World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
24877
World Ranking
5201
National Ranking
427

Gwenaëlle Douaud publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gwenaëlle Douaud sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gwenaëlle Douaud D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gwenaëlle Douaud sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gwenaëlle Douaud is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans Medicine, Neuroscience, and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with focused subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work encompasses various topics such as Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies.

Gwenaëlle Douaud has contributed to numerous publications, including highly cited papers such as:

  • SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank, 2022, Nature
  • An expanded set of genome-wide association studies of brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • XTRACT - Standardised protocols for automated tractography in the human and macaque brain, 2020, NeuroImage
  • SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain aging comprises many modes of structural and functional change with distinct genetic and biophysical associations, 2020, eLife

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Douaud include:

  • Stephen M. Smith
  • Fidel Alfaro-Almagro
  • Lloyd T. Elliott
  • Christoph Arthofer
  • Karla L. Miller

The research output has been published often in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Neuroscience
  • NeuroImage
  • Imaging Neuroscience
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

Best Publications

  • SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank

    Unknown

  • Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study

    Karla L Miller;Fidel Alfaro-Almagro;Neal K Bangerter;David L Thomas

  • Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers.

    Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi;Gwenaëlle Douaud;Christian F. Beckmann;Matthew F. Glasser

  • Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project

    S M Smith;C F Beckmann;J Andersson;E J Auerbach

  • Image processing and Quality Control for the first 10,000 brain imaging datasets from UK Biobank.

    Fidel Alfaro-Almagro;Mark Jenkinson;Neal K. Bangerter;Jesper L. R. Andersson

  • ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging

    Ludovica Griffanti;Ludovica Griffanti;Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi;Christian F. Beckmann;Edward J. Auerbach

  • Anatomically related grey and white matter abnormalities in adolescent-onset schizophrenia

    Gwenaëlle Douaud;Stephen Smith;Mark Jenkinson;Timothy Behrens

  • Genome-wide association studies of brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank

    Lloyd T. Elliott;Kevin Sharp;Fidel Alfaro-Almagro;Sinan Shi

  • Preventing Alzheimer’s disease-related gray matter atrophy by B-vitamin treatment

    Gwenaëlle Douaud;Gwenaëlle Douaud;Helga Refsum;Helga Refsum;Helga Refsum;Celeste A. de Jager;Robin Jacoby

  • Hand classification of fMRI ICA noise components.

    Ludovica Griffanti;Gwenaëlle Douaud;Janine D. Bijsterbosch;Stefania Evangelisti

  • DTI measures in crossing-fibre areas: increased diffusion anisotropy reveals early white matter alteration in MCI and mild Alzheimer's disease.

    Gwenaëlle Douaud;Saâd Jbabdi;Timothy Edward John Behrens;Ricarda A. Menke

  • Extending the Human Connectome Project across ages: Imaging protocols for the Lifespan Development and Aging projects

    Michael P. Harms;Leah H. Somerville;Beau M. Ances;Jesper Andersson

  • Brain morphometry and cognitive performance in detoxified alcohol-dependents with preserved psychosocial functioning.

    Sandra Chanraud;Catherine Martelli;Francoise Delain;Nikoletta Kostogianni

  • An expanded set of genome-wide association studies of brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank.

    Stephen M Smith;Gwenaëlle Douaud;Winfield Chen;Taylor Hanayik

  • Longitudinal changes in grey and white matter during adolescence

    A Giorgio;K E Watkins;M Chadwick;S James

  • Thalamic Atrophy Associated With Painful Osteoarthritis of the Hip Is Reversible After Arthroplasty A Longitudinal Voxel-Based Morphometric Study

    Stephen E. Gwilym;Nicola Filippini;Gwenaelle Douaud;Andrew J. Carr

  • A common brain network links development, aging, and vulnerability to disease

    Gwenaëlle Douaud;Adrian R. Groves;Christian K. Tamnes;Lars Tjelta Westlye

  • Changes in white matter microstructure during adolescence.

    A Giorgio;K E Watkins;G Douaud;A C James;A C James

  • Connectivity-Based Functional Analysis of Dopamine Release in the Striatum Using Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Positron Emission Tomography

    Andri C. Tziortzi;Suzanne N. Haber;Graham E. Searle;Charalampos Tsoumpas

  • Faster permutation inference in brain imaging

    Anderson M. Winkler;Gerard R. Ridgway;Gwenaëlle Douaud;Thomas E. Nichols

  • Corpus callosum involvement is a consistent feature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    N Filippini;G Douaud;C E Mackay;S Knight

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Smith
Stephen M. Smith University of Oxford
Paul M. Matthews
Paul M. Matthews Imperial College London
Karla L. Miller
Karla L. Miller University of Oxford
Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos
Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos University of Nottingham
Nicola Filippini
Nicola Filippini University of Oxford
Thomas E. Nichols
Thomas E. Nichols University of Oxford
Heidi Johansen-Berg
Heidi Johansen-Berg University of Oxford
Mark Jenkinson
Mark Jenkinson University of Oxford
Saad Jbabdi
Saad Jbabdi University of Oxford
Clare E. Mackay
Clare E. Mackay University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a wide array of careers in mental health, psychology, and counseling. Many students interested in these fields look for flexible, accelerated pathways to earn their degrees and start making an impact sooner.

For those seeking a quick route to clinical work, one year msw programs offer intensive training in social work that can lead directly to licensure. If you’re more inclined toward understanding human behavior and cognition, the fastest online psychology degree options allow you to complete your studies efficiently and conveniently.

Students often consider specialized counseling degrees to complement their neuroscience background. There are reputable online mental health counseling programs that meet industry standards and prepare graduates for professional practice. Those seeking broader training might opt for an online master's in counseling, which opens diverse career pathways across educational, clinical, and organizational settings.

These online degree programs are designed for flexibility, affordability, and quick entry into growing fields, making them excellent options for neuroscience majors exploring related professions.

Best Scientists Citing Gwenaëlle Douaud

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles