregory Zilboorg;George W. Henry

  • A history of introspection.

    Edwin G. Boring

  • The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems

    Edwin G. Boring;James J. Gibson

  • A new ambiguous figure.

    Edwin G. Boring

  • The physical dimensions of consciousness

    Edwin Garrigues Boring

  • Foundations of psychology

    Edwin Garrigues Boring;Herbert Sidney Langfeld;Harry Porter Weld

  • The derivation of subjective scales from just noticeable differences.

    Unknown

  • The Stimulus-Error

    Edwin G. Boring

  • A source book in the history of psychology

    Richard J. Herrnstein;Edwin Garrigues Boring

  • The nature and history of experimental control.

    Edwin G. Boring

  • History, psychology, and science: selected papers.

    Edwin Garrigues Boring;Robert Irving Watson;Donald Thomas Campbell

  • Important psychologists, 1600–1967

    Edith L. Annin;Edwin G. Boring;Robert I. Watson

  • Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology

    Edwin Garrigues Boring

  • The perception of the visual world.

    Edwin G. Boring

  • Helmholtz's treatise on physiological optics.

    Edwin G. Boring

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernest R. Hilgard
Ernest R. Hilgard Stanford University
James J. Gibson
James J. Gibson Cornell University
Richard J. Herrnstein
Richard J. Herrnstein Harvard University
Lloyd Kaufman
Lloyd Kaufman New York University
Carl I. Hovland
Carl I. Hovland Yale University
Gordon W. Allport
Gordon W. Allport Harvard University
Neal E. Miller
Neal E. Miller Rockefeller University
Edward Chace Tolman
Edward Chace Tolman University of California, Berkeley
Donald T. Campbell
Donald T. Campbell Lehigh University
Ward Edwards
Ward Edwards University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Psychology in the USA, exploring related online degrees and future career pathways is essential. Many psychology graduates aim to become licensed therapists, requiring a combination of advanced education and supervised clinical experience. Requirements can vary by state and city, so understanding local regulations is crucial before beginning your journey.

For instance, becoming a licensed therapist in Jacksonville involves specific steps such as obtaining a master’s degree, accumulating supervised hours, and passing a state exam. Similarly, licensed therapist requirements in Jersey City detail local education and licensing processes.

Pathways also differ across regions. For example, becoming a licensed therapist in Kansas City outlines unique requirements compared to Laredo licensed therapist requirements. Aspiring professionals should research the requirements for their target location to ensure they choose the right online degree program that aligns with their career goals.

With the right education and a clear understanding of local licensing processes, online degrees in psychology can open doors to a rewarding career helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin G. Boring

Recently Published Articles