World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
15205
World Ranking
4873
National Ranking
2313

James A. Kulik publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Kulik sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

James A. Kulik D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Kulik sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Mathematics education
  • Pedagogy
  • Statistics

James A. Kulik focuses on Academic achievement, Mathematics education, Meta-analysis, Computer-Assisted Instruction and Teaching method. His studies deal with areas such as Secondary education and Educational research as well as Academic achievement. His Mathematics education research includes themes of Control, Cognitive psychology and Certainty.

His Control research integrates issues from Construct, Learning theory, Peer feedback and Action. His work in the fields of Computer-based instruction overlaps with other areas such as Computer based, Educational program and Short duration. The Teaching method study combines topics in areas such as Achievement test, Program evaluation and Mastery learning.

His most cited work include:

  • The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events (927 citations)
  • Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings (910 citations)
  • Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. (818 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

James A. Kulik mainly investigates Mathematics education, Academic achievement, Meta-analysis, Pedagogy and Teaching method. His Mathematics education research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Program evaluation and Achievement test. His study in Academic achievement is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Secondary education, Self-concept, Educational technology and Criterion-referenced test.

His work on Instructional technology and Special education as part of general Pedagogy study is frequently linked to Curriculum development, Dissenting opinion and CITES, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. His work on Individualized instruction, Keller Plan and Teaching and learning center as part of general Teaching method research is frequently linked to Working hours and Legislature, bridging the gap between disciplines. In the subject of general Computer-Assisted Instruction, his work in Computer-based instruction and Computer based education is often linked to Computer based, thereby combining diverse domains of study.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Mathematics education (68.97%)
  • Academic achievement (46.55%)
  • Meta-analysis (44.83%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1988-2016)?

  • Mathematics education (68.97%)
  • Meta-analysis (44.83%)
  • Educational research (17.24%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Mathematics education, Meta-analysis, Educational research, Academic achievement and Program evaluation. His work on Teaching method and Computer-based instruction as part of general Mathematics education research is frequently linked to Short duration, Computer aid and Educational program, bridging the gap between disciplines. His Teaching method research incorporates elements of Control, Learning theory, Peer feedback and Action.

Meta-analysis combines with fields such as Research methodology, Secondary education, Social science, Chi-square test and Statistical significance in his investigation. He interconnects Special education and Criterion-referenced test in the investigation of issues within Academic achievement. His Program evaluation research incorporates themes from Research design, Educational technology, Achievement test and Mastery learning.

Between 1988 and 2016, his most popular works were:

  • The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events (927 citations)
  • Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. (818 citations)
  • Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-Analysis (377 citations)

Best Publications

  • The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events

    Robert L. Bangert-Drowns;Chen-Lin C. Kulik;James A. Kulik;MaryTeresa Morgan

  • Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings

    Peter A Cohen;James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik

  • Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis.

    Chen-Lin C. Kulik;James A. Kulik

  • Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik

  • Effectiveness of Computer-based College Teaching: A Meta-analysis of Findings

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik;Peter A. Cohen

  • Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems A Meta-Analytic Review

    James A. Kulik;J. D. Fletcher

  • Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-Analysis

    Chen-Lin C. Kulik;James A. Kulik;Robert L. Bangert-Drowns

  • Effects of Computer-Based Teaching on Secondary School Students.

    James A. Kulik;Robert L. Bangert;George W. Williams

  • Effects of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-analysis of Evaluation Findings

    Chen-Lin C. Kulik;James A. Kulik

  • Meta-analytic Findings on Grouping Programs

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik

  • A Meta-Analysis of Outcome Studies of Keller's Personalized System of Instruction.

    James A. Kulik;Chen-lin C. Kulik;Peter A. Cohen

  • Effects of Frequent Classroom Testing.

    Robert L. Bangert-Drowns;James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik

  • Effectiveness of Computer-Based Education in Secondary Schools.

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik;Robert L. Bangert-Drowns

  • Student Ratings: Validity, Utility, and Controversy

    James A. Kulik

  • Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik;Robert L. Bangert-Drowns

  • Student Ratings of Instruction

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik

  • Effects of Accelerated Instruction on Students

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik

  • Effects of Practice on Aptitude and Achievement Test Scores

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik;Robert L. Bangert

  • 7: The Evaluation of Teachers in Higher Education

    James A. Kulik;Wilbert J. McKeachie

  • Review of recent research literature on computer-based instruction

    James A. Kulik;Chen-Lin C. Kulik

Frequent Co-Authors

Chen-Lin C. Kulik
Chen-Lin C. Kulik University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Wilbert J. McKeachie
Wilbert J. McKeachie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Roger T. Johnson
Roger T. Johnson University of Minnesota
Herbert J. Walberg
Herbert J. Walberg University of Illinois at Chicago
Geoffrey M. Maruyama
Geoffrey M. Maruyama University of Minnesota
Kenneth A. Kavale
Kenneth A. Kavale Regent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens a wide variety of academic and professional routes. Today, more students are choosing flexible options like online bachelor degree programs, which let you balance studies with work or family life. Accelerated formats mean you can enter the workforce sooner, with a solid foundation in critical thinking and communication skills.

For those considering further specialization, advanced degrees such as online master's programs are available in a variety of disciplines, often allowing completion in as little as one year. For careers in psychology, masters programs in psychology can unlock opportunities in counseling, education, and research.

If your goals include leadership or academia, online doctorate of education programs provide accelerated pathways to senior roles. Ultimately, online degrees allow you to tailor your education for personal growth and maximize career flexibility within the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing James A. Kulik

Recently Published Articles