World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 69 2328 1353 189 28072

Neal E. Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Neal E. Miller between 1950 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Neal E. Miller published across 74 years, from 1950 to 2023, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1965. 2 of the 194 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1965. 1950: 5 publications 1951: 6 publications 1952: 7 publications 1953: 1 publication 1954: 2 publications 1955: 1 publication 1956: 1 publication 1957: 4 publications 1958: 5 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 5 publications 1961: 4 publications 1962: 4 publications 1963: 10 publications 1964: 4 publications 1965: 11 publications 1966: 6 publications 1967: 4 publications 1968: 9 publications 1969: 9 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 8 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications
1950 2023

194 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Neal E. Miller: publications per year, 1950 to 2023
Year Publications
1950 5
1951 6
1952 7
1953 1
1954 2
1955 1
1956 1
1957 4
1958 5
1959 0
1960 5
1961 4
1962 4
1963 10
1964 4
1965 11
1966 6
1967 4
1968 9
1969 9
1970 2
1971 2
1972 4
1973 4
1974 2
1975 4
1976 4
1977 4
1978 2
1979 2
1980 4
1981 5
1982 4
1983 4
1984 2
1985 4
1986 2
1987 2
1988 3
1989 1
1990 0
1991 2
1992 6
1993 1
1994 8
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 1
2006 1
2007 0
2008 3
2009 0
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 3
2018 1
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 2
Total 194
Download as CSV

Neal E. Miller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neal E. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 189 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 189
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Neal E. Miller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neal E. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 69
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1991 - APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association.
  • 1989 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 1983 - APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research
  • 1983 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 1964 - US President's National Medal of Science "For [his] sustained and imaginative research on principles of learning and motivation and illuminating behavioral analysis of the effects of direct electrical stimulation of the brain.", Presented by President Johnson at a White House Ceremony in the East Room on February 8, 1965.
  • 1959 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 1958 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1951 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Neal E. Miller was affiliated with Rockefeller University in the United States. Their academic contributions spanned several topics primarily under the broad field of Medicine. The main areas of research included Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Medical Image Segmentation Techniques, Cardiac Tumors and Thrombi, Aortic Thrombus and Embolism, and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes.

Their publications appeared in specialized venues such as Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Two notable papers included "Measuring Efficiency of Semi-automated Brain Tumor Segmentation by Simulating User Interaction" published in 2020, and "INCIDENTALLY DISCOVERED LEFT ATRIAL THROMBUS WITH SUBSEQUENT EMBOLIC OCCLUSION OF THE ABDOMINAL AORTA" published in 2023.

Frequent coauthors who collaborated with Neal E. Miller included David T. Gering, Aikaterini Kotrotsou, Brett Young-Moxon, Aaron Avery, and Lisa Kohli.

The main fields of study encompassed:

  • Medicine

Subfields of study included:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Research topics covered:

  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Cardiac tumors and thrombi
  • Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Recognition for contributions to science and psychology was reflected in several awards. These included the APA Award for Lifetime Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association in 1991, the William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science (APA) in 1989, and membership in the National Academy of Medicine in 1983.

Additional honors comprised the APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research in 1983, the US President's National Medal of Science awarded in 1964 "for sustained and imaginative research on principles of learning and motivation and illuminating behavioral analysis of the effects of direct electrical stimulation of the brain," as presented by President Johnson at a White House ceremony in 1965.

Earlier recognitions included the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology in 1959, membership in the National Academy of Sciences in 1958, and fellowship in the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1951.

Best Publications

  • Frustration and aggression

    John Dollard;Neal E. Miller;Leonard W. Doob;O. H. Mowrer

  • Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke

    E Taub;N E Miller;T A Novack;E W Cook rd

  • Social learning and imitation

    Neal E. Miller;John Dollard

  • Personality and Psychotherapy

    Rudolph E. Morris;John Dollard;Neal E. Miller

  • Learning of Visceral and Glandular Responses

    Neal E. Miller

  • Studies of fear as an acquirable drive: I. Fear as motivation and fear-reduction as reinforcement in the learning of new responses

    Neal E. Miller

  • Personality and Psychotherapy: An Analysis in Terms of Learning, Thinking, and Culture

    John Dollard;Neal E. Miller

  • An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping.

    Edward Taub;Jean E. Crago;Louis D. Burgio;Thomas E. Groomes

  • Theory and experiment relating psychoanalytic displacement to stimulus-response generalization.

    Neal E. Miller

  • Learning motivated by electrical stimulation of the brain.

    Jose M. R. Delgado;Warren W. Roberts;Neal E. Miller

  • Effects of chronic exposure to stressors on avoidance-escape behavior and on brain norepinephrine.

    Jay M. Weiss;Howard I. Glazer;Larissa A. Pohorecky;John Brick

  • Biofeedback and Visceral Learning

    Neal E. Miller

  • Experiments on Motivation: Studies Combining Psychological, Physiological, and Pharmacological Techniques

    Neal E. Miller

  • CHEMICAL CODING OF BEHAVIOR IN THE BRAIN.

    Neal E. Miller

  • Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of information value and reliability of the stimulus.

    M. David Egger;Neal E. Miller

  • Instrumental learning of heart rate changes in curarized rats: shaping, and specificity to discriminative stimulus.

    Neal E. Miller;Leo Dicara

  • Learning resistance to pain and fear: effects of overlearning, exposure, and rewarded expsure in context.

    Neal E. Miller

  • Effects of drugs on motivation; the value of using a variety of measures.

    Neal E. Miller

  • Rewarding and punishing effects from stimulating the same place in the rat's brain.

    Gordon H. Bower;Neal E. Miller

  • Personality and Psychotherapy. An Analysis in Terms of Learning, Thinking and Culture. New York (McGraw-Hill) 1950.

    John Dollard;N. E. Miller

  • Conflict versus consolidation of memory traces to explain "retrograde amnesia" produced by ECS.

    Edgar E. Coons;Neal E. Miller

  • Some recent studies of conflict behavior and drugs.

    Neal E. Miller

  • Evidence for Higher Functions of the Cerebellum: Eating and Grooming Elicited by Cerebellar Stimulation in Cats

    Gary G. Berntson;Samuel J. Potolicchio;Neal E. Miller

  • Social Learning and Imitation

    Robert H. Gault;Neal E. Miller;John Dollard

  • Frustration and Aggression.@@@Explorations in Personality; A Clinical and Experimental Study of Fifty Men of College Age.

    Kimball Young;John Dollard;N. E. Miller;L. W. Doob

  • Social Learning and Imitation

    Charles Bird;N. E. Miller;J. Dollard

Frequent Co-Authors

Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
David A. Booth
David A. Booth University of Sussex
Carl I. Hovland
Carl I. Hovland Yale University
Edward Taub
Edward Taub University of Alabama at Birmingham
Gary G. Berntson
Gary G. Berntson The Ohio State University
Gordon H. Bower
Gordon H. Bower Stanford University
Joseph D. Matarazzo
Joseph D. Matarazzo Oregon Health & Science University
Edwin G. Boring
Edwin G. Boring Harvard University
Wilbert J. McKeachie
Wilbert J. McKeachie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Herta Flor
Herta Flor Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying psychology in the USA, you may also be interested in related online degrees and the range of career pathways available in the social sciences. Careers such as social work, counseling, or mental health services often require specialized education and specific degrees, depending on your state.

For example, the Oklahoma minimum degree requirement for social workers typically starts with a bachelor’s degree in social work or a related field. For those looking into social worker education requirements in Oregon, candidates often need either a bachelor’s or master’s degree to obtain professional licensure.

Similarly, understanding the social worker degree requirements in Pennsylvania can help guide your studies if you plan on practicing there. Students interested in Rhode Island should research social worker degree requirements in Rhode Island for state-specific licensing pathways.

Exploring online psychology or social work degrees increases your flexibility and gives you access to nationwide education options, paving the way for meaningful careers in diverse community and clinical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Neal E. Miller

Recently Published Articles