World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 43 1379 1290 585 533 105 28741

John Hulland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Hulland between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Hulland published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2019. 8 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2019. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
1989 2025

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Hulland: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 2
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 3
1996 3
1997 0
1998 1
1999 3
2000 1
2001 3
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 3
2008 4
2009 3
2010 6
2011 1
2012 4
2013 4
2014 4
2015 2
2016 7
2017 7
2018 6
2019 11
2020 7
2021 5
2022 3
2023 1
2024 4
2025 4
Total 114
Download as CSV

John Hulland publications per year - data summary

  • John Hulland, a Business and Management scholar from University of Georgia, has 114 publications recorded across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1989 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 11 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1989, 1992, 1994, 1998 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 37 years in the span carry no publications at all (1991 and 1997).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.3 per year counting only the 35 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 17 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1989-2001: 21 publications (1.6 per year); 2002-2014: 36 publications (2.8 per year); 2015-2025: 57 publications (5.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

John Hulland publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Hulland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 105–109 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 105 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113 105
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

John Hulland publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • John Hulland, a Business and Management scholar from University of Georgia, records 105 publications - the 31st percentile of the discipline.
  • 31% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than John Hulland, and about 69% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and John Hulland ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

John Hulland D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Hulland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69 43
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

John Hulland D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • John Hulland, a Business and Management scholar from University of Georgia, records 43 D-Index - the 55th percentile of the discipline.
  • 55% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than John Hulland, and about 45% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and John Hulland ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

John Hulland is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of social sciences, with a particular focus on business, management, and accounting. Their research spans multiple subfields, including sociology and political science, marketing, clinical psychology, information systems and management, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

Their work addresses several main topics, highlighting a diversity of interests within marketing and consumer behavior. These topics include:

  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

Hulland's publication record shows a concentration in a number of leading academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • International Journal of Research in Marketing
  • International Marketing Review
  • AMS Review
  • Communication & Sport

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Hulland demonstrate engagement with both theoretical and applied topics within marketing and management. Notable papers include:

  • "Why systematic review papers and meta-analyses matter: an introduction to the special issue on generalizations in marketing," 2020, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • "Conceptual review papers: revisiting existing research to develop and refine theory," 2020, AMS Review
  • "The importance of behavioral outcomes," 2021, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Hulland frequently collaborates with a select group of co-authors. The most prominent among these collaborators are:

  • Mark B. Houston
  • Keith Marion Smith
  • Kevin L. Sample
  • Roman Welden
  • Michael Haenlein

Best Publications

  • Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies

    John Hulland

  • Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research

    Michael Wade;John Hulland

  • Managing An Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and Flows

    Nick Bontis;Mary M. Crossan;John Hulland

  • A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations

    D. Sandy Staples;John S. Hulland;Christopher A. Higgins

  • Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles

    John Hulland;Hans Baumgartner;Keith Marion Smith

  • Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of Automated Social Presence in Organizational Frontlines and Customers’ Service Experiences

    Jenny van Doorn;Martin Mende;Stephanie M. Noble;John Hulland

  • Redeployment of Brands, Sales Forces, and General Marketing Management Expertise following Horizontal Acquisitions: A Resource-Based View:

    Laurence Capron;John Hulland

  • Review articles: purpose, process, and structure

    Robert W. Palmatier;Mark B. Houston;John Hulland

  • Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions--Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System

    Christopher R. Plouffe;John S. Hulland;Mark Vandenbosch

  • Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy

    Julian Birkinshaw;Allen Morrison;John Hulland

  • Use of causal models in marketing research: A review

    John Hulland;Yiu Ho Chow;Shunyin Lam

  • The future of technology and marketing: a multidisciplinary perspective

    Dhruv Grewal;John Hulland;Praveen K. Kopalle;Elena Karahanna

  • Resource attributes and firm performance in international joint ventures

    R. Azimah Ainuddin;Paul W. Beamish;John S. Hulland;Michael J. Rouse

  • A short form of the Maximization Scale: Factor structure, reliability and validity studies.

    Gergana Y. Nenkov;Maureen Morrin;Andrew Ward;Barry Schwartz

  • Managing An Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and Flows

    Nick Bontis;John Hulland;Mary M. Crossan

  • Intermediating Technologies and Multi-Group Adoption: A Comparison of Consumer and Merchant Adoption Intentions toward a New Electronic Payment System

    Christopher R. Plouffe;Mark Vandenbosch;John Hulland

  • Why systematic review papers and meta-analyses matter: an introduction to the special issue on generalizations in marketing

    John Hulland;Mark B. Houston

  • Considering the Future: The Conceptualization and Measurement of Elaboration on Potential Outcomes

    Gergana Y. Nenkov;J. Jeffrey Inman;John Hulland

  • Value Creation Following Merger and Acquisition Announcements: The Role of Strategic Emphasis Alignment

    Vanitha Swaminathan;Feisal Murshed;John Hulland

  • A Short Form of the Maximization Scale: Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity Studies

    Gergana Y. Nenkov;Maureen Morrin;Barry Schwartz;Andrew Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Jeffrey Inman
J. Jeffrey Inman University of Pittsburgh
Mark B. Houston
Mark B. Houston Texas Christian University
Barry Schwartz
Barry Schwartz Swarthmore College
John E. Prescott
John E. Prescott University of Pittsburgh
Dhruv Grewal
Dhruv Grewal Babson College
Nick Bontis
Nick Bontis McMaster University
Mary M. Crossan
Mary M. Crossan University of Western Ontario
Elena Karahanna
Elena Karahanna University of Georgia
Christopher A. Higgins
Christopher A. Higgins University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Business and Management in the USA opens doors to a range of related degrees that can boost your skills and career prospects. Many students now prefer flexible, online learning for these programs, as it enables them to balance work, study, and family life.

If you are interested in fields combining leadership and technical expertise, a construction management degree cost analysis can help you find accessible programs that prepare graduates for rapidly growing roles in project management and infrastructure development.

For experienced professionals aiming to advance or pivot in their careers, applying to one of the top online executive mba programs offers excellent exposure to global business practices and leadership opportunities—often at a fraction of the cost of on-campus courses.

Budget is a leading concern, but there are many affordable online masters programs available in business, technology, and more, allowing for career growth without overextending financially.

Data-driven decision-making is another key trend. If you want to stand out, consider an online master's data science to gain analytical skills highly valued by modern organizations.

Best Scientists Citing John Hulland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles