World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
25890
World Ranking
13720
National Ranking
1274

R. J. Grimer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. J. Grimer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 335 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

R. J. Grimer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. J. Grimer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. J. Grimer is affiliated with the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions across several subfields, including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology, Surgery, Oncology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The expert's work centers on topics related to sarcoma diagnosis and treatment, bone tumor diagnosis and treatments, vascular tumors and angiosarcomas, cardiac tumors and thrombi, musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments, surgical site infection prevention, and the management of metastatic bone disease.

Frequent venues for their publications include The Bone & Joint Journal, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Journal of Surgical Oncology, International Journal of Clinical Oncology, and SAGE Open Medicine.

R. J. Grimer has coauthored multiple papers with several researchers, with frequent collaborators including Michael Parry, Tomohiro Fujiwara, Jonathan Stevenson, Yusuke Tsuda, and Lee Jeys.

Some of the recent papers involving R. J. Grimer include:

  • Navigation-assisted pelvic resections and reconstructions for periacetabular chondrosarcomas, 2020, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Limb-salvage reconstruction following resection of pelvic bone sarcomas involving the acetabulum, 2021, The Bone & Joint Journal
  • Acetabular reconstruction with an ice-cream cone prosthesis following resection of pelvic tumors: Does computer navigation improve surgical outcome?, 2020, Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Pelvic reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis: correlation between the inserted length of the coned stem and surgical outcome, 2021, International Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Impact of NICE guidelines on the survival of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, 2021, The Bone & Joint Journal

Best Publications

  • Ewing Sarcoma: Current Management and Future Approaches Through Collaboration

    Nathalie Gaspar;Douglas S. Hawkins;Uta Dirksen;Ian J. Lewis

  • The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital: A 15-YEAR PROSPECTIVE SURVEY

    J. E. Phillips;T. P. Crane;M. Noy;T. S. J. Elliott

  • Fusion of SYT to two genes, SSX1 and SSX2, encoding proteins with homology to the Kruppel-associated box in human synovial sarcoma.

    A.J. Crew;J. Clark;C. Fisher;S. Gill

  • Bone sarcomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    P.G. Casali;J.-Y. Blay

  • Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study.

    Sant Chawla;Robert Henshaw;Leanne Seeger;Edwin Choy

  • ASEPTIC LOOSENING IN CEMENTED CUSTOM-MADE PROSTHETIC REPLACEMENTS FOR BONE TUMOURS OF THE LOWER LIMB

    P. S. Unwin;S. R. Cannon;R. J. Grimer;H. B. S. Kemp

  • Guidelines for the Management of Soft Tissue Sarcomas

    Robert Grimer;Ian Judson;David Peake;Beatrice Seddon

  • Survival and prognosis with osteosarcoma: outcomes in more than 2000 patients in the EURAMOS-1 (European and American Osteosarcoma Study) cohort

    Sigbjørn Smeland;Stefan S. Bielack;Jeremy Whelan;Mark Bernstein

  • UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas.

    Adam Dangoor;Beatrice Seddon;Craig Gerrand;Robert Grimer

  • Improvement in Histologic Response But Not Survival in Osteosarcoma Patients Treated With Intensified Chemotherapy: A Randomized Phase III Trial of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup

    Ian J. Lewis;Marianne A. Nooij;Jeremy Whelan;Matthew R. Sydes

  • Risk factors for survival and local control in chondrosarcoma of bone

    F. Fiorenza;A. Abudu;R. J. Grimer;S. R. Carter

  • Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur for bone tumours: LONG-TERM RESULTS

    G. J. C. Myers;A. T. Abudu;S. R. Carter;R. M. Tillman

  • EURAMOS-1, an international randomised study for osteosarcoma: results from pre-randomisation treatment

    J. S. Whelan;S. S. Bielack;N. Marina;S. Smeland

  • Periprosthetic Infection in Patients Treated for an Orthopaedic Oncological Condition

    L.M. Jeys;R.J. Grimer;S.R. Carter;R.M. Tillman

  • Endoprosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors of the appendicular skeleton and pelvis.

    L.M. Jeys;A. Kulkarni;R.J. Grimer;S.R. Carter

  • Results of the EICESS-92 Study: Two Randomized Trials of Ewing's Sarcoma Treatment—Cyclophosphamide Compared With Ifosfamide in Standard-Risk Patients and Assessment of Benefit of Etoposide Added to Standard Treatment in High-Risk Patients

    Michael Paulussen;Alan W. Craft;Ian Lewis;Allan Hackshaw

  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumors : ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    J.Y. Blay;C. Blomqvist;S. Bonvalot;I. Boukovinas

  • Ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy in Ewing's sarcoma: The Second United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group and the Medical Research Council Ewing's Tumor Study.

    A Craft;S Cotterill;A Malcolm;D Spooner

  • Surgical outcomes in osteosarcoma

    R. J. Grimer;A. M. Taminiau;S. R. Cannon

  • UK Guidelines for the Management of Bone Sarcomas.

    Robert Grimer;Nick Athanasou;Craig Gerrand;Ian Judson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian Judson
Ian Judson Institute of Cancer Research
Alessandro Gronchi
Alessandro Gronchi University of Milan
Andrea C. Ferrari
Andrea C. Ferrari University of Cambridge
Hans Gelderblom
Hans Gelderblom Leiden University Medical Center
Piotr Rutkowski
Piotr Rutkowski Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
Heikki Joensuu
Heikki Joensuu University of Helsinki
Mikael Eriksson
Mikael Eriksson Karolinska Institute
Paolo G. Casali
Paolo G. Casali University of Milan
Silvia Stacchiotti
Silvia Stacchiotti University of Milan
Jay S. Wunder
Jay S. Wunder University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring health and medicine doesn’t always mean medical school. For students interested in flexible, cost-effective study options, a range of online degrees in allied health fields can open doors to rewarding careers.

If you’re drawn to healthcare technology and patient data, online rhit degree programs offer training for roles in health information management, often with affordable tuition and a focus on career-readiness.

Interested in working behind the scenes in healthcare? Understanding how much is medical billing and coding school can help you assess if this rapid-entry field is the right fit. These programs typically require less time and can lead to stable, in-demand positions.

For those aspiring to provide direct patient care, yet looking for budget-friendly distance learning, consider the cheapest online np programs or cheapest online nursing program. Both options allow students to advance their nursing careers with flexible schedules and accredited instruction.

Choosing an online health degree is a practical way to build skills and start making an impact in healthcare, whether you’re caring for patients or managing vital information.

Best Scientists Citing R. J. Grimer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles