World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5089 2794 187 25714

Wilbert J. McKeachie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wilbert J. McKeachie between 1951 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wilbert J. McKeachie published across 73 years, from 1951 to 2023, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1961. 1 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1951 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1961. 1951: 3 publications 1952: 4 publications 1953: 1 publication 1954: 6 publications 1955: 5 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 1 publication 1958: 4 publications 1959: 2 publications 1960: 8 publications 1961: 9 publications 1962: 2 publications 1963: 3 publications 1964: 2 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 5 publications 1967: 2 publications 1968: 5 publications 1969: 8 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 7 publications 1972: 6 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 7 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1951 2023

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wilbert J. McKeachie: publications per year, 1951 to 2023
Year Publications
1951 3
1952 4
1953 1
1954 6
1955 5
1956 0
1957 1
1958 4
1959 2
1960 8
1961 9
1962 2
1963 3
1964 2
1965 1
1966 5
1967 2
1968 5
1969 8
1970 4
1971 7
1972 6
1973 2
1974 3
1975 4
1976 7
1977 0
1978 4
1979 3
1980 6
1981 3
1982 4
1983 4
1984 5
1985 3
1986 4
1987 8
1988 2
1989 4
1990 7
1991 3
1992 3
1993 2
1994 3
1995 0
1996 0
1997 5
1998 3
1999 2
2000 0
2001 3
2002 1
2003 3
2004 2
2005 1
2006 6
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 3
2011 1
2012 0
2013 0
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
Total 209
Download as CSV

Wilbert J. McKeachie publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilbert J. McKeachie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 187 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 187
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Wilbert J. McKeachie D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilbert J. McKeachie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 1988 - E. L. Thorndike Award, American Psychological Association
  • 1972 - E. F. Lindquist Award, American Educational Research Association
  • 1962 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Wilbert J. McKeachie was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic work primarily centered on the fields of psychology and social sciences, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to understanding human behavior and education.

The main areas of study for Wilbert J. McKeachie included:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

More specific subfields of research involved:

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Their work addressed several key topics within these domains, notably:

  • Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices

Throughout their career, Wilbert J. McKeachie contributed to the advancement of knowledge in educational methods and psychological evaluation, focusing on how communication and teaching innovations impact learning environments.

Their recognition in the academic community is reflected in multiple awards spanning several decades. These include:

  • James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (2009)
  • Fellow of the American Educational Research Association (2008)
  • E. L. Thorndike Award, American Psychological Association (1988)
  • E. F. Lindquist Award, American Educational Research Association (1972)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1962)

Wilbert J. McKeachie's contributions thus span significant recognition from both psychological and educational research organizations, indicating sustained influence and engagement within these professional communities over several decades.

Best Publications

  • McKeachie's teaching tips

    Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)

    Paul R. Pintrich;David A. F. Smith;Teresa Garcia;Wilbert J. Mckeachie

  • Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers

    Robert C. Kleinsasser;Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire

    Teresa Garcia Duncan;Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers

    Wilbert James McKeachie;Marilla Svinivki;David Nicol

  • Student ratings: The validity of use.

    Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • Teaching tips: A guidebook for the beginning college teacher

    Wilbert James McKeachie

  • Test Anxiety: Deficits in Information Processing.

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Wilbert J. McKeachie;Yi-guang Lin;Dorothy P. Holinger

  • Teaching Learning Strategies

    Wilbert J. McKeachie;Paul R. Pintrich;Yi-Guang Lin

  • Research on College Teaching: The Historical Background.

    Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning

    Yi-Guang Lin;Wilbert J McKeachie;Yung Che Kim

  • Student Ratings of Faculty: A Reprise.

    Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • Two types of test-anxious students: support for an information processing model

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Wilbert J. McKeachie;Yi-guang Lin

  • Student Ratings of Teacher Effectiveness: Validity Studies

    W. J. McKeachie;Yi-Guang Lin;William Mann

  • Inferring students' cognitive structures and their development using the "ordered tree technique."

    Moshe Naveh-Benjamin;Wilbert J. McKeachie;Yi-guang Lin;David G. Tucker

  • 7: The Evaluation of Teachers in Higher Education

    James A. Kulik;Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • Dimensions of student evaluations of teaching.

    Robert L. Isaacson;Wilbert J. McKeachie;John E. Milholland;Yi G. Lin

  • Student motivation, cognition, and learning : essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie

    Paul R. Pintrich;Donald R. Brown;Claire E. Weinstein;Wilbert James McKeachie

  • Liberal Education, Study in Depth, and the Arts and Sciences Major--Psychology.

    Thomas V. McGovern;Laurel Furumoto;Diane F. Halpern;Gregory A. Kimble

  • The Multisource Nature of Learning: An Introduction

    Asghar Iran-Nejad;Wilbert J. McKeachie;David C. Berliner

Frequent Co-Authors

Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin University of Missouri
Paul R. Pintrich
Paul R. Pintrich University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Diane F. Halpern
Diane F. Halpern Claremont McKenna College
James Hartley
James Hartley Keele University
James A. Kulik
James A. Kulik University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Neal E. Miller
Neal E. Miller Rockefeller University
Charles D. Spielberger
Charles D. Spielberger University of South Florida
Joseph D. Matarazzo
Joseph D. Matarazzo Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens numerous doors in mental health and counseling fields. One rapidly growing area is substance abuse counseling, where professionals guide individuals struggling with addiction towards recovery. For those interested in specializing, understanding local certification requirements is key.

Online psychology degrees often offer flexibility for students aiming to enter this field. After graduation, different cities have specific credentialing processes. You can explore Boise substance abuse counselor certification requirements if you plan to work in Idaho. Meanwhile, those interested in Massachusetts can learn more about what’s needed through how to become a substance abuse counselor in Boston.

In New York, check the Buffalo substance abuse counselor certification requirements, while those looking at Arizona should review Chandler substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Researching these pathways early can help you select the right online degree and ensure you meet state-specific requirements for a successful career in psychology and substance abuse counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Wilbert J. McKeachie

Recently Published Articles