World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
6382
World Ranking
9159
National Ranking
535

Alishia D. Williams publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alishia D. Williams sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alishia D. Williams D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alishia D. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alishia D. Williams is primarily affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research interests are situated at the intersection of psychology and medicine, with a focus on mental health and digital interventions.

Their work spans several main fields of study:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these areas, Williams has contributed to multiple subfields, including:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Sociology and Political Science

Their research covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Williams has authored or contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data, 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Psychological factors for the onset of depression: a meta-analysis of prospective studies, 2021, BMJ Open
  • Preventive Cognitive Therapy With Antidepressant Discontinuation During Pregnancy, 2020, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
  • Personalized cognitive training: Protocol for individual-level meta-analysis implementing machine learning methods, 2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Christopher G. Beevers
  • Per Carlbring
  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Marlies E. Brouwer
  • Claudi Bockting

The venues in which Williams frequently publishes are:

  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • BMJ Open
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research

Overall, Alishia D. Williams's scientific contributions provide insight into cognitive behavioral therapies, mental health treatment customization, and the implementation of technology-driven interventions, particularly in relation to depression, pregnancy-related mental health, and adolescent development.

Best Publications

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Orestis Efthimiou;Orestis Efthimiou;Clara Miguel;Clara Miguel;Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl

  • CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer

    Sarah Watts;Anna Mackenzie;Cherian Thomas;Al Griskaitis

  • Prospective biomarkers of major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Mitzy Kennis;Lotte Gerritsen;Marije van Dalen;Alishia Williams;Alishia Williams

  • Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;David Daniel Ebert;Liesje Donkin;Heleen Riper

  • Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data.

    Toshi A. Furukawa;Aya Suganuma;Edoardo G. Ostinelli;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • Deficits in emotion regulation associated with pathological gambling

    Alishia D. Williams;Jessica R. Grisham;Alicia Erskine;Eva Cassedy

  • Categorization and cognitive deficits in compulsive hoarding.

    Jessica R. Grisham;Melissa M. Norberg;Alishia D. Williams;Sarah P. Certoma

  • Combining Imagination and Reason in the Treatment of Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Internet-Based Cognitive-Bias Modification and Internet-CBT for Depression

    Alishia D. Williams;Simon E. Blackwell;Anna Mackenzie;Emily A. Holmes

  • Cognitive avoidance of intrusive memories: Recall vantage perspective and associations with depression

    Alishia D. Williams;Michelle L. Moulds

  • Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for mixed anxiety and depression: a randomized controlled trial and evidence of effectiveness in primary care.

    J. M. Newby;A. Mackenzie;A. D. Williams;K. McIntyre

  • The Effectiveness of Internet Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) for Depression in Primary Care: A Quality Assurance Study

    Alishia D Williams;Gavin Andrews;Gavin Andrews

  • Impulsivity, Emotion Regulation, and Mindful Attentional Focus in Compulsive Buying

    Alishia D. Williams;Alishia D. Williams;Jessica R. Grisham

  • An investigation of the cognitive and experiential features of intrusive memories in depression.

    Alishia D Williams;Michelle L Moulds

  • Internet Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Kathleen A O'moore;Jill M Newby;Gavin Andrews;David J Hunter

  • Effectiveness of transdiagnostic Internet cognitive behavioural treatment for mixed anxiety and depression in primary care.

    Jill M. Newby;Louise Mewton;Alishia D. Williams;Gavin Andrews

  • Positive imagery cognitive bias modification (CBM) and internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT): a randomized controlled trial.

    Alishia D. Williams;Alishia D. Williams;Kathleen O’Moore;Simon E. Blackwell;Jessica Smith

  • The impact of psychological distress tolerance in the treatment of depression

    Alishia D. Williams;Jessica Thompson;Gavin Andrews;Gavin Andrews

  • Up-scaling clinician assisted internet cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) for depression: A model for dissemination into primary care.

    Gavin Andrews;Alishia D Williams

  • An Investigation of the Relationship Between Cognitive Reactivity and Rumination

    Michelle L. Moulds;Eva Kandris;Alishia D. Williams;Tamara Lang

  • Reductions in negative repetitive thinking and metacognitive beliefs during transdiagnostic internet cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) for mixed anxiety and depression.

    Jill M. Newby;Alishia D. Williams;Gavin Andrews

Frequent Co-Authors

Gavin Andrews
Gavin Andrews University of New South Wales
Jessica R. Grisham
Jessica R. Grisham University of New South Wales
Michelle L. Moulds
Michelle L. Moulds University of New South Wales
Jill M. Newby
Jill M. Newby University of New South Wales
Claudi L H Bockting
Claudi L H Bockting University of Amsterdam
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Viktor Kaldo
Viktor Kaldo Karolinska Institute
Eirini Karyotaki
Eirini Karyotaki Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Huibert Burger
Huibert Burger University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology often leads students to consider adjacent fields such as counseling, therapy, and mental health services. With the growing demand for skilled professionals, online and hybrid counseling degrees have become increasingly popular and accessible — especially for those seeking flexibility in their studies.

Cost plays a vital role when choosing where to enroll. For those focused on affordability, many institutions highlight the affordable counseling degrees in New York as well as the cheapest counseling programs in Ohio. Additionally, students in Pennsylvania can benefit from information on the most affordable counseling degree programs in Pennsylvania and the cheapest counseling degrees in Philadelphia.

Completing an accredited online counseling or psychology degree can pave the way for diverse careers in mental health, private practice, education, and social services. By considering factors such as tuition, program flexibility, and state licensure requirements, students can confidently take their next steps toward a rewarding and impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Alishia D. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles