World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Falk Leichsenring

Falk Leichsenring

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3680 3394 164 161 233 14586

Falk Leichsenring publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Falk Leichsenring between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Falk Leichsenring published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2014. 17 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2014. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 6 publications
1964 2025

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Falk Leichsenring: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 7
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 5
2004 11
2005 6
2006 10
2007 10
2008 13
2009 12
2010 6
2011 18
2012 4
2013 14
2014 28
2015 11
2016 14
2017 16
2018 11
2019 17
2020 7
2021 5
2022 5
2023 8
2024 11
2025 6
Total 271
Download as CSV

Falk Leichsenring publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Falk Leichsenring sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 233 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 233
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Falk Leichsenring D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Falk Leichsenring sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Falk Leichsenring is affiliated with the University of Giessen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with an emphasis on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, and pharmacology.

The scientist's main research topics include psychotherapy techniques and applications, personality disorders and psychopathology, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, cognitive processes, mental health research topics, treatment of major depression, schizophrenia research and treatment, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Notable recent publications by Falk Leichsenring include:

  • The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses, 2022, World Psychiatry
  • Borderline Personality Disorder, 2023, JAMA
  • Borderline personality disorder: a comprehensive review of diagnosis and clinical presentation, etiology, treatment, and current controversies, 2024, World Psychiatry
  • The status of psychodynamic psychotherapy as an empirically supported treatment for common mental disorders - an umbrella review based on updated criteria, 2023, World Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors in Falk Leichsenring's work include Christiane Steinert, Nikolas Heim, Patrick Luyten, Allan Abbass, and Simone Salzer.

Publishing activity is concentrated in several journals, with multiple publications appearing in World Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychiatry, JAMA, BMJ Open, and The Lancet Psychiatry.

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of Long-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: A Meta-analysis

    Falk Leichsenring;Sven Rabung

  • The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis.

    Falk Leichsenring;Sven Rabung;Eric Leibing

  • The Effectiveness of Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive Behavior Therapy in the Treatment of Personality Disorders: A Meta-Analysis

    Falk Leichsenring;Eric Leibing

  • Short‐term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders

    Allan A Abbass;Jeffrey T Hancock;Julie Henderson;Steve R Kisely

  • The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta‐analytic evaluation of recent meta‐analyses

    Unknown

  • Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: update of a meta-analysis

    Falk Leichsenring;Sven Rabung

  • Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

    Falk Leichsenring;Simone Salzer;Manfred E. Beutel;Stephan Herpertz

  • COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF SHORT-TERM PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY AND COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY IN DEPRESSION: A META-ANALYTIC APPROACH

    Falk Leichsenring

  • Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Falk Leichsenring;Simone Salzer;Ulrich Jaeger;Horst Kächele

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychodynamic psychotherapy: techniques, efficacy, and indications.

    Falk Leichsenring;Wolfgang Hiller;Michael Weissberg;Eric Leibing

  • Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective? A review of empirical data

    Falk Leichsenring

  • Psychodynamic Therapy: As Efficacious as Other Empirically Supported Treatments? A Meta-Analysis Testing Equivalence of Outcomes.

    Christiane Steinert;Thomas Munder;Sven Rabung;Jürgen Hoyer

  • Is Alexithymia Associated with Specific Mental Disorders

    Frank Leweke;Falk Leichsenring;Johannes Kruse;Sandra Hermes

  • Randomized controlled versus naturalistic studies: a new research agenda.

    Falk Leichsenring

  • Development and first results of the Borderline Personality Inventory: a self-report instrument for assessing borderline personality organization.

    Falk Leichsenring

  • Social Anxiety Disorder

    Falk Leichsenring;Frank Leweke

  • Cost-of-illness studies and cost-effectiveness analyses in anxiety disorders: A systematic review

    Alexander Konnopka;Falk Leichsenring;Eric Leibing;Hans-Helmut König

  • Psychodynamic psychotherapy: A systematic review of techniques, indications and empirical evidence

    Falk Leichsenring;Eric Leibing

  • Therapist effects on outcome and alliance in inpatient psychotherapy.

    Ulrike Dinger;Micha Strack;Falk Leichsenring;Fabian Wilmers

  • Psychodynamic therapy meets evidence-based medicine: a systematic review using updated criteria

    Falk Leichsenring;Patrick Luyten;Patrick Luyten;Mark J Hilsenroth;Allan Abbass

  • Reduced amygdalar and hippocampal size in adults with generalized social phobia.

    Eva Irle;Mirjana Ruhleder;Claudia Lange;Ulrich Seidler-Brandler

  • The Efficacy of Short-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Specific Psychiatric Disorders

    Falk Leichsenring;Sven Rabung;Eric Leibing

  • Effectiveness of Long-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy : A Meta-analysis. Commentary

    Falk Leichsenring;Sven Rabung;Richard M. Glass

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Leibing
Eric Leibing University of Göttingen
Manfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Patrick Luyten
Patrick Luyten University College London
Jürgen Hoyer
Jürgen Hoyer TU Dresden
Jörg Wiltink
Jörg Wiltink Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Wolfgang Hiller
Wolfgang Hiller Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Henning Schauenburg
Henning Schauenburg Heidelberg University
Stephan Herpertz
Stephan Herpertz Ruhr University Bochum
Ulrich Stangier
Ulrich Stangier Goethe University Frankfurt
Mark J. Hilsenroth
Mark J. Hilsenroth Adelphi University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens up a wide array of related online degrees and future career options. For those interested in direct client work, enrolling in a clinical psychology psyd program requirements can lead to roles like licensed clinical psychologist, counselor, or therapist. These advanced programs often require internships and supervised clinical experience.

Exploring non-clinical opportunities, students might wonder what can you do with industrial/organizational psychology. This specialization prepares graduates for roles in business, HR, consulting, and organizational development, where understanding human behavior boosts workplace productivity.

Before committing, many ask, is studying psychology worth it? The answer often depends on your personal goals, the degree path you choose, and your willingness to pursue advanced education. Psychology degrees offer versatile skills valued in diverse industries.

Interested in the education sector? A master’s in this field opens doors to several masters in educational psychology jobs such as school psychologist, learning designer, or academic advisor.

Best Scientists Citing Falk Leichsenring

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles