World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Johannes Zimmermann

Johannes Zimmermann

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
10370
World Ranking
5005
National Ranking
231

Johannes Zimmermann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Zimmermann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 199 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Johannes Zimmermann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Zimmermann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johannes Zimmermann is affiliated with the University of Kassel in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with an emphasis on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, philosophy, applied psychology, and social psychology.

Their work covers a variety of topics related to personality and mental health. Key topics include:

  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Zimmermann has contributed to a number of publications, appearing in several prominent academic journals and datasets. Frequent publication venues include:

  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • European Journal of Personality
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • Journal of Personality Assessment
  • Psychological Assessment

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Descriptive, Predictive and Explanatory Personality Research: Different Goals, Different Approaches, but a Shared Need to Move beyond the Big Few Traits" (2020), European Journal of Personality
  • "International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1" (2020), Psychopathology
  • "Personality trait stability and change" (2021), Personality Science
  • "Development of a Short and ICD-11 Compatible Measure for DSM-5 Maladaptive Personality Traits Using Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms" (2020), Assessment
  • "Longitudinal Experience-Wide Association Studies-A Framework for Studying Personality Change" (2020), European Journal of Personality

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Zimmermann include:

  • Christopher J. Hopwood
  • Leon Patrick Wendt
  • Aidan G.C. Wright
  • André Kerber
  • Carsten Spitzer

Zimmermann has also published a book titled Gemeinde, Mission und Transformation (2020) through Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Best Publications

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Roman Kotov;Christopher J. Hopwood;Michael First

  • A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.

    Johannes Zimmermann;André Kerber;Katharina Rek;Christopher J. Hopwood

  • Measuring depression with a well-being index: Further evidence for the validity of the WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5) as a measure of the severity of depression

    Tobias Krieger;Johannes Zimmermann;Silke Huffziger;Bettina Ubl

  • The policy relevance of personality traits

    Wiebke Bleidorn;Patrick L. Hill;Mitja D. Back;Jaap J. A. Denissen

  • Baseline predictors for progression 4 years after Parkinson's disease diagnosis in the De Novo Parkinson Cohort (DeNoPa)

    Brit Mollenhauer;Johannes Zimmermann;Friederike Sixel-Döring;Niels K Focke

  • Assessing the level of structural integration using operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis (OPD): implications for DSM-5.

    Johannes Zimmermann;Johannes C. Ehrenthal;Manfred Cierpka;Henning Schauenburg

  • The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: findings from two German-speaking samples.

    Johannes Zimmermann;David Altenstein;Tobias Krieger;Martin Grosse Holtforth

  • Applied ambulatory assessment: Integrating idiographic and nomothetic principles of measurement.

    Aidan G C Wright;Johannes Zimmermann

  • Attachment-related mentalization moderates the relationship between psychopathic traits and proactive aggression in adolescence

    Svenja Taubner;Lars O. White;Johannes Zimmermann;Peter Fonagy

  • Descriptive, Predictive and Explanatory Personality Research: Different Goals, Different Approaches, but a Shared Need to Move beyond the Big Few Traits:

    Rene Mottus;Rene Mottus;Dustin Wood;David Condon;Mitja D. Back

  • Transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: change in reflective function

    Melitta Fischer-Kern;Stephan Doering;Svenja Taubner;Susanne Hörz

  • Internal structure of the Reflective Functioning Scale.

    Svenja Taubner;Susanne Hörz;Melitta Fischer-Kern;Stephan Doering

  • Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

    Thomas A. Widiger;Bo Bach;Michael Chmielewski;Lee Anna Clark

  • Me, myself, and I: self-referent word use as an indicator of self-focused attention in relation to depression and anxiety

    Timo Brockmeyer;Johannes Zimmermann;Dominika Kulessa;Martin Hautzinger

  • International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1

    Bo Bach;André Kerber;Anton Aluja;Tim Bastiaens

  • Infrahepatic inferior vena cava clamping for reduction of central venous pressure and blood loss during hepatic resection: a randomized controlled trial.

    Nuh N. Rahbari;Moritz Koch;Johannes B. Zimmermann;Heike Elbers

  • Assessing DSM–5 Level of Personality Functioning From Videotaped Clinical Interviews: A Pilot Study With Untrained and Clinically Inexperienced Students

    Johannes Zimmermann;Cord Benecke;Donna S. Bender;Andrew E. Skodol

  • Monitoring of 30 marker candidates in early Parkinson disease as progression markers.

    Brit Mollenhauer;Johannes Zimmermann;Friederike Sixel-Döring;Niels K. Focke

  • The latent structure of personality functioning: Investigating criterion a from the alternative model for personality disorders in DSM-5.

    Johannes Zimmermann;Jan R Böhnke;Rhea Eschstruth;Alessa Mathews

Frequent Co-Authors

Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
Henning Schauenburg
Henning Schauenburg Heidelberg University
Christopher J. Hopwood
Christopher J. Hopwood University of Zurich
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Martin Grosse Holtforth
Martin Grosse Holtforth University of Bern
Bo Bach
Bo Bach University of Copenhagen
Carsten Spitzer
Carsten Spitzer University of Rostock
David C. Cicero
David C. Cicero University of North Texas
Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt
Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt Oklahoma State University
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to a wide range of career paths. Many accredited universities now offer flexible online programs designed to fit the schedules of working adults and remote learners. These programs often mirror the curriculum and faculty expertise found in on-campus offerings, ensuring a high-quality education.

When considering your educational options, it’s helpful to review regional highlights. For instance, the top psychology programs in Orlando feature diverse specializations and career preparation resources. Similarly, students can learn about high-ranking options by exploring the best psychology program rankings in Phoenix, which highlight institutions with strong research and clinical training.

Career pathways in psychology include roles such as counselor, behavioral therapist, industrial-organizational psychologist, and researcher. Prospective students may want to compare the best psychology degree rankings in Raleigh and the top psychology programs in Reno to better understand which online or hybrid programs align with their career goals.

Whether pursuing a bachelor’s, master’s, or doctoral degree, taking the time to explore diverse programs will help you find an online psychology degree that meets both your academic and professional needs.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes Zimmermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles