World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
29366
World Ranking
14516
National Ranking
7342

E. Mark Haacke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Mark Haacke sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 447 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

E. Mark Haacke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Mark Haacke sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

E. Mark Haacke is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medical research, focusing on advanced imaging techniques related to neurological and radiological studies. Their main area of study is Medicine, with a substantial number of publications specifically in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Neurology.

Their research spans a variety of main topics, including:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Haacke's frequent collaboration with other researchers includes working with coauthors such as Naying He, Yongsheng Chen, Fuhua Yan, Sagar Buch, and Zhijia Jin.

The scientist has published numerous papers across respected venues, contributing to the knowledge base in medical imaging and neurological research. Notable recent papers include:

  • Susceptibility-weighted Imaging: Technical Essentials and Clinical Neurologic Applications, 2021, Radiology
  • Imaging iron and neuromelanin simultaneously using a single 3D gradient echo magnetization transfer sequence: Combining neuromelanin, iron and the nigrosome-1 sign as complementary imaging biomarkers in early stage Parkinson's disease, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Iron Content in Deep Gray Matter as a Function of Age Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: A Multicenter Study, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Application of Neuromelanin MR Imaging in Parkinson Disease, 2022, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Vascular, flow and perfusion abnormalities in Parkinson's disease, 2020, Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • European Radiology
  • NeuroImage
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI).

    E. Mark Haacke;Yingbiao Xu;Yu Chung N Cheng;Jürgen R. Reichenbach

  • Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1.

    E.M. Haacke;S. Mittal;Z. Wu;J. Neelavalli

  • Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging.

    E. Mark Haacke;Norman Y.C. Cheng;Michael J. House;Qiang Liu

  • Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2.

    S. Mittal;Z. Wu;J. Neelavalli;E.M. Haacke

  • Principles, Techniques, and Applications of T2*-based MR Imaging and Its Special Applications

    Govind B. Chavhan;Paul S. Babyn;Bejoy Thomas;Manohar M. Shroff

  • Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility‐weighted imaging

    Vivek Sehgal;Zachary Delproposto;E. Mark Haacke;E. Mark Haacke;Karen A. Tong

  • Small vessels in the human brain : MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent

    J R Reichenbach;R Venkatesan;D J Schillinger;D K Kido

  • Hemorrhagic Shearing Lesions in Children and Adolescents with Posttraumatic Diffuse Axonal Injury: Improved Detection and Initial Results

    Karen A. Tong;Stephen Ashwal;Barbara A. Holshouser;Lori A. Shutter

  • Diffuse axonal injury in children: clinical correlation with hemorrhagic lesions.

    Karen A. Tong;Stephen Ashwal;Barbara A. Holshouser;Joshua P. Nickerson

  • Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging

    E. Mark Haacke;Malek Makki;Yulin Ge;Megha Maheshwari

  • Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation

    E.M. Haacke;J. Tang;J. Neelavalli;Y.C.N. Cheng

  • Susceptibility-weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses.

    Vivek Sehgal;Zachary Delproposto;Djamel Haddar;E. Mark Haacke;E. Mark Haacke

  • Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs. abnormal iron content in the brain.

    E. Mark Haacke;Muhammad Ayaz;Asadullah Khan;Elena S. Manova

  • Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient‐echo imaging

    Jürgen R. Reichenbach;Ramesh Venkatesan;Dmitriy A. Yablonskiy;Michael R. Thompson

  • Correlation of hypointensities in susceptibility-weighted images to tissue histology in dementia patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a postmortem MRI study

    Matthew Schrag;Grant McAuley;Justine Pomakian;Arshad Jiffry

  • High-resolution BOLD venographic imaging: a window into brain function.

    Jürgen R. Reichenbach;E. Mark Haacke

  • Identification of calcification with MRI using susceptibility‐weighted imaging: A case study

    Zhen Wu;Sandeep Mittal;Karl Kish;Yingjian Yu

  • Global White Matter Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Images Is Predictive of Injury Severity in Traumatic Brain Injury

    Randall R. Benson;Shashwath A. Meda;Sriram Vasudevan;Zhifeng Kou

  • In vivo measurement of blood oxygen saturation using magnetic resonance imaging: a direct validation of the blood oxygen level-dependent concept in functional brain imaging.

    E. Mark Haacke;Song Lai;Jürgen R. Reichenbach;Karthikeyan Kuppusamy

  • Quantifying brain iron deposition in patients with Parkinson's disease using quantitative susceptibility mapping, R2 and R2.

    Jeam Haroldo Oliveira Barbosa;Antonio Carlos Santos;Vitor Tumas;Manju Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Jürgen R. Reichenbach
Jürgen R. Reichenbach Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Weili Lin
Weili Lin University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sonia S. Hassan
Sonia S. Hassan Wayne State University
Lami Yeo
Lami Yeo National Institutes of Health
Zhi-Pei Liang
Zhi-Pei Liang University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Naftali Raz
Naftali Raz Stony Brook University
Roberto Romero
Roberto Romero National Institutes of Health
Robert Zivadinov
Robert Zivadinov University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Moriah E. Thomason
Moriah E. Thomason New York University
Tim A. Ahles
Tim A. Ahles Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Whether you’re starting your journey to become a doctor or exploring alternative careers in healthcare, there are numerous flexible online programs worth considering. Many students interested in medicine pursue advanced nursing or healthcare administration degrees online for their affordability, speed, and career advancement potential.

For aspiring nurse practitioners, one option is enrolling in the fastest pmhnp program to become a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. These programs offer a focused path for those ready to enter the mental health field quickly.

If managing healthcare facilities interests you, consider a cheapest online healthcare administration degree or a cheapest online mha (Master of Healthcare Administration) to gain crucial leadership skills without overwhelming student debt.

For nurses looking to advance to the top of the field, msn to dnp programs online provide a direct and cost-effective route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

These related online degrees open new career pathways beyond medical school and offer flexible options for a wide range of healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing E. Mark Haacke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles