World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
8697
World Ranking
9361
National Ranking
4954

Douglas K. Detterman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas K. Detterman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Douglas K. Detterman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas K. Detterman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas K. Detterman is affiliated with Case Western Reserve University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with a specialization in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. The main topics addressed in their work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing.

Their publication record includes contributions to the journal Intelligence, where they have published research addressing cognitive processes.

  • Book Review, 2020, Intelligence

Detterman's work explores experimental approaches to understanding cognitive abilities, contributing to the academic discourse on how cognitive testing is developed and applied.

  • Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Their scholarly output has not been frequently co-authored, suggesting primarily independent contributions in their field.

Best Publications

  • What is Intelligence?: Contemporary Viewpoints on its Nature and Definition

    Douglas K. Detterman;Robert J. Sternberg

  • Scholastic Assessment or g?: The Relationship Between the Scholastic Assessment Test and General Cognitive Ability

    Meredith C. Frey;Douglas K. Detterman

  • Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and Instruction

    Douglas K. Detterman;Robert J. Sternberg

  • Correlations of Mental Tests with Each Other and with Cognitive Variables Are Highest for Low IQ Groups.

    Douglas K. Detterman;Mark H. Daniel

  • The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon.

    Douglas K. Detterman

  • ACT and General Cognitive Ability.

    Katherine A. Koenig;Meredith C. Frey;Douglas K. Detterman

  • Associations Between Cognitive Abilities and Scholastic Achievement: Genetic Overlap but Environmental Differences

    Lee Anne Thompson;Douglas K. Detterman;Robert Plomin

  • A Quantitative Trait Locus Associated With Cognitive Ability in Children

    M.j. Chorney;K. Chorney;N. Seese;M.j. Owen

  • Human Intelligence: Perspectives on Its Theory and Measurement

    Robert J. Sternberg;Douglas K. Detterman

  • Becoming an expert in the musical domain: It takes more than just practice

    Joanne Ruthsatz;Douglas Detterman;William S. Griscom;Britney A. Cirullo

  • ¿Qué es la inteligencia? : enfoque actual de su naturaleza y definición

    Douglas K. Detterman;Robert J. Sternberg

  • Theoretical notions of intelligence and mental retardation.

    Douglas K. Detterman

  • 2D and 3D high resolution gradient echo functional imaging of the brain: venous contributions to signal in motor cortex studies.

    E. M. Haacke;E. M. Haacke;A. Hopkins;S. Lai;P. Buckley

  • Does “g” exist?

    Douglas K. Detterman

  • How and How Much Can Intelligence Be Increased

    Douglas K. Detterman;Robert J. Sternberg

  • DNA markers associated with high versus low IQ: The IQ quantitative trait loci (QTL) project

    Robert Plomin;Gerald E. McClearn;Deborah L. Smith;Sylvia Vignetti

  • The Fagan test of infant intelligence: A technical summary☆

    Joseph F. Fagan;Douglas K. Detterman

  • What does reaction time tell us about intelligence

    Douglas K. Detterman

  • Allelic associations between 100 DNA markers and high versus low IQ

    Robert Plomin;Gerald E. McClearn;Deborah L. Smith;Patricia Skuder

  • What Is So Special about Special Education

    Douglas K. Detterman;Lee Anne Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee A. Thompson
Lee A. Thompson Case Western Reserve University
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Peter McGuffin
Peter McGuffin King's College London
Michael John Owen
Michael John Owen Cardiff University
Stephen A. Petrill
Stephen A. Petrill The Ohio State University
David Lubinski
David Lubinski Vanderbilt University
Camilla Persson Benbow
Camilla Persson Benbow Vanderbilt University
Gerald E. McClearn
Gerald E. McClearn Pennsylvania State University
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg Cornell University
Thalia C. Eley
Thalia C. Eley King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens up diverse online degree options and various career pathways. Many students begin their journey with a bachelor’s or master’s in psychology, social work, or counseling. Online programs offer flexible learning, allowing you to balance your studies with life’s responsibilities while building a strong academic foundation.

For those interested in clinical roles, the path to becoming a licensed therapist involves specific requirements depending on your location. You can learn more about becoming a licensed therapist in Arlington or explore the steps involved in how to become a licensed therapist in Atlanta. Each state has its own set of educational prerequisites, supervised clinical hours, and licensure exams.

Online degrees help pave your way to licensure. If you are considering becoming a licensed therapist in Aurora or want to know more about Austin licensed therapist requirements, thorough preparation and accreditation are key. Understanding these requirements early will help you make informed decisions about your education and future career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas K. Detterman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles