World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
20580
World Ranking
2349
National Ranking
111

Nickolai Titov publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nickolai Titov sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 265 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nickolai Titov D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nickolai Titov sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nickolai Titov is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia and is an active researcher primarily in the field of Psychology, with a strong emphasis on applied and clinical psychology subfields. Their scholarly work addresses various aspects of mental health treatment and the impact of digital technologies on psychological well-being.

The researcher has contributed extensively to the domains of Digital Mental Health Interventions, Mental Health Treatment and Access, and broader Mental Health Research Topics. Additional focal areas in their research encompass the Impact of Technology on Adolescents, Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation.

Nickolai Titov's frequent publication venues include:

  • Internet Interventions
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Journal of Pain
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Among recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Titov are:

  • User characteristics and outcomes from a national digital mental health service: an observational study of registrants of the Australian MindSpot Clinic, 2020, The Lancet Digital Health
  • Rapid report: Early demand, profiles and concerns of mental health users during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020, Internet Interventions
  • Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment, 2021, Psychiatric Services
  • Consensus statement on the problem of terminology in psychological interventions using the internet or digital components, 2020, Internet Interventions

Their frequent co-authors include Blake F. Dear, Eyal Karin, Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos, Lauren Staples, and Madelyne A. Bisby, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts in their research domain.

Best Publications

  • Computer Therapy for the Anxiety and Depressive Disorders Is Effective, Acceptable and Practical Health Care: A Meta-Analysis

    Gavin Andrews;Pim Cuijpers;Michelle G. Craske;Peter McEvoy

  • Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders

    Gerhard Andersson;Nickolai Titov

  • Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation

    Gerhard Andersson;Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Alexander Rozental

  • Internet treatment for depression: a randomized controlled trial comparing clinician vs. technician assistance.

    Nickolai Titov;Gavin Andrews;Matthew Davies;Karen McIntyre

  • Psychometric Comparison of the PHQ-9 and BDI-II for Measuring Response during Treatment of Depression

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F Dear;Dean McMillan;Tracy Anderson

  • Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions

    Alexander Rozental;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson;Johanna Boettcher;David Daniel Ebert

  • Transdiagnostic internet treatment for anxiety and depression: A randomised controlled trial

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Genevieve Schwencke;Gavin Andrews

  • Psychometric properties and clinical utility of brief measures of depression, anxiety, and general distress: The PHQ-2, GAD-2, and K-6

    Lauren G. Staples;Blake F. Dear;Milena Gandy;Vincent Fogliati

  • Improving Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Self-Guided Internet Treatment for Anxiety and Depression: Randomised Controlled Trial

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Luke Johnston;Carolyn Lorian

  • Internet Interventions for Adults with Anxiety and Mood Disorders: A Narrative Umbrella Review of Recent Meta-Analyses.

    Gerhard Andersson;Per Carlbring;Nickolai Titov;Nils Lindefors

  • Internet Treatment for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinician vs. Technician Assistance

    Emma Robinson;Nickolai Titov;Gavin Andrews;Karen McIntyre

  • Clinician-assisted Internet-based treatment is effective for panic: A randomized controlled trial.

    Edward Wims;Nickolai Titov;Gavin Andrews;Isabella Choi

  • Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;David Daniel Ebert;Liesje Donkin;Heleen Riper

  • Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Anne Etzelmueller;Christiaan Vis;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Harald Baumeister

  • ICBT in routine care: A descriptive analysis of successful clinics in five countries.

    Nickolai Titov;Blake Dear;Olav Nielssen;Lauren Staples

  • Psychometric Comparison of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Measuring Response during Treatment of Generalised Anxiety Disorder

    Blake F Dear;Nickolai Titov;Matthew Sunderland;Dean McMillan

  • Shyness 3: Randomized Controlled Trial of Guided Versus Unguided Internet-Based CBT for Social Phobia

    Nickolai Titov;Gavin Andrews;Isabella Choi;Genevieve Schwencke

  • Transdiagnostic Internet treatment for anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial.

    Nickolai Titov;Gavin Andrews;Luke Johnston;Emma Robinson

  • Clinician-Assisted Internet-Based Treatment is Effective for Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Unknown

  • Acceptability of Internet treatment of anxiety and depression

    Shih Ying Gun;Nickolai Titov;Gavin Andrews

  • Transdiagnostic versus disorder-specific and clinician-guided versus self-guided internet-delivered treatment for generalized anxiety disorder and comorbid disorders: A randomized controlled trial

    B.F. Dear;L.G. Staples;M.D. Terides;E. Karin

  • Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health : results from the world health surveys. Commentary

    Gavin Andrews;Nickolai Titov;Saba Moussavi;Somnath Chatterji

Frequent Co-Authors

Blake F. Dear
Blake F. Dear Macquarie University
Gavin Andrews
Gavin Andrews University of New South Wales
Milena Gandy
Milena Gandy Macquarie University
Lauren G. Staples
Lauren G. Staples Macquarie University
Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos
Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos University of Regina
Bethany M. Wootton
Bethany M. Wootton University of Technology Sydney
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Peter M. McEvoy
Peter M. McEvoy Curtin University
Robert G. Knight
Robert G. Knight University of Otago
Ronald M. Rapee
Ronald M. Rapee Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up diverse career pathways, many of which can be pursued by earning online degrees. School counseling is a popular option, but requirements vary significantly by state. For example, those interested in working in Tennessee schools should familiarize themselves with the requirements to be a school counselor in Tennessee, which often include both graduate coursework and licensure exams.

If you plan to practice elsewhere, be sure to research local regulations. For those aiming to work in Texas, understanding the Texas school counselor certification requirements is essential, as Texas may have unique prerequisites compared to other states.

Similarly, if you want to learn more about the qualifications for becoming a school counselor in Utah, you can review what’s necessary for becoming a school counselor in Utah. Those interested in working in the Northeast should check out guidelines on how to become a school counselor in Vermont.

As online degree options expand, understanding these state-specific requirements will help you select the best program for your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Nickolai Titov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles