World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16183 15226 540 527 405 23356

Robert M. Graham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert M. Graham between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert M. Graham published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2022. 25 of the 458 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2022. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 8 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 6 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 13 publications 1985: 17 publications 1986: 12 publications 1987: 15 publications 1988: 14 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 11 publications
1964 2025

458 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert M. Graham: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 2
1974 1
1975 1
1976 8
1977 5
1978 1
1979 6
1980 8
1981 5
1982 6
1983 7
1984 13
1985 17
1986 12
1987 15
1988 14
1989 8
1990 6
1991 5
1992 4
1993 3
1994 7
1995 8
1996 7
1997 2
1998 5
1999 5
2000 5
2001 5
2002 5
2003 12
2004 10
2005 7
2006 11
2007 10
2008 9
2009 11
2010 7
2011 12
2012 8
2013 7
2014 8
2015 7
2016 17
2017 6
2018 10
2019 12
2020 10
2021 20
2022 22
2023 19
2024 14
2025 11
Total 458
Download as CSV

Robert M. Graham publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Graham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 405 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 405
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert M. Graham D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Graham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert M. Graham is affiliated with the Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a notable emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Additional subfields of study include Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Physiology.

The main topics covered by their work include:

  • Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies
  • Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Among the recent scientific papers attributed to their research are:

  • "Vascular Stiffness in Aging and Disease," 2021, Frontiers in Physiology
  • "Piezo1 is the cardiac mechanosensor that initiates the cardiomyocyte hypertrophic response to pressure overload in adult mice," 2022, Nature Cardiovascular Research
  • "Platelet-derived growth factor-AB improves scar mechanics and vascularity after myocardial infarction," 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • "Genome-wide association meta-analysis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection identifies risk variants and genes related to artery integrity and tissue-mediated coagulation," 2023, Nature Genetics
  • "Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Rejection Surveillance After Cardiac Transplantation," 2022, Circulation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Robert M. Graham include:

  • Siiri E. Iismaa
  • Stephanie Hesselson
  • Eleni Giannoulatou
  • David W.M. Muller
  • Jason C. Kovacic

The most common venues for publication comprise:

  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • Scientific Reports
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE
  • Circulation

Best Publications

  • Transglutaminases: crosslinking enzymes with pleiotropic functions

    Laszlo Lorand;Robert M. Graham

  • Skeletal muscle hypertrophy is mediated by a Ca2+-dependent calcineurin signalling pathway.

    Christopher Semsarian;Ming-Jie Wu;Yue-Kun Ju;Tadeusz Marciniec

  • α1-Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes Molecular Structure, Function, and Signaling

    Robert M. Graham;Dianne M. Perez;John Hwa;John Hwa;Michael T. Piascik

  • Molecular mechanisms of inherited cardiomyopathies.

    Diane Fatkin;Robert M. Graham

  • Solution-phase library screening for the identification of rare clones: isolation of an alpha 1D-adrenergic receptor cDNA.

    Dianne M. Perez;Michael T. Piascik;Robert M. Graham

  • Adult heart transplantation with distant procurement and ex-vivo preservation of donor hearts after circulatory death: a case series

    Kumud Dhital;Arjun Iyer;Arjun Iyer;Mark Connellan;Hong Chee Chew;Hong Chee Chew

  • Transglutaminases and Disease: Lessons From Genetically Engineered Mouse Models and Inherited Disorders

    Siiri E. Iismaa;Bryony M. Mearns;Laszlo Lorand;Robert M. Graham

  • Targeted inactivation of Gh/tissue transglutaminase II.

    Nisha Nanda;Siiri E. Iismaa;W. Andrew Owens;Ahsan Husain

  • Bacterially Derived 400 nm Particles for Encapsulation and Cancer Cell Targeting of Chemotherapeutics

    Jennifer A. MacDiarmid;Nancy B. Mugridge;Jocelyn C. Weiss;Leo Phillips

  • Neuregulin-1/erbB-activation improves cardiac function and survival in models of ischemic, dilated, and viral cardiomyopathy.

    Xifu Liu;Xinhua Gu;Zhaoming Li;Xinyan Li

  • Cardiovascular responses to exercise as functions of absolute and relative work load.

    S. F. Lewis;W. F. Taylor;R. M. Graham;W. A. Pettinger

  • Sequential treatment of drug-resistant tumors with targeted minicells containing siRNA or a cytotoxic drug

    Jennifer A MacDiarmid;Nancy B Amaro-Mugridge;Jocelyn Madrid-Weiss;Ilya Sedliarou

  • A Proliferative Burst during Preadolescence Establishes the Final Cardiomyocyte Number

    Nawazish Naqvi;Ming Li;John W. Calvert;Thor Tejada

  • The structure of rat preproatrial natriuretic factor as defined by a complementary DNA clone

    Christine E. Seidman;Allan D. Duby;Edmund Choi;Robert M. Graham

  • Parenteral administration of recombinant human neuregulin‐1 to patients with stable chronic heart failure produces favourable acute and chronic haemodynamic responses

    Andrew Jabbour;Andrew Jabbour;Christopher S. Hayward;Anne M. Keogh;Anne M. Keogh;Eugene Kotlyar

  • Suppressed anger and blood pressure: the effects of race, sex, social class, obesity, and age.

    Joel E. Dimsdale;Chester Pierce;David Schoenfeld;Anne Brown

  • Constitutive activation of a single effector pathway: evidence for multiple activation states of a G protein-coupled receptor.

    Dianne M. Perez;John Hwa;Robert Gaivin;Manjula Mathur

  • Genomic organization and expression of the human alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor.

    C. S. Ramarao;J. M K Denker;Dianne M Perez;R. J. Gaivin

  • Tetrazole and Carboxylate Groups of Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists Bind to the Same Subsite by Different Mechanisms

    Keita Noda;Yasser Saad;Akio Kinoshita;Thomas P. Boyle

  • Coupling of expressed alpha 1B- and alpha 1D-adrenergic receptor to multiple signaling pathways is both G protein and cell type specific.

    Dianne M Perez;Mary Beth DeYoung;Robert M. Graham

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter S. Macdonald
Peter S. Macdonald Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute
Richard P. Harvey
Richard P. Harvey Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute
Stephen F. Vatner
Stephen F. Vatner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sally L. Dunwoodie
Sally L. Dunwoodie Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute
Boris Martinac
Boris Martinac Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute
Anne Keogh
Anne Keogh University of New South Wales
Dorothy E. Vatner
Dorothy E. Vatner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
William B. Campbell
William B. Campbell Medical College of Wisconsin
Christine E. Seidman
Christine E. Seidman Harvard University
Jonathan G. Seidman
Jonathan G. Seidman Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and specialized pathways. For students interested in blending mental health with nursing, consider the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program options, which allow working professionals to quickly advance and provide much-needed mental health services.

Those with an interest in health leadership roles may find a bachelors in healthcare administration to be a practical starting point. This degree offers a strong foundation in managing healthcare facilities and services, making graduates valuable assets in a rapidly expanding job market.

To further boost credentials, many students explore graduate-level management programs. Consider the cheapest mha programs online for affordable pathways to executive and leadership positions within hospitals and health organizations.

For nurses seeking the highest clinical roles, enrolling in one of the cheapest online bsn to dnp programs enables advancement to nurse practitioner or leadership roles while maintaining the flexibility to work as you study.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Graham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles