World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
17998
World Ranking
4123
National Ranking
2307

Jonathan A. Plucker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan A. Plucker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 239 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonathan A. Plucker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan A. Plucker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Jonathan A. Plucker is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on psychology and social sciences with a notable emphasis on education and cognitive development.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these broader categories, Plucker's work is concentrated in the following subfields:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Their research topics cover a range of educational and psychological areas such as:

  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • School Choice and Performance
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities

Jonathan A. Plucker has published articles in multiple academic venues with repeated contributions to:

  • Gifted Child Today
  • Phi Delta Kappan
  • Gifted Child Quarterly
  • Journal for the Education of the Gifted
  • AERA Open

Selected recent publications illustrate the focus of their work and include:

  • Replication is important for educational psychology: Recent developments and key issues, 2021, Educational Psychologist
  • The evidence base for advanced learning programs, 2020, Phi Delta Kappan

Frequent collaborators contributing alongside Plucker include:

  • Melanie S. Meyer
  • Matthew C. Makel
  • Scott J. Peters
  • Julia Link Roberts
  • Carolyn M. Callahan

Recognition for their work includes several fellowships:

  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), 2009
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2011
  • Fellow of the American Educational Research Association, 2017

Best Publications

  • Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research.

    Jonathan A. Plucker;Ronald A. Beghetto;Gayle T. Dow

  • Psychometric Approaches to the Study of Human Creativity

    Jonathan A. Plucker;Joseph S. Renzulli

  • Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?

    Matthew C. Makel;Jonathan A. Plucker;Boyd Hegarty

  • Essentials of Creativity Assessment

    James C. Kaufman;Jonathan A. Plucker;John Baer

  • Smart People or Smart Contexts? Cognition, Ability, and Talent Development in an Age of Situated Approaches to Knowing and Learning

    Sasha A. Barab;Jonathan A. Plucker

  • Facts Are More Important Than Novelty Replication in the Education Sciences

    Matthew C. Makel;Jonathan A. Plucker

  • Assessment of Creativity

    Jonathan A. Plucker;Matthew C. Makel

  • Why Creativity Is Domain General, Why It Looks Domain Specific, and Why the Distinction Does Not Matter.

    Jonathan A. Plucker;Ronald A. Beghetto

  • Is the Proof in the Pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958 to Present) Longitudinal Data

    Jonathan A. Plucker

  • Development and Psychometric Integrity of a Measure of Ideational Behavior

    Mark A. Runco;Jonathan A. Plucker;Woong Lim

  • Beware of Simple Conclusions: The Case for Content Generality of Creativity

    Jonathan A. Plucker

  • Advancing Creativity Theory and Research: A Socio‐cultural Manifesto

    Vlad Petre Glaveanu;Michael Hanchett Hanson;John Baer;Baptiste Barbot

  • Mind the (Other) Gap! The Growing Excellence Gap in K-12 Education.

    Jonathan A. Plucker;Nathan Burroughs;Ruiting Song

  • Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education Status of the Field and Considerations for the Future

    Jonathan A. Plucker;Carolyn M. Callahan

  • The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment

    Jonathan A. Plucker;Mark A. Runco

  • Assessment of Creativity

    Unknown

  • Preparation versus practice: How do teacher education programs and practicing teachers align in their use of technology to support teaching and learning?

    Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich;Thomas A. Brush;Jesse Strycker;Susie Gronseth

  • Looking outside and inside: Self-Concept Development of Gifted Adolescents:

    Jonathan A. Plucker;Vicki B. Stocking

  • Identifying and Assessing Creativity as a Component of Giftedness

    James C. Kaufman;Jonathan A. Plucker;Christina M. Russell

  • We Recruit Them, But Then What? The Educational and Psychological Experiences of Academically Talented Undergraduates

    Anne N. Rinn;Jonathan A. Plucker

  • The Relationship Between School Climate Conditions and Student Aspirations

    Jonathan A. Plucker

  • Critical Issues and Practices in Gifted Education: What the Research Says.

    Jonathan A. Plucker;Carolyn M. Callahan

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew C. Makel
Matthew C. Makel University of Calgary
Carolyn M. Callahan
Carolyn M. Callahan University of Virginia
James C. Kaufman
James C. Kaufman University of Connecticut
Ronald A. Beghetto
Ronald A. Beghetto Arizona State University
Mark A. Runco
Mark A. Runco Southern Oregon University
John Baer
John Baer Rider University
D. Betsy McCoach
D. Betsy McCoach University of Connecticut
Dean Keith Simonton
Dean Keith Simonton University of California, Davis
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg Cornell University
Giovanni Emanuele Corazza
Giovanni Emanuele Corazza University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning an online psychology degree opens doors to several rewarding careers, particularly in the field of substance abuse counseling. Each state and city may have unique educational pathways and certification standards for professionals entering this sector.

To illustrate, aspiring counselors can find distinct requirements for Fremont substance abuse counselors education requirements. Similarly, learning about the Fresno substance abuse counselor certification requirements can help you plan your academic route if you wish to work in California.

Looking beyond California, guides on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Garland and how to become a substance abuse counselor in Gilbert explain the steps required in other regions. Reviewing these pathways can help prospective students select the best online degree or certification program based on their preferred location and career goals.

No matter where you plan to practice, understanding local qualifications is essential for building a successful career in substance abuse counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan A. Plucker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles