World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Camilla Persson Benbow

Camilla Persson Benbow

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 71 2132 1937 1243 1103 144 23835

Camilla Persson Benbow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Camilla Persson Benbow between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Camilla Persson Benbow published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1983. 1 of the 150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1983. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 11 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 11 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Camilla Persson Benbow: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 2
1981 4
1982 4
1983 11
1984 3
1985 3
1986 5
1987 3
1988 2
1989 1
1990 11
1991 6
1992 6
1993 2
1994 4
1995 9
1996 7
1997 3
1998 7
1999 5
2000 3
2001 5
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 8
2008 3
2009 2
2010 2
2011 0
2012 4
2013 3
2014 1
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 0
2019 2
2020 1
2021 3
2022 1
2023 2
2024 0
2025 1
Total 150
Download as CSV

Camilla Persson Benbow publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Camilla Persson Benbow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 144 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 144
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Camilla Persson Benbow D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Camilla Persson Benbow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 71
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Camilla Persson Benbow is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, particularly within the subfields of experimental and cognitive psychology. Additional areas of study include safety research, applied psychology, social psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

Their work covers several key topics including psychological and temporal perspectives research, cognitive abilities and testing, education, achievement and giftedness, career development and diversity, psychological and educational research studies, creativity in education and neuroscience, and optimism, hope, and well-being.

Camilla Persson Benbow has contributed to multiple publications, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Gifted Child Quarterly
  • Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science

Some of their notable recent papers include:

  • Intellectual Precocity: What Have We Learned Since Terman?, 2020, Gifted Child Quarterly
  • Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study., 2020, Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Composing Meaningful Lives: Exceptional Women and Men at Age 50, 2023, Gifted Child Quarterly
  • Wrecked by Success? Not to Worry, 2022, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • In Their Own Voice: Educational Perspectives From Intellectually Precocious Youth as Adults, 2025, Gifted Child Quarterly

Frequent co-authors of their research include:

  • David Lubinski
  • Brian O. Bernstein
  • Kira O. McCabe
  • Harrison J. Kell
  • Gabriella D. Noreen

Camilla Persson Benbow has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Educational Research Association since 2008 and as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association since 1992.

Best Publications

  • Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance.

    Jonathan Wai;David Lubinski;Camilla P. Benbow

  • Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact?

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics

    Diane F. Halpern;Camilla P. Benbow;David C. Geary;Ruben C. Gur

  • Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes

    Camilla Persson Benbow

  • Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise:

    David Lubinski;Camilla Persson Benbow

  • Importance of Assessing Spatial Ability in Intellectually Talented Young Adolescents: A 20-Year Longitudinal Study.

    Daniel L. Shea;David Lubinski;Camilla P. Benbow

  • Accomplishment in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Its Relation to STEM Educational Dose: A 25-Year Longitudinal Study

    Jonathan Wai;David Lubinski;Camilla P. Benbow;James H. Steiger

  • The Influence of Spatial Ability on Gender Differences in Mathematics College Entrance Test Scores across Diverse Samples.

    M. Beth Casey;Ronald Nuttall;Elizabeth Pezaris;Camilla Persson Benbow

  • Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-Year Follow-Up of the Profoundly Gifted

    David Lubinski;Rose Mary Webb;Martha J. Morelock;Camilla Persson Benbow

  • States of excellence.

    David Lubinski;Camilla Persson Benbow

  • Consequences in High School and College of Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability: A Longitudinal Perspective

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability at Age 13: Their Status 20 Years Later

    Camilla Persson Benbow;David Lubinski;Daniel L. Shea;Hossain Eftekhari-Sanjani

  • Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity

    Camilla Persson Benbow

  • Creativity and Technical Innovation: Spatial Ability’s Unique Role

    Harrison J. Kell;David Lubinski;Camilla P. Benbow;James H. Steiger

  • Contrasting Intellectual Patterns Predict Creativity in the Arts and Sciences Tracking Intellectually Precocious Youth Over 25 Years

    Gregory Park;David Lubinski;Camilla P. Benbow

  • Gender Differences in Abilities and Preferences Among the Gifted: Implications for the Math-Science Pipeline

    David Lubinski;Camilla Persson Benbow

  • INEQUITY IN EQUITY: How "Equity" Can Lead to Inequity for High-Potential Students

    Camilla Persson Benbow;Julian C. Stanley

  • Tracking Exceptional Human Capital Over Two Decades

    David Lubinski;Camilla P. Benbow;Rose Mary Webb;April Bleske-Rechek

  • Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to Age 33 Longitudinal Study.

    Jonathan Wai;David Lubinski;Camilla P. Benbow

Frequent Co-Authors

David Lubinski
David Lubinski Vanderbilt University
Julian C. Stanley
Julian C. Stanley Johns Hopkins University
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Peter McGuffin
Peter McGuffin King's College London
Michael John Owen
Michael John Owen Cardiff University
Thalia C. Eley
Thalia C. Eley King's College London
Lee A. Thompson
Lee A. Thompson Case Western Reserve University
Douglas K. Detterman
Douglas K. Detterman Case Western Reserve University
Ian W. Craig
Ian W. Craig King's College London
Nigel Williams
Nigel Williams Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up diverse online degree options and career pathways. Many accredited universities across the country now offer flexible online programs, making it easier for students to balance education with personal or professional commitments.

When choosing an online degree, it's important to consider program reputation and regional rankings. For example, students in Arizona may refer to the best psychology degree rankings in Phoenix to identify top local options. Similarly, those in North Carolina can check the best psychology degree programs ranking in Raleigh for guidance.

Career outcomes for psychology graduates are equally varied, spanning mental health, counseling, research, human resources, and education. Prospective students in Nevada might review the best psychology program rankings in Reno, while those in the Midwest could explore the top psychology programs in South Dakota to find suitable online or campus-based opportunities.

By researching regional rankings and online options, students can find programs that align with their interests and long-term professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Camilla Persson Benbow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles