World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
25714
World Ranking
5089
National Ranking
2794

Wilbert J. McKeachie publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilbert J. McKeachie sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 187 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Wilbert J. McKeachie D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilbert J. McKeachie sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 1988 - E. L. Thorndike Award, American Psychological Association
  • 1972 - E. F. Lindquist Award, American Educational Research Association
  • 1962 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Wilbert J. McKeachie was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic work primarily centered on the fields of psychology and social sciences, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to understanding human behavior and education.

The main areas of study for Wilbert J. McKeachie included:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

More specific subfields of research involved:

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Their work addressed several key topics within these domains, notably:

  • Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices

Throughout their career, Wilbert J. McKeachie contributed to the advancement of knowledge in educational methods and psychological evaluation, focusing on how communication and teaching innovations impact learning environments.

Their recognition in the academic community is reflected in multiple awards spanning several decades. These include:

  • James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (2009)
  • Fellow of the American Educational Research Association (2008)
  • E. L. Thorndike Award, American Psychological Association (1988)
  • E. F. Lindquist Award, American Educational Research Association (1972)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1962)

Wilbert J. McKeachie's contributions thus span significant recognition from both psychological and educational research organizations, indicating sustained influence and engagement within these professional communities over several decades.

Best Publications

  • McKeachie's teaching tips

    Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)

    Paul R. Pintrich;David A. F. Smith;Teresa Garcia;Wilbert J. Mckeachie

  • Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers

    Robert C. Kleinsasser;Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire

    Teresa Garcia Duncan;Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers

    Wilbert James McKeachie;Marilla Svinivki;David Nicol

  • Student ratings: The validity of use.

    Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • Teaching tips: A guidebook for the beginning college teacher

    Wilbert James McKeachie

  • Test Anxiety: Deficits in Information Processing.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Wilbert J. McKeachie;Yi-guang Lin;Dorothy P. Holinger

  • Teaching Learning Strategies

    Wilbert J. McKeachie;Paul R. Pintrich;Yi-Guang Lin

  • Research on College Teaching: The Historical Background.

    Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning

    Yi-Guang Lin;Wilbert J McKeachie;Yung Che Kim

  • Student Ratings of Faculty: A Reprise.

    Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • Two types of test-anxious students: support for an information processing model

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Wilbert J. McKeachie;Yi-guang Lin

  • Student Ratings of Teacher Effectiveness: Validity Studies

    W. J. McKeachie;Yi-Guang Lin;William Mann

  • Inferring students' cognitive structures and their development using the "ordered tree technique."

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Wilbert J. McKeachie;Yi-guang Lin;David G. Tucker

  • 7: The Evaluation of Teachers in Higher Education

    James A. Kulik;Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • Dimensions of student evaluations of teaching.

    Robert L. Isaacson;Wilbert J. McKeachie;John E. Milholland;Yi G. Lin

  • Student motivation, cognition, and learning : essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie

    Paul R. Pintrich;Donald R. Brown;Claire E. Weinstein;Wilbert James McKeachie

  • Liberal Education, Study in Depth, and the Arts and Sciences Major--Psychology.

    Thomas V. McGovern;Laurel Furumoto;Diane F. Halpern;Gregory A. Kimble

  • The Multisource Nature of Learning: An Introduction

    Asghar Iran-Nejad;Wilbert J. McKeachie;David C. Berliner

Frequent Co-Authors

Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin University of Missouri
Paul R. Pintrich
Paul R. Pintrich University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Diane F. Halpern
Diane F. Halpern Claremont McKenna College
James Hartley
James Hartley Keele University
James A. Kulik
James A. Kulik University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Neal E. Miller
Neal E. Miller Rockefeller University
Charles D. Spielberger
Charles D. Spielberger University of South Florida
Joseph D. Matarazzo
Joseph D. Matarazzo Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens numerous doors in mental health and counseling fields. One rapidly growing area is substance abuse counseling, where professionals guide individuals struggling with addiction towards recovery. For those interested in specializing, understanding local certification requirements is key.

Online psychology degrees often offer flexibility for students aiming to enter this field. After graduation, different cities have specific credentialing processes. You can explore Boise substance abuse counselor certification requirements if you plan to work in Idaho. Meanwhile, those interested in Massachusetts can learn more about what’s needed through how to become a substance abuse counselor in Boston.

In New York, check the Buffalo substance abuse counselor certification requirements, while those looking at Arizona should review Chandler substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Researching these pathways early can help you select the right online degree and ensure you meet state-specific requirements for a successful career in psychology and substance abuse counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Wilbert J. McKeachie

Recently Published Articles