World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14515 13668 7341 6795 447 29366

E. Mark Haacke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by E. Mark Haacke between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. E. Mark Haacke published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2014. 31 of the 468 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2014. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 29 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 39 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 9 publications
1978 2025

468 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
E. Mark Haacke: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 6
1988 2
1989 1
1990 4
1991 2
1992 3
1993 5
1994 5
1995 5
1996 14
1997 9
1998 10
1999 8
2000 7
2001 7
2002 5
2003 2
2004 6
2005 6
2006 5
2007 10
2008 8
2009 19
2010 15
2011 29
2012 22
2013 16
2014 39
2015 29
2016 16
2017 13
2018 14
2019 14
2020 24
2021 26
2022 18
2023 7
2024 22
2025 9
Total 468
Download as CSV

E. Mark Haacke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Mark Haacke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 447 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 447
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

E. Mark Haacke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Mark Haacke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

E. Mark Haacke is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medical research, focusing on advanced imaging techniques related to neurological and radiological studies. Their main area of study is Medicine, with a substantial number of publications specifically in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Neurology.

Their research spans a variety of main topics, including:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Haacke's frequent collaboration with other researchers includes working with coauthors such as Naying He, Yongsheng Chen, Fuhua Yan, Sagar Buch, and Zhijia Jin.

The scientist has published numerous papers across respected venues, contributing to the knowledge base in medical imaging and neurological research. Notable recent papers include:

  • Susceptibility-weighted Imaging: Technical Essentials and Clinical Neurologic Applications, 2021, Radiology
  • Imaging iron and neuromelanin simultaneously using a single 3D gradient echo magnetization transfer sequence: Combining neuromelanin, iron and the nigrosome-1 sign as complementary imaging biomarkers in early stage Parkinson's disease, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Iron Content in Deep Gray Matter as a Function of Age Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: A Multicenter Study, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Application of Neuromelanin MR Imaging in Parkinson Disease, 2022, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Vascular, flow and perfusion abnormalities in Parkinson's disease, 2020, Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • European Radiology
  • NeuroImage
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI).

    E. Mark Haacke;Yingbiao Xu;Yu Chung N Cheng;Jürgen R. Reichenbach

  • Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1.

    E.M. Haacke;S. Mittal;Z. Wu;J. Neelavalli

  • Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging.

    E. Mark Haacke;Norman Y.C. Cheng;Michael J. House;Qiang Liu

  • Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2.

    S. Mittal;Z. Wu;J. Neelavalli;E.M. Haacke

  • Principles, Techniques, and Applications of T2*-based MR Imaging and Its Special Applications

    Govind B. Chavhan;Paul S. Babyn;Bejoy Thomas;Manohar M. Shroff

  • Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility‐weighted imaging

    Vivek Sehgal;Zachary Delproposto;E. Mark Haacke;E. Mark Haacke;Karen A. Tong

  • Small vessels in the human brain : MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent

    J R Reichenbach;R Venkatesan;D J Schillinger;D K Kido

  • Hemorrhagic Shearing Lesions in Children and Adolescents with Posttraumatic Diffuse Axonal Injury: Improved Detection and Initial Results

    Karen A. Tong;Stephen Ashwal;Barbara A. Holshouser;Lori A. Shutter

  • Diffuse axonal injury in children: clinical correlation with hemorrhagic lesions.

    Karen A. Tong;Stephen Ashwal;Barbara A. Holshouser;Joshua P. Nickerson

  • Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging

    E. Mark Haacke;Malek Makki;Yulin Ge;Megha Maheshwari

  • Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation

    E.M. Haacke;J. Tang;J. Neelavalli;Y.C.N. Cheng

  • Susceptibility-weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses.

    Vivek Sehgal;Zachary Delproposto;Djamel Haddar;E. Mark Haacke;E. Mark Haacke

  • Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs. abnormal iron content in the brain.

    E. Mark Haacke;Muhammad Ayaz;Asadullah Khan;Elena S. Manova

  • Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient‐echo imaging

    Jürgen R. Reichenbach;Ramesh Venkatesan;Dmitriy A. Yablonskiy;Michael R. Thompson

  • Correlation of hypointensities in susceptibility-weighted images to tissue histology in dementia patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a postmortem MRI study

    Matthew Schrag;Grant McAuley;Justine Pomakian;Arshad Jiffry

  • High-resolution BOLD venographic imaging: a window into brain function.

    Jürgen R. Reichenbach;E. Mark Haacke

  • Identification of calcification with MRI using susceptibility‐weighted imaging: A case study

    Zhen Wu;Sandeep Mittal;Karl Kish;Yingjian Yu

  • Global White Matter Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Images Is Predictive of Injury Severity in Traumatic Brain Injury

    Randall R. Benson;Shashwath A. Meda;Sriram Vasudevan;Zhifeng Kou

  • In vivo measurement of blood oxygen saturation using magnetic resonance imaging: a direct validation of the blood oxygen level-dependent concept in functional brain imaging.

    E. Mark Haacke;Song Lai;Jürgen R. Reichenbach;Karthikeyan Kuppusamy

  • Quantifying brain iron deposition in patients with Parkinson's disease using quantitative susceptibility mapping, R2 and R2.

    Jeam Haroldo Oliveira Barbosa;Antonio Carlos Santos;Vitor Tumas;Manju Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Jürgen R. Reichenbach
Jürgen R. Reichenbach Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Weili Lin
Weili Lin University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sonia S. Hassan
Sonia S. Hassan Wayne State University
Lami Yeo
Lami Yeo National Institutes of Health
Zhi-Pei Liang
Zhi-Pei Liang University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Naftali Raz
Naftali Raz Stony Brook University
Roberto Romero
Roberto Romero National Institutes of Health
Robert Zivadinov
Robert Zivadinov University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Moriah E. Thomason
Moriah E. Thomason New York University
Tim A. Ahles
Tim A. Ahles Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Whether you’re starting your journey to become a doctor or exploring alternative careers in healthcare, there are numerous flexible online programs worth considering. Many students interested in medicine pursue advanced nursing or healthcare administration degrees online for their affordability, speed, and career advancement potential.

For aspiring nurse practitioners, one option is enrolling in the fastest pmhnp program to become a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. These programs offer a focused path for those ready to enter the mental health field quickly.

If managing healthcare facilities interests you, consider a cheapest online healthcare administration degree or a cheapest online mha (Master of Healthcare Administration) to gain crucial leadership skills without overwhelming student debt.

For nurses looking to advance to the top of the field, msn to dnp programs online provide a direct and cost-effective route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

These related online degrees open new career pathways beyond medical school and offer flexible options for a wide range of healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing E. Mark Haacke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles