World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Henning Schauenburg

Henning Schauenburg

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5157
World Ranking
9864
National Ranking
472

Henning Schauenburg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henning Schauenburg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 228 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Henning Schauenburg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henning Schauenburg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Focal psychodynamic therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, and optimised treatment as usual in outpatients with anorexia nervosa (ANTOP study): randomised controlled trial

    Stephan Zipfel;Beate Wild;Gaby Groß;Hans-Christoph Friederich

  • Assessing the level of structural integration using operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis (OPD): implications for DSM-5.

    Johannes Zimmermann;Johannes C. Ehrenthal;Manfred Cierpka;Henning Schauenburg

  • Therapist effects on outcome and alliance in inpatient psychotherapy.

    Ulrike Dinger;Micha Strack;Falk Leichsenring;Fabian Wilmers

  • [Evaluation of the German version of the attachment questionnaire "Experiences in Close Relationships--Revised" (ECR-RD)].

    Johannes C. Ehrenthal;Ulrike Dinger;Anneke Lamla;Bastian Funken

  • [The OPD Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ): first results on reliability and validity].

    Johannes C. Ehrenthal;Ulrike Dinger;Lena Horsch;Miriam Komo-Lang

  • Therapists' attachment, patients' interpersonal problems and alliance development over time in inpatient psychotherapy.

    Ulrike Dinger;Micha Strack;Tilmann Sachsse;Henning Schauenburg

  • Measuring psychotherapeutic change with the symptom checklist SCL 90 R.

    Henning Schauenburg;Micha Strack

  • The influence of psychodynamically oriented therapists' attachment representations on outcome and alliance in inpatient psychotherapy [corrected].

    Henning Schauenburg;Anna Buchheim;Kathrin Beckh;Tobias Nolte

  • Association Between Insight and Outcome of Psychotherapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Simone Jennissen;Julia Huber;Johannes C. Ehrenthal;Henning Schauenburg

  • Assessing DSM–5 Level of Personality Functioning From Videotaped Clinical Interviews: A Pilot Study With Untrained and Clinically Inexperienced Students

    Johannes Zimmermann;Cord Benecke;Donna S. Bender;Andrew E. Skodol

  • First-person Pronoun Use in Spoken Language as a Predictor of Future Depressive Symptoms: Preliminary Evidence from a Clinical Sample of Depressed Patients

    Johannes Zimmermann;Timo Brockmeyer;Matthias Hunn;Henning Schauenburg

  • Validierung einer deutschsprachigen 16-Item-Version des Inventars der Persönlichkeitsorganisation (IPO-16).

    Johannes Zimmermann;Cord Benecke;Susanne Hörz;Michael Rentrop

  • [Development of a 12-item version of the OPD-Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQS)].

    Johannes C Ehrenthal;Ulrike Dinger;Henning Schauenburg;Lena Horsch

  • Attachment characteristics and treatment outcome following inpatient psychotherapy: Results of a multisite study

    Bernhard Strauss;Helmut Kirchmann;Jochen Eckert;Audrey Lobo-Drost

  • Empirically supported methods of short-term psychodynamic therapy in depression - towards an evidence-based unified protocol.

    Falk Leichsenring;Henning Schauenburg

  • Quality and severity of depression in borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Johanna Köhling;Johannes C. Ehrenthal;Kenneth N. Levy;Henning Schauenburg

  • Self-criticism and psychotherapy outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Christina Alexandra Löw;Henning Schauenburg;Ulrike Dinger

  • The ANTOP study: focal psychodynamic psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioural therapy, and treatment-as-usual in outpatients with anorexia nervosa--a randomized controlled trial.

    Beate Wild;Hans-Christoph Friederich;Gaby Gross;Martin Teufel

  • Interpersonal Problems, Dependency, and Self‐Criticism in Major Depressive Disorder

    Ulrike Dinger;Ulrike Dinger;Marna S. Barrett;Johannes Zimmermann;Henning Schauenburg

  • INFLUENCES OF PATIENTS’ AND THERAPISTS’ INTERPERSONAL PROBLEMS AND THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE ON OUTCOME IN PSYCHOTHERAPY

    Ulrike Dinger;Micha Strack;Falk Leichsenring;Schauenburg Henning

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes Zimmermann
Johannes Zimmermann University of Kassel
Falk Leichsenring
Falk Leichsenring University of Giessen
Hans-Christoph Friederich
Hans-Christoph Friederich University Hospital Heidelberg
Frank Schneider
Frank Schneider Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Martin Hautzinger
Martin Hautzinger University of Tübingen
Martin Härter
Martin Härter Universität Hamburg
Anna Buchheim
Anna Buchheim University of Innsbruck
Manfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Bernhard Strauss
Bernhard Strauss Friedrich Schiller University Jena
John F. Clarkin
John F. Clarkin Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Henning Schauenburg

Recently Published Articles