World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter M. McEvoy

Peter M. McEvoy

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
13680
World Ranking
4747
National Ranking
268

Peter M. McEvoy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. McEvoy sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 163 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter M. McEvoy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. McEvoy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter M. McEvoy is affiliated with Curtin University in Australia and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in the field of psychology.

Their research focuses significantly on clinical psychology, with notable contributions in experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as topics intersecting general health professions, sociology, political science, and social psychology.

Main research topics covered include:

  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Peter M. McEvoy has contributed numerous papers, including:

  • "The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Relations with Affective Symptoms in a United States General Community Sample," 2021, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "Positive outcomes from integrating telehealth into routine clinical practice for eating disorders during COVID-19," 2021, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "Assessing the validity of self-report social media use: Evidence of No relationship with objective smartphone use," 2022, Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Prospective risk and protective factors for psychopathology and wellbeing in civilian emergency services personnel: a systematic review," 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "Change, connection and community: A qualitative exploration of farmers' mental health," 2023, Journal of Rural Studies

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • David M. Erceg-Hurn
  • Sarah J. Egan
  • Andrew R. Johnson
  • Kate E. Tonta
  • Penelope Hasking

Their publications often appear in journals such as:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Best Publications

  • Computer Therapy for the Anxiety and Depressive Disorders Is Effective, Acceptable and Practical Health Care: A Meta-Analysis

    Gavin Andrews;Pim Cuijpers;Michelle G. Craske;Peter McEvoy

  • Computer therapy for the anxiety and depression disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: An updated meta-analysis

    G. Andrews;A. Basu;P. Cuijpers;M.G. Craske

  • To be sure, to be sure: intolerance of uncertainty mediates symptoms of various anxiety disorders and depression.

    Peter M. McEvoy;Alison E.J. Mahoney

  • The relationship between worry, rumination, and comorbidity: evidence for repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic construct.

    Peter M. McEvoy;Hunna Watson;Edward R. Watkins;Edward R. Watkins;Paula Nathan

  • Efficacy of transdiagnostic treatments: A review of published outcome studies and future research directions

    Peter M. McEvoy;Paula MPsych Nathan;Peter J. Norton

  • Achieving certainty about the structure of intolerance of uncertainty in a treatment-seeking sample with anxiety and depression

    Peter M. McEvoy;Alison E.J. Mahoney

  • Are worry, rumination, and post-event processing one and the same? Development of the repetitive thinking questionnaire

    Peter M McEvoy;Alison E J Mahoney;Michelle L Moulds

  • Transdiagnostic internet treatment for anxiety and depression: A randomised controlled trial

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Genevieve Schwencke;Gavin Andrews

  • Improving Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Self-Guided Internet Treatment for Anxiety and Depression: Randomised Controlled Trial

    Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Luke Johnston;Carolyn Lorian

  • Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the Australian general population: findings of the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing

    Peter M. McEvoy;Rachel Grove;Tim Slade

  • A transdiagnostic examination of intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety and depressive disorders

    Alison E J Mahoney;Peter M McEvoy

  • Intolerance of uncertainty in emotional disorders: What uncertainties remain?

    Sarah Shihata;Peter M. McEvoy;Barbara Ann Mullan;R. Nicholas Carleton

  • The impact of methodological and measurement factors on transdiagnostic associations with intolerance of uncertainty: A meta-analysis

    Peter M. McEvoy;Matthew P. Hyett;Sarah Shihata;Jordan E. Price

  • Transdiagnostic versus disorder-specific and clinician-guided versus self-guided internet-delivered treatment for generalized anxiety disorder and comorbid disorders: A randomized controlled trial

    B.F. Dear;L.G. Staples;M.D. Terides;E. Karin

  • Effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for diagnostically heterogeneous groups: a benchmarking study.

    Peter M. McEvoy;Paula Nathan

  • Disorder-specific versus transdiagnostic and clinician-guided versus self-guided treatment for major depressive disorder and comorbid anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial.

    N. Titov;B.F. Dear;L.G. Staples;M.D. Terides

  • Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural group therapy for social phobia in a community clinic: a benchmarking study.

    Peter M. McEvoy

  • The search for universal transdiagnostic and trans-therapy change processes: Evidence for intolerance of uncertainty.

    Peter M. McEvoy;David M. Erceg-Hurn

  • Comparison of three models of alcohol craving in young adults: a cross-validation.

    Peter M. Mcevoy;Werner G. K. Stritzke;Davina J. French;Alan R. Lang

  • The post-event processing questionnaire in a clinical sample with social phobia

    Peter M. McEvoy;Patrick Kingsep

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah J. Egan
Sarah J. Egan Curtin University
Ronald M. Rapee
Ronald M. Rapee Macquarie University
Nickolai Titov
Nickolai Titov Macquarie University
Michelle L. Moulds
Michelle L. Moulds University of New South Wales
Clare S. Rees
Clare S. Rees Curtin University
Penelope Hasking
Penelope Hasking Curtin University
Blake F. Dear
Blake F. Dear Macquarie University
Susan M. Byrne
Susan M. Byrne University of Western Australia
Gavin Andrews
Gavin Andrews University of New South Wales
R. Nicholas Carleton
R. Nicholas Carleton University of Regina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in studying psychology in the USA have access to a broad range of online degrees that can pave the way for various career opportunities. Many programs offer specialized tracks that lead to roles such as mental health counselors, marriage and family therapists, or behavioral therapists. Online degrees in psychology or counseling provide the flexibility to balance study with work and life commitments, making them an accessible choice for many.

Choosing the right career pathway often depends on local requirements. For example, if you're looking to become a mental health counselor in Indianapolis, you’ll need to review the specific state licensure processes. Similarly, understanding Irvine mental health counselor certification requirements is essential if you plan to practice in California. Those considering Texas should explore how to become a mental health counselor in Irving. In Florida, it’s important to be aware of Jacksonville mental health counselor education requirements for state-specific guidance.

By exploring these different online programs and local requirements, students can prepare for a fulfilling career path dedicated to improving mental health in their communities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. McEvoy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles