World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4104 3787 183 180 171 22000

Wolfgang Hiller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wolfgang Hiller between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wolfgang Hiller published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2011. 6 of the 187 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2011. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1988 2025

187 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wolfgang Hiller: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 4
1990 3
1991 1
1992 3
1993 0
1994 2
1995 3
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 4
2000 5
2001 1
2002 4
2003 4
2004 3
2005 5
2006 6
2007 3
2008 1
2009 6
2010 5
2011 19
2012 14
2013 15
2014 14
2015 15
2016 7
2017 9
2018 14
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
2023 1
2024 2
2025 4
Total 187
Download as CSV

Wolfgang Hiller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Hiller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 171 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 171
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Wolfgang Hiller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Hiller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Wolfgang Hiller is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work concentrates on several main topics, including:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

Wolfgang Hiller has an active publication record in several frequent venues, such as:

  • Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
  • Surgical Endoscopy
  • Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
  • Visceral Medicine

Among the notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Hiller are:

  • Consensus statements on complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer-technical steps and training implications (2022), Surgical Endoscopy
  • High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is associated with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics and an improved survival in early Colon cancer (CC); real world data from the AIO molecular registry Colopredict Plus (2020), Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
  • Upregulation of the histone γ-H2AX correlates with worse patient survival and basal-like subtype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (2024), Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
  • Cytokeratin 6 identifies basal-like subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with decreased survival (2023), Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
  • A German's Perspective on the Way toward Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Postoperative Questionnaire (2024), Visceral Medicine

Wolfgang Hiller frequently collaborates with colleagues including Patricia Tejedor, Nader Francis, David Jayne, Werner Hohenberger, and Jim Khan, each of whom has co-authored multiple publications with them.

Best Publications

  • Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults.

    Maria Kleinstäuber;Michael Witthöft;Andrés Steffanowski;Harm van Marwijk

  • Self-compassion as an emotion regulation strategy in major depressive disorder.

    Alice Diedrich;Michaela Grant;Stefan G. Hofmann;Wolfgang Hiller

  • Cognitive aspects of hypochondriasis and the somatization syndrome.

    Winfried Rief;Wolfgang Hiller;Juergen Margraf

  • Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

    Falk Leichsenring;Simone Salzer;Manfred E. Beutel;Stephan Herpertz

  • Somatization in the population: from mild bodily misperceptions to disabling symptoms

    Wolfgang Hiller;Winfried Rief;Elmar Brähler

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychodynamic psychotherapy: techniques, efficacy, and indications.

    Falk Leichsenring;Wolfgang Hiller;Michael Weissberg;Eric Leibing

  • The prevalence of medically unexplained symptoms in primary care.

    Natalie Steinbrecher;Stephanie Koerber;Dirk Frieser;Wolfgang Hiller

  • Factors Influencing Tinnitus Loudness and Annoyance

    Wolfgang Hiller;Gerhard Goebel

  • Effectiveness of and dropout from outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adult unipolar depression: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized effectiveness studies.

    Eva Hans;Wolfgang Hiller

  • Efficacy of short-term psychotherapy for multiple medically unexplained physical symptoms: a meta-analysis.

    Maria Kleinstäuber;Michael Witthöft;Wolfgang Hiller

  • A New Approach to the Assessment of the Treatment Effects of Somatoform Disorders

    Winfried Rief;Wolfgang Hiller

  • Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: A proposal for an international standard

    Michael Landgrebe;Andréia Azevedo;David Baguley;Carol Bauer

  • Rapid assessment of tinnitus-related psychological distress using the Mini-TQ.

    Wolfgang Hiller;Gerhard Goebel

  • A controlled treatment study of somatoform disorders including analysis of healthcare utilization and cost-effectiveness.

    Wolfgang Hiller;Manfred M Fichter;Winfried Rief

  • Psychological approaches to origins and treatments of somatoform disorders.

    Michael Witthöft;Wolfgang Hiller

  • Toward empirically based criteria for the classification of somatoform disorders.

    Winfried Rief;Wolfgang Hiller

  • A meta-analysis of nonrandomized effectiveness studies on outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders.

    Eva Hans;Wolfgang Hiller

  • Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films

    Meike K. Uhrig;Nadine Trautmann;Ulf Baumgärtner;Rolf-Detlef Treede

  • Dimensional and categorical approaches to hypochondriasis

    W. Hiller;W. Rief;M. M. Fichter

  • Classification characteristics of the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 for screening somatoform disorders in a primary care setting

    Stephanie Körber;Dirk Frieser;Natalie Steinbrecher;Wolfgang Hiller

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Witthöft
Michael Witthöft Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg
Stephan Herpertz
Stephan Herpertz Ruhr University Bochum
Falk Leichsenring
Falk Leichsenring University of Giessen
Ulrich Stangier
Ulrich Stangier Goethe University Frankfurt
Eric Leibing
Eric Leibing University of Göttingen
Manfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Bernhard Strauss
Bernhard Strauss Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Manfred M. Fichter
Manfred M. Fichter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens a gateway to diverse career pathways, particularly in behavior analysis. One of the most sought-after roles is Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which requires specialized coursework and supervised fieldwork. Each state or city may have unique licensure and education guidelines, so careful research is important.

For example, those interested in becoming certified in North Carolina can find details on Durham bcba education requirements. Learners eyeing Texas should look into how to become a bcba in El Paso and Fort Worth bcba education requirements. Those planning for roles in Indiana can review Fort Wayne bcba education requirements.

Online psychology degrees also support other impactful professions, such as counseling and social work. Many accredited programs offer flexibility for working adults, making it easier to balance commitments. No matter the path you choose, understanding local requirements will help you plan a successful transition from online studies to professional practice.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang Hiller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles