World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
13449
World Ranking
3542
National Ranking
185

Blake F. Dear publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blake F. Dear sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 245 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Blake F. Dear D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blake F. Dear sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Blake F. Dear is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and medicine. Their work focuses on various aspects of digital mental health and pain management, with numerous publications in leading academic venues.

Their research spans several main fields:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these fields, Dear has specialized in subfields such as:

  • Applied Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Pharmacology

The primary topics of their work include:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Dear has published notable papers such as:

  • Managing patients with chronic pain during the COVID-19 outbreak: considerations for the rapid introduction of remotely supported (eHealth) pain management services (2020, Pain)
  • Consensus statement on the problem of terminology in psychological interventions using the internet or digital components (2020, Internet Interventions)
  • User characteristics and outcomes from a national digital mental health service: an observational study of registrants of the Australian MindSpot Clinic (2020, The Lancet Digital Health)
  • Rapid report: Early demand, profiles and concerns of mental health users during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic (2020, Internet Interventions)
  • Internet-delivered cognitive and behavioural based interventions for adults with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2022, Pain)

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Nickolai Titov
  • Eyal Karin
  • Madelyne A. Bisby
  • Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos
  • Lauren Staples

Blake F. Dear's work has appeared prominently in publication venues such as:

  • Internet Interventions
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • Pain
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Best Publications

  • Multimorbidity and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Jennifer R. Read;Louise Sharpe;Matthew Modini;Blake F. Dear

  • Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation

    Gerhard Andersson;Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Alexander Rozental

  • Managing patients with chronic pain during the COVID-19 outbreak: considerations for the rapid introduction of remotely supported (eHealth) pain management services.

    Christopher Eccleston;Fiona M. Blyth;Blake F. Dear;Emma A. Fisher

  • Psychometric Comparison of the PHQ-9 and BDI-II for Measuring Response during Treatment of Depression

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F Dear;Dean McMillan;Tracy Anderson

  • Transdiagnostic internet treatment for anxiety and depression: A randomised controlled trial

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Genevieve Schwencke;Gavin Andrews

  • Psychometric properties and clinical utility of brief measures of depression, anxiety, and general distress: The PHQ-2, GAD-2, and K-6

    Lauren G. Staples;Blake F. Dear;Milena Gandy;Vincent Fogliati

  • Improving Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Self-Guided Internet Treatment for Anxiety and Depression: Randomised Controlled Trial

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Luke Johnston;Carolyn Lorian

  • ICBT in routine care: A descriptive analysis of successful clinics in five countries.

    Nickolai Titov;Blake Dear;Olav Nielssen;Lauren Staples

  • Psychometric Comparison of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Measuring Response during Treatment of Generalised Anxiety Disorder

    Blake F Dear;Nickolai Titov;Matthew Sunderland;Dean McMillan

  • Clinical and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for older adults with symptoms of anxiety: a randomized controlled trial

    Blake F. Dear;Judy B. Zou;Shehzad Ali;Carolyn N. Lorian

  • Transdiagnostic versus disorder-specific and clinician-guided versus self-guided internet-delivered treatment for generalized anxiety disorder and comorbid disorders: A randomized controlled trial

    B.F. Dear;L.G. Staples;M.D. Terides;E. Karin

  • The Pain Course: a randomised controlled trial of a clinician-guided Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy program for managing chronic pain and emotional well-being.

    Blake F. Dear;Nick Titov;Kathryn Nicholson Perry;Luke Johnston

  • MindSpot Clinic: An Accessible, Efficient, and Effective Online Treatment Service for Anxiety and Depression.

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Lauren G. Staples;James Bennett-Levy

  • Culturally attuned internet treatment for depression amongst Chinese Australians : a randomised controlled trial

    Isabella Choi;Judy Zou;Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear

  • Disorder-specific versus transdiagnostic and clinician-guided versus self-guided treatment for major depressive disorder and comorbid anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial.

    N. Titov;B.F. Dear;L.G. Staples;M.D. Terides

  • The Pain Course: a randomised controlled trial examining an internet-delivered pain management program when provided with different levels of clinician support.

    Blake F. Dear;Milena Gandy;Eyal Karin;Lauren G. Staples

  • Randomized controlled trial of Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Jay Spence;Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Luke Johnston

  • A RCT of a transdiagnostic internet-delivered treatment for three anxiety disorders: examination of support roles and disorder-specific outcomes.

    Luke Johnston;Nickolai Titov;Gavin Andrews;Jay Spence

  • The first 30 months of the MindSpot Clinic: Evaluation of a national e-mental health service against project objectives:

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F Dear;Lauren G Staples;James Bennett-Levy

  • Towards a new model of attentional biases in the development, maintenance, and management of pain.

    Jemma Todd;Louise Sharpe;Ameika Johnson;Kathryn Nicholson Perry

  • Is there a potential role for attention bias modification in pain patients? Results of 2 randomised, controlled trials.

    Louise Sharpe;Melissa Ianiello;Blake F Dear;Kathryn Nicholson Perry

Frequent Co-Authors

Nickolai Titov
Nickolai Titov Macquarie University
Milena Gandy
Milena Gandy Macquarie University
Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos
Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos University of Regina
Lauren G. Staples
Lauren G. Staples Macquarie University
Bethany M. Wootton
Bethany M. Wootton University of Technology Sydney
Louise Sharpe
Louise Sharpe University of Sydney
Gavin Andrews
Gavin Andrews University of New South Wales
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Ronald M. Rapee
Ronald M. Rapee Macquarie University
Peter M. McEvoy
Peter M. McEvoy Curtin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA often goes hand-in-hand with related fields such as Social Work. Online degrees in Social Work offer flexible opportunities for students to gain valuable, real-world skills. These programs are designed to prepare graduates for meaningful careers supporting individuals, families, and communities.

Prospective students can access top-quality education in different regions. If you are considering schools in the Northeast, have a look at the best social work degree programs in the Northeast. If you are based in Oklahoma, discover the best social work degrees in Oklahoma, known for their specialized curriculum and local impact.

Major cities also offer excellent opportunities. Students interested in urban environments should consider the top social work programs in Philadelphia or explore the best social work programs in Portland. Both cities provide networks and resources for career advancement.

No matter where you study, an online degree in Social Work can open the door to diverse career pathways—from clinical settings to nonprofit organizations. These options make it easier than ever to blend your interests in Psychology with impactful professional roles.

Best Scientists Citing Blake F. Dear

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles